micro 38: 7p micro normal

[Robocopter87]

No.

Dude, you aren't Thor. You are Thor/Majiffy

He has played with Thor, but not with Majiffy.

What does he know about Majiffy? Nothing.
What does he know about Thor? Something.

I see no issue with either of his statements. Yet you continue to blow things way out of proportion.

Robocop, what makes you so sure that Kimor isn't scum, other than him using a RQS (which really doesn't mean much imo)?

He hasn't done anything scummy yet. Thus, he is not scum to me.

I'm more curious as to why you think he is scum, because it looks to me like you are a sheep.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

@Robo - do you think he honestly knows about how I would react to TQS and *also* doesn't know how I would push a case?

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Because that is what he is claiming.

[Robocopter87]

Yea sure why not

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

I'm actually having to walk you through this, aren't I? Okay...

Okay, so you think it's legit that he understands one and doesn't understand the other. A few questions to consider then;

Q: Why do you think he understands the one (how I react to RQS)?
A: Because he read one (or more) games with me in them - at the very least the early stages of the game.

Q: If he did that, how much is the minimum amount of reading he would do?
A: At the very least, let's say the first 2-3 pages of a game, enough for someone to ask RQS and have me respond to them.

Q: How many games would he have read?
A: At least one, and for it to be "normal" for me I'll go ahead and assume he checked 2-3 games since I don't always have people ask RQS to me.

Q: Go look at any random 2-3 games of Thor's - do you think you'll find *ONE* where Thor isn't pushing a case in the way he *literally always* pushes a case?
A: ...?

Q: If he found it worthwhile to do research on how I respond to RQS - why wouldn't he do the same thing with how I push cases?
A: Because he's lying about one of the instances.

Q: Why would he lie?
A: He's scum.


Where am I wrong, Robo?

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Hey, Looked at my 6 most recently completed games (none of which have RQS in them) and I advocate lynching without a case, speed lynching, demanding that people sheep me, demanding that people get votes in play, ect. ect. in all of them.

He must have done a *VERY* narrow viewed set of research on me to know about how I respond to RQS while still having literally no understanding in how I advance cases or act in the early stages of the game.

Busted scum folks.
You heard it here first.
I will mock you post game if you don't notice this, I have no shame.

[Kimor]

I'm actually having to walk you through this, aren't I? Okay...

Okay, so you think it's legit that he understands one and doesn't understand the other. A few questions to consider then;

Q: Why do you think he understands the one (how I react to RQS)?
A: Because he read one (or more) games with me in them - at the very least the early stages of the game.

Q: If he did that, how much is the minimum amount of reading he would do?
A: At the very least, let's say the first 2-3 pages of a game, enough for someone to ask RQS and have me respond to them.

Q: How many games would he have read?
A: At least one, and for it to be "normal" for me I'll go ahead and assume he checked 2-3 games since I don't always have people ask RQS to me.

Q: Go look at any random 2-3 games of Thor's - do you think you'll find *ONE* where Thor isn't pushing a case in the way he *literally always* pushes a case?
A: ...?

Q: If he found it worthwhile to do research on how I respond to RQS - why wouldn't he do the same thing with how I push cases?
A: Because he's lying about one of the instances.

Q: Why would he lie?
A: He's scum.


Where am I wrong, Robo?

I don't have a lot of time to respond right now, but I should clear something up. My prior account was Netopalis. Thor and I played 1-2 games together during 2009-2011. I may not remember everything, but I do remember that I asked some random questions once and Thor didn't like them. I don't remember Thor being as aggressive. Forgive me for not remembering every detail of half of your playing style.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=13188

Found that.
No RQS.
No other games with you that I found.
I do openly state in that game that I think RVS and early aggression is a good thing.
I'll admit I actually don't really believe that you remembered something from over two and a half years ago regardless.

Look forward to the full response when you have "time"

[mykonian]

votecount

Kimor (3): Empking, TwoUpstandingGentlemen, ovyo
ovyo (1): Battousai
TwoUpstandingGentlemen (1): Robocopter87

not voting (1): kimor, Cheery Dog

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Dude, you aren't Thor. You are Thor/Majiffy

He has played with Thor, but not with Majiffy.

What does he know about Majiffy? Nothing.
What does he know about Thor? Something.

How does his knowledge of either of our metas pertain to the fact that he's made a pretty blatant lie?

This is not the Robo I'm used to having sheep me.

In regards to Kimor's meta-statement; do you think a person's meta is unlikely to change over a 1-3 year period? Because 2009-2012 is 3 years, bucko.

-Majiffy

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Majiffy, 3 years notwithstanding, the more shocking thing is he claims to remember something from 'X' years ago, but remembered it wrong (unless he finds a game I didn't) and also used that 3 year old incorrect knowledge as part of his "assessing" RQS. He is faking scumhunting so hard it's painful.

You and I also need to discuss the read on Robo, because I think I'm agreeing with that strain - to the QT!

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

I don't think it's that shocking that he's recalling something incorrectly. Kind of fucked up he didn't check though.

See you at the QT.

[Robocopter87]

This is not the Robo I'm used to having sheep me.

I don't think I've ever sheeped Majiffy

ITS A BLATANT LIE HES OBVSCUM, KILL ON SIGHT

Seriously. Thats you. Thats what you sound like right now.

Also, please stop talking to yourself in thread.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

But I'm enjoying the authentic schizophrenic experience.

-Majiffy

[Robocopter87]

Wanna hear more from Emp and Batt

[Empking]

Wanna hear more from Emp and Batt

I've nothing more to say. Is there something wierd about TUG's avatar that makes it difficult to digest the thread or is it just me?

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

I can hardly take my own eyes off of it.

-Majiffy

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

ITS A BLATANT LIE HES OBVSCUM, KILL ON SIGHT

Seriously. Thats you. Thats what you sound like right now.

Um...yeah, I agree - because it's the right thing to do. Feel free to explain to me how it's not either a lie or how it's a lie that isn't indicative of scum though - that might be worth hearing.

Remember Post 79? I'm still waiting for you to tell me where I was wrong, y'know.

Also, please stop talking to yourself in thread.

Why?

[Battousai]

Well, wanted to see if ovya would react to a vote with no reason... she ignored it.

So time to start getting into the game.

TUG is scum,

unvote; vote: TUG

Robo is also scum. Probably greater chance than TUG, but I really don't want to play much with Majiffy. The whole bully others to follow shtick makes me want to policy lynch him and that's why it's on TUG over Robo.

Really like this post...

That's the best you can offer when a good portion of the player list was waiting for specifically your answers?
You're pathetic.

-Majiffy

Mainly because 1) game start to my post was ~10 hrs on a Saturday, 2) the RQS questions were bullshit, and 3) TUG actually agrees that they were bullshit. If anyone was waiting on my answer to get an analysis, then they are scum or really don't understand how bullshit those questions were. No way they'd give you any analysis that was worth anything; RVS would have been better than that. Also, what kept TUG from doing something else more constructive?

Robo is scum for: Thinking ovya is scummy based on noob tells, posts 54/57/72 are just kissing up to defend himself, then 89 he tries to change the subject.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Also, what kept TUG from doing something else more constructive?

You mean like creating pressure, making a case, and pursuing it?
Like we did?
Something like that?

[Battousai]

Being a dick and creating pressure are two different things.

Moving forward, I think I'll ignore anything addressed to me by Majiffy. Thor, I'll answer it from you if you have anything to add.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Actually that was me, Majiffy signs his posts and I don't.

I also am the one who made the bulk of the case - care to address it since you skipped immediately over it to have some sort of personal feud with half of this player slot?

[Empking]

Batt: Thoughts on the subject of Robo and TUG being scum together?

[Robocopter87]

I regret asking Batt to post. Big meanie called me scum when I'm clearly town.

But scum with TUG? Man thats got to be one heck of a scumteam. Goodlooking too.

[TwoUpstandingGentlemen]

Being a dick and creating pressure are two different things.

Moving forward, I think I'll ignore anything addressed to me by Majiffy.

I'm so excited I get to use the same picture in two games in the same day.