Is your entire defense whenever you're wrong about something is to cover your face with your hand and ask your accusers to shut up? This is the second time you've been
proven
wrong this game, and all you do is say "shut up, shut up, go away, I'm ignoring you!"
Anyone who isn't Kimor's partner (Robo, here's lookin' at you, kid) should be voting Kimor right now. This play screams scum.
-Majiffy
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
In post 252, TwoUpstandingGentlemen wrote:Is your entire defense whenever you're wrong about something is to cover your face with your hand and ask your accusers to shut up? This is the second time you've been
proven
wrong this game, and all you do is say "shut up, shut up, go away, I'm ignoring you!"
Anyone who isn't Kimor's partner (Robo, here's lookin' at you, kid) should be voting Kimor right now. This play screams scum.
-Majiffy
I have answered the first question a million times. No matter how many times I answer it, you are not going to be pleased with it.
The second question - I think that this whole idea of "sheeping" without knowing a players' alignment 100% is ridiculously stupid. Perhaps there is a disconnect there. Perhaps I come from a different era of Mafia play, where we were expected to make the occasional mistake, but we were also expected to
think for ourselves
. Perhaps that ideal is dead now. I hope it isn't. That was one of the reasons that I really liked this site.
Zvarri! The truth has once again been elegantly revealed to me!
I'm not disagreeing with you on that. I'm disagreeing with you on the fact that stupidity is a scumtell. It isn't. And that is the exact claim you're positing by the false dichotomy you posed.
So I suppose you can keep hiding your face, sticking your fingers in your ears and going la-la-la I can't hear you! or whatever other nonsensical childish forms of disregard you feel is appropriate. But one thing IS for certain: lying, obfuscating the truth to hide your lies, and ignoring completely valid arguments are all legitimate scumtells. And you are performing all of them at full speed with no idea where the break is.
-Majiffy
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
In post 254, TwoUpstandingGentlemen wrote:I'm not disagreeing with you on that. I'm disagreeing with you on the fact that stupidity is a scumtell. It isn't. And that is the exact claim you're positing by the false dichotomy you posed.
So I suppose you can keep hiding your face, sticking your fingers in your ears and going la-la-la I can't hear you! or whatever other nonsensical childish forms of disregard you feel is appropriate. But one thing IS for certain: lying, obfuscating the truth to hide your lies, and ignoring completely valid arguments are all legitimate scumtells. And you are performing all of them at full speed with no idea where the break is.
-Majiffy
But, that's just it. I don't think that Cheery is that stupid - I think he's doing something acceptably stupid because he thinks he can get away with it.
Zvarri! The truth has once again been elegantly revealed to me!
This switching accounts thing is starting to piss me off. Mod, please delete the previous.
So you think he's scum because he's doing something that town could do but he is specifically doing because he's scum?
Yeah, that's not circular at all. Totally legitimate argument there.
-Majiffy
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
In post 257, TwoUpstandingGentlemen wrote:This switching accounts thing is starting to piss me off. Mod, please delete the previous.
So you think he's scum because he's doing something that town could do but he is specifically doing because he's scum?
Yeah, that's not circular at all. Totally legitimate argument there.
-Majiffy
Town could do it, but I think it's more likely that he is more intelligent than that.
Zvarri! The truth has once again been elegantly revealed to me!
I made it pretty clear... with like every post I've made in the game.
That whole... signing things as Majiffy? Yeah.
In post 259, Kimor wrote:Town could do it, but I think it's more likely that he is more intelligent than that.
So you think an action that could easily be made by a moron regardless of alignment is more likely an action being taken as intelligent scum who thinks that if they act null-dumb that town will think they're town for being dumb?
Not only is that the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard, Ockham is rolling over in his grave.
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
In post 179, Robocopter87 wrote:a. Stop repeating your case over and over and driving activity down. (Yes, I'm crediting this decline to you. This game is getting kind of uninteresting)
In post 172, Cheery Dog wrote:
I'll get out of bed when the arguing stops, currently all this complaining at each other is making me want to stay in longer.
Zvarri! The truth has once again been elegantly revealed to me!
In post 179, Robocopter87 wrote:a. Stop repeating your case over and over and driving activity down. (Yes, I'm crediting this decline to you. This game is getting kind of uninteresting)
My most recent point on you didn't actually have anything to do with the case that Robo was talking about here.
In post 172, Cheery Dog wrote:
I'll get out of bed when the arguing stops, currently all this complaining at each other is making me want to stay in longer.
Arguing in a mafia game?! You don't say!
How the fuck else do you expect to lynch someone? Politely asking themselves to resign by self-voting? Lolno.
In post 264, TwoUpstandingGentlemen wrote:
Arguing in a mafia game?! You don't say!
How the fuck else do you expect to lynch someone? Politely asking themselves to resign by self-voting? Lolno.
Repeating yourself over the same arguments are not the kind of arguing I am able to enjoy while playing mafia. I am aware it happens, and that I am able to get involved in the same type of thing. (which I think I was also doing with Kimor).
They manage to slow the game down and other people will be come disinterested, which is what I think has happened here.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
Well maybe if people readily offered up their opinions on things such as the arguments (and saying "uhhh this argument is STOOPID"
isn't
a valid opinion, regardless of your opinion on the potential of validity in opinions) we could move on.
But instead, we have a bunch of retards stuffing their fingers up their asses and saying "LOL ILL SPEAK WHEN WE MOVE ON", and we CAN'T until either we lynch Kimor or people start fucking talking.
-Majiffy
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
In post 245, Battousai wrote:I find cheery's comments to be scummy. Blindly sheeping a case where, you initially thought it was bad, and only going with it now because you remember an instance where it happened before is just bad logic. Combined with the fact that he initially came in thinking that he was going to hammer Kimor on it, puts him at near the top of my scumlist.
unvote, vote: ovyo
You got a lot of assignments and couldn't play because of it? I don't believe that fully. You have time to come on today and explain it and say you'll post more later, yet you had 0 time in the past 4 days to get on and tell us your swamped; which is after someone asked that you'd be replaced.
Just to put this back out here since it got ignored. Ovyo hasn't posted again for 36 hrs.
In post 265, Cheery Dog wrote:
Repeating yourself over the same arguments are not the kind of arguing I am able to enjoy while playing mafia. I am aware it happens, and that I am able to get involved in the same type of thing. (which I think I was also doing with Kimor).
They manage to slow the game down and other people will be come disinterested, which is what I think has happened here.
Spoke my mind.
Add in the fact that he double posts like every single frikkin time just to sign his name when we really don't care who made the post and if we did we would just ask.
Although the border between madness and genius is very narrow.
So no comment on the fact that Kimor's attack on Cheery stemmed from a false dichotomy, and then when called out on it, denies it entirely and then essentially uses a circular argument as a restatement of his case? And then when called out on that, returns to just ignoring me? No comment at all? Really?
-Majiffy
If you're not sheeping us, we're obviously not being sarcastic enough.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.