Micro 45 - Artemis Fowl Game Over

[shos]

I dunno; I read the books a loooong time ago(8 years +- I assume?), and only the first two.

[Shamrock]

I'm meh on the claim. For a reasonably important LEP character to be vanilla like that feels a bit off. The flavor's fine, but considering there is no vanilla pm in the first post I'd assume all scum have fake claims.

I know you can't quote but I want you to vaguely describe just the tone/point of view of the flavor. There's one thing in it that whether it's right or not is affected.

In the last Nexus game I played he allowed the scum to request fake role PMs, so I'm not sure examining the claim is going to be useful.

[shos]

Well based on the flavor here I'll guess that Artemis himself and Butler are the scumteam. that makes sense ya know :\

anyway - anyone can remind us who Grub Kelp is?

[shos]

Since that flavor doesn't match the books. Butler never killed a single person in the 1st book. He knocked some people out, but killing he never did.

http://artemisfowl.wikia.com/wiki/Grub_Kelp

it appears that the flavor is correct, and I misinterpretted it perhaps - english is not my mothertongue. in the wiki it says that bulter 'made short work of all of them but grub'. I said:

Anywsy im the nly one left, since butler killed everyone else or something. Dont remember any more flavor. The
Role is just a vt.

I pmed the mod about something.

[Nexus]

"Now before we get into anything, ladies, no scratching, no spitting and no tattling to mummy."

Votecount 1.6:

absta101 (3): Malakittens, Shamrock, shos
Guy_Named_Riggs (2): ProHawk, Mehdi2277
Shos (2): kmd4390, Robocopter87,
Shamrock (1): absta101

Not voting (2): Guy_Named_Riggs,

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. Day will end on Thursday 11th October 2012 at 11pm GMT.

Guy_Named_Riggs is being replaced.

[shos]

in my role pm the verb that is used is 'to take out' and not 'to make short work' so that is probably my mistake.

[shos]

meaning, I interpretted that as 'kill'...you understand..

[ProHawk]

UNVOTE: Guy_Named_Riggs

I will need to take some time to gather the evidence presented before I make my decision.

@Shos, does your role say you are the only one left or not?

[shos]

yep, from the LEPRetrieval one. I've already said that.

[ProHawk]

VOTE: shos

Aside from the slew of scummy posts, his reveal directly conflicts information I have in my role. I will have to defer to you all on if this evidence has any merit as I am not experienced enough to know if we can base conflicting flavor as being a made up role reveal.

[absta101]

@Shamrock

Okay, but you were soft-defending him and

you certainly weren't calling him scum

. And you gave no explanation for voting him at the time, and when pushed, the only explanation you gave was that you didn't believe his claim. What don't you believe about it?

1. The bolded is an outright lie.
2. Not giving an explanation "at the time" is scummy? Explain.

absta, you asked someone you thought was town to claim as a "reaction test" when he was at L-3 and then, when he claimed VT, you suddenly decided he was scum after all and voted him without an explanation.

I think you're choosing to "misunderstand" me. I was reaction fishing to see if anyone would take an opportunistic jump on me after I asked Shos to claim. I did NOT expect him to claim and I think he knew he wasn't L-1.

Zero percent of that makes sense from a town perspective.

Nor does it from a scum perspective it seems? I asked for scum motivation, answer me directly.
----

@Shos

- The reason I don't believe your claim is because it doesn't fit your behaviour this game. I believe your vote on me is survivalistic. PRs and scum are survivalistic.
VOTE: Shos
----

@Everyone

- I'm not for forcing another claim unless it's from Shamrock. Sho dies today.

[absta101]

VOTE: shos

Aside from the slew of scummy posts, his reveal directly conflicts information I have in my role. I will have to defer to you all on if this evidence has any merit as I am not experienced enough to know if we can base conflicting flavor as being a made up role reveal.

Keep your info hidden for now. I believe your town.

[absta101]

you're*

[Nexus]

ChaosOmega replaces Guy_Named_Riggs

[shos]

what.?
I want prohawk to reveal the flavor info that he has in his role immediately. I'm not taking a bullet like that based on a 'trust me'. that's just stupid.

if there's a cop, cop absta.
if there's a tracker, track kmd.
if there's a doc or a watcher - prohawk.
if absta survives the night, burn him tomorrow like gunpowder.

you guys have bullied the shit out of me this entire game with freakin no reason, no reason at all. end of AtE, off I go to other games.

pedit:
Chaos, opinion on absta and prohawk please.

[shos]

oh and pro, one last thing before I go, you should know that unless stated, flavor 99% of the time doesn't mean anything regarding the game. it just adds credibility to claims, the way I see it.

[shos]

If this was a fakeclaim I'd do it much, much better. check my meta - my themed fakeclaims are amazing. all except for the star trek one, lol.

[absta101]

what.?
I want prohawk to reveal the flavor info that he has in his role immediately. I'm not taking a bullet like that based on a 'trust me'. that's just stupid.

if there's a cop, cop absta.
if there's a tracker, track kmd.
if there's a doc or a watcher - prohawk.
if absta survives the night, burn him tomorrow like gunpowder.

you guys have bullied the shit out of me this entire game with freakin no reason, no reason at all. end of AtE, off I go to other games.

pedit:
Chaos, opinion on absta and prohawk please.

Directing PRs is scummy.

[ChaosOmega]

Hey everyone. Currently at work, but I should be able to fit in a read of the thread. Will have a real post within 8 hours.

[Shamrock]

@Shamrock

Okay, but you were soft-defending him and

you certainly weren't calling him scum

. And you gave no explanation for voting him at the time, and when pushed, the only explanation you gave was that you didn't believe his claim. What don't you believe about it?

1. The bolded is an outright lie.
2. Not giving an explanation "at the time" is scummy? Explain.

absta, you asked someone you thought was town to claim as a "reaction test" when he was at L-3 and then, when he claimed VT, you suddenly decided he was scum after all and voted him without an explanation.

I think you're choosing to "misunderstand" me. I was reaction fishing to see if anyone would take an opportunistic jump on me after I asked Shos to claim. I did NOT expect him to claim and I think he knew he wasn't L-1.

Zero percent of that makes sense from a town perspective.

Nor does it from a scum perspective it seems? I asked for scum motivation, answer me directly.

confirm vote absta

I know you're not actually this stupid.

[absta101]

Respond to everything I said properly.

[ProHawk]

The only thing I will say shos, is that I can confirm that you are not the only one alive in LEPretrieval.

[Shamrock]

absta, I will answer your terrible scumquestions if you tell me why you didn't believe shos's claim.

[absta101]

hmm. Would the mod give Shos a faulty fake claim???
Would scum Prohawk CC town Shos? No.
----

absta, I will answer your terrible scumquestions if you tell me why you didn't believe shos's claim.

1. The very fact that he claimed even though the VC was just above me.
2. His playstyle fits PR more than VT IMO.

[Shamrock]

Okay, but you were soft-defending him and

you certainly weren't calling him scum

. And you gave no explanation for voting him at the time, and when pushed, the only explanation you gave was that you didn't believe his claim. What don't you believe about it?

1. The bolded is an outright lie.

No.

2. Not giving an explanation "at the time" is scummy? Explain.

Did I say it was?

I think you're choosing to "misunderstand" me. I was reaction fishing to see if anyone would take an opportunistic jump on me after I asked Shos to claim. I did NOT expect him to claim and I think he knew he wasn't L-1.

Zero percent of that makes sense from a town perspective.

Nor does it from a scum perspective it seems? I asked for scum motivation, answer me directly.

Getting claims and mislynching?

---

not sure what to make of this claim business, will return later