Micro 50 (Vengeful Game Over)

[Om of the Nom]

Reverse OMGUS lol

[guille2015]

Pretty much

[N]

I like how anybody has yet to question my read on guille lol.

I don't need to. Scum team is [whoever I said earlier].

[guille2015]

Zoro: Is N scum?

[Zoroaster]

I like how anybody has yet to question my read on guille lol.

Could be that everyone knows it's sarcastic.

Zoro: Is N scum?

Not sure.

Still deciding between Om and N. Pretty sure in my Natural read--but it's a tad bit risky.

N is overall scummy--but that could just be him.

Om on the other hand has decided to answer just around every question in this game sarcastically.

I can understand if you give one sarcastic answer to one serious question.

But that's the only thing he's been doing. It's scummy due to the frequency.

[N]

So, Zoro, you think everyone is scum but you?

[Om of the Nom]

My guille read is not sarcastic at all.
I've only answered a few questions but I've given some of my own.
I tend not to take the game seriously as a whole anyway, since my main goal is to have fun in a non-destructive way.

*insert angsty teenager paragraph about how people don't get me and everything sucks wah wah wah*

[Zoroaster]

So, Zoro, you think everyone is scum but you?

Your counting skills are exquisite.

I tend not to take the game seriously as a whole anyway, since my main goal is to have fun in a non-destructive way.

There's a difference between "not taking the game seriously" and answering every question so far sarcastically.

[Om of the Nom]

There is no difference, you're strawmanning my repsponses to a few questions passed towards me. During early game I joke around a lot, while secretly forming reads with mah super awesome gut. This happens as either alignment (except as scum I'm obviously forming fake reads instead).

The worst part is, the only questions I've answered sarcastically are the ones that aren't even heavily game-related to begin with. I don't see why it's scummy at all.

[N]

So, Zoro, you think everyone is scum but you?

Your counting skills are exquisite.

I don't understand how you can go on and on about Om being sarcastic and how that makes him obv-scum, and then make posts like this.

While I don't think being sarcastic is anywhere near being a scum-tell, I find hypocrisy to be quite a big one.

[TheButtonmen]

Vote Count (1.2)

N :
Zoroaster (1): N
Om of the Nom (1): Natural_river
Natural_river (1): Zoroaster
guille2015 (1): Om of the Nom

Not Voting (1): guille2015

[guille2015]

River

: Do you still think that Om is scum? Is he the godfather?

[Natural_river]

I don't post for one day, and it seems like I missed a bit.
There isn't much to go by on who is the godfather.
I'll put a list down explaining what reads I have from all the players so far.

Guille : In my head leaning town, is not pointing fingers like crazy.
This can for some be a scumread, but to me it sounds like responsible playing, and
actually trying to nip the problem at the bud. Although I do wonder what his reads are so far.

N : Leaning scum, Mainly because of post 10, where he claims that I had a town read on zoroaster,
although I clearly never said that, I mentioned how I liked the use of logic.
I did ask a stupid question, but it was for the sake of discussion starting.
Understandable that he keeps thinking I'm 'pretending' to be a noob, but I am new to this game, and I
don't find asking questions about abbreviations is in any way suspicious.

Om of the nom: mainly seems to be joking around. It's possible that that is his game style, but still
leaning scum.

Zoroaster: My read on him is unclear, he did mention something about om of the nom being sarcastic, and then
answered sarcastic himself, like N noted, but I don't find that scummy at all.
I'll say leaning town for now.

[Zoroaster]

and then make posts like this.

There's a difference between answering something seriously that requires a serious answer, and then flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game.

[N]

Which questions in this game have required a serious answer?

[Zoroaster]

True--let me rephrase that.

There's a difference between answering something sarcastically every time and flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game.

[N]

Hang on, what are the two things that are different in this situation?

answering something sarcastically every time
vs.
flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game

What have those two things got to do with each other?

[Zoroaster]

Because I did it one time in comparison to many times?

[Zoroaster]

EWBOP: Also add in that it's not entirely a sarcastic answer because it didn't really answer the question anyway.

[N]

Oh, I think I understand now. The five people in the game bit was a further qualifier for both of them.

So it's more like:
answering something sarcastically every time when there's 5 people in the game
vs.
flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game

So you're saying Om is answering everything sarcastically and you're flaunting a sarcastic answer in my face? And that this is hugely different and therefore Om is scummy?

[Zoroaster]

My answer really has nothing to do with why Om is scummy, thanks.

[N]

Then what the fuck are you trying to say?

[Zoroaster]

What are you trying to say?

You've been trying to incriminate me on the basis that since I gave a sarcastic answer that therefore I'm going against my argument with Om. My answer has

nothing

to do with Om. My answer refers to me. I. Om's answer refers to him. He.

What you are trying to do is push the fallacy because I did it once that I'm as bad as Om who has committed the crime multiple times. Considering my answer was to put you toward the correct answer and Om's answers conceal his true nature--they are nothing alike.

[N]

No, I'm over the whole bullshit sarcastic thing. What I'm trying to figure out is what "there's a difference between answering something sarcastically every time and flaunting in someone's face when there's 5 people in the game" means.

[Zoroaster]

You saw that I quoted something with that right?

That just MIGHT have something to do with it.