In post 2615, Lastsurvivor wrote:I believe he is scum though. It wouldn't make much sense for the scum to leave him alive, since these last inspections could out a more villainous character, or a fake claim, etc. Also, I think he's experienced enough to consider the possibility that Pere is not necessarily cleared based on the facts.
It felt like he really, really wanted to convince us that Pere was cleared.
This makes me more suspicious of both him and Pere. I still want a Pere lynch, but I think MSH is a better move today.
In post 2629, Jal wrote:Throwing a vote on Michel asap doesn't make you look any more protown, guys
i don't think anyone said it did...
i doubt that he'll be quick-lynched as that would be a pretty stupid move, he needs to get in here and make his speech..
In post 2629, Jal wrote:Throwing a vote on Michel asap doesn't make you look any more protown, guys
i don't think anyone said it did...
i doubt that he'll be quick-lynched as that would be a pretty stupid move, he needs to get in here and make his speech..
Regardless, MS should be the vote for today
Jal: maybe, but I'm still doing it.
I have no intention to quicklynch; I'd pull my vote (temporarily) if we somehow got to N-1 without hearing from him.
However, he is currently my choice for lynch. Would consider Pere, but at the moment, that's about it.
I couldn't log in yesterday, and when I managed to check in just now, I didn't find any results pm in my inbox. The last time this happened was during night 5, when RachMarie blocked all actions. Back then, it wasn't that much of a problem, since I couldn't post in thread anyway as the problems with ckd's lack of actions submission were being dealt with. Still, I had to send a pm to the mod asking what happened to my investigation, which got confirmed the next time the mod posted. I really would have liked to see a pm telling me my result failed, though, since the uncertainty between the mod simply forgetting to send a result and the investigation failing is mightily annoying.
Anyway, I tried to investigate Lowman last night, because PoE is starting to point against the masons, and as I mentioned, I didn't get a result. Which is mightily strange, since mafia has lost both their roleblocker and their backup already. Perhaps they have some kind of one shot global investigation immunity or something? Either way, I'm getting the strong feeling I'm being set up here.
I couldn't log in yesterday, and when I managed to check in just now, I didn't find any results pm in my inbox. The last time this happened was during night 5, when RachMarie blocked all actions. Back then, it wasn't that much of a problem, since I couldn't post in thread anyway as the problems with ckd's lack of actions submission were being dealt with. Still, I had to send a pm to the mod asking what happened to my investigation, which got confirmed the next time the mod posted. I really would have liked to see a pm telling me my result failed, though, since the uncertainty between the mod simply forgetting to send a result and the investigation failing is mightily annoying.
Anyway, I tried to investigate Lowman last night, because PoE is starting to point against the masons, and as I mentioned, I didn't get a result. Which is mightily strange, since mafia has lost both their roleblocker and their backup already. Perhaps they have some kind of one shot global investigation immunity or something? Either way, I'm getting the strong feeling I'm being set up here.
In post 2638, MichelSableheart wrote: Perhaps they have some kind of one shot global investigation immunity or something? Either way, I'm getting the strong feeling I'm being set up here.
In post 2638, MichelSableheart wrote:Anyway, I tried to investigate Lowman last night, because PoE is starting to point against the masons,
MS,
We went with your plan yesterday of lynching from your suspect pool, so
why would you not investigate from within it? (me, Jal , or LS)
Especially me, considering this:
In post 2404, MichelSableheart wrote:The masons are confirming each other. Jal, Last Survivor and to a lesser extend Cheery Dog are townreads, when Sword still reads neutral. I'm almost certainly wrong about some townreads, but chances that Sword is scum are high
And this:
In post 2323, MichelSableheart wrote:I highly doubt that Iknal and Lucky would have found the time to set up a mason fakeclaim of Beavis and Butthead in a mafia quicktopic before day 1 started. Their activity throughout the game simply doesn't match that. Add that they are confirming each other, and I've never felt the need to investigate them. It seemed more important to me to focus on completely unconfirmed players.
Unconfirmed players from your POE pool yesterday (me, Jal, and LS, and Cheery):
Your target last night makes no sense, and all you are doing now is creating WIFOM with the masons…
Sword poses good questions in his last post...will wait for MSH to answer those before I vote since my vote would put him at L-1. Don't want quickhammers etc.
Poro why vote Seanald?
Game(s) where I have in fact been the last survivor, or been among the last survivors: 1
