Aunt Jemina replaces KrazyEyeKilla.
VC incoming.
In post 327, greygnarl wrote:In post 325, Malakittens wrote:Why don't we actually try lynching someone that looks scummy?
My name is Greygnarl and I endorse that message too. Just that since we can't agree, I'll tell you who's scummy. Daumis is. Let's kill'em.
In post 328, Tajun wrote:In post 317, andrew94 wrote:@tajun we got one pr killed already, why would we lynch another..
Andrew makes my list of people who aren't paying attention. Here is who I would like to lynch today:
least <--- SK, PR, VT, Maf ---> most.
Does that clear it up?
In post 324, greygnarl wrote:Why don't we lurkerlynch?
Because then we go into day 2 with no info?
I'm in for a Daumis lynch. He looks like newbie scum, and is hiding behind his beginner status to try to survive.
-Sketchy beginning.
-Pretended to give up hope.
-Post 24, softclaimed to relieve pressure.
-Post 56 pretended to have plan, involved him looking scummy. Refused to answer my question as to whether he knew his actions would look scummy.
-Post 61 OMGUS.
-Bunch of fluff, ludicrous questions to look helpful.
This is classic scum behaviour.
VOTE: Daumis123
In post 331, malpascp wrote:Nope. Daumis is just a newb. I won't do it unless deadline comes and noone else is lynchable. He is an almost empty slot, but I prefer to scumhunt (or try to) before going the easy way out. And people on his wagon just because he doesn't really now how a game is played here are just scummy.
Potato are you so desperate to have someone lynched that you don't even care anymore who it is? And that "lynch me if you have no choice" thing seems like you trying to get towncred.
In post 346, Jal wrote:In post 325, Malakittens wrote:Why don't we actually try lynching someone that looks scummy?
Who looks scummy to you beyond Om?
I'm not quite sure that Daumis is actually scum. He made the best case as to why we should lynch him though:
This is plan B if no one will find real scum, might as well take out the one who is quite questionable.
I just don't see him getting any better or helping out.
In post 380, greygnarl wrote:Uh, don't really think Potato qualifies as an "easy target".
In post 387, Voidedmafia wrote:
And I believe I mentioned that that vote was not counted as it violated rule 5c, where votes must be separate from all other text. I may have linked to the wrong post in the VC nearest that vote, but that is why.
In post 381, Hyperion wrote:Me no gusta. Its a rather pathetic excuse to hop back on a newbtowns bandwagon.