NY 159: RUST game over

PeregrineV · Post Post #1150 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:00 am

Seriously?

JOATs need to full claim exact abilities and results of said abilities in their next post. Otherwise, we lynch them all, either alphabetically or chronologically.

malpascp · Post Post #1151 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:00 am

Rob. Don't do that shit again.

Re-reading and placing a vote tomorrow, this thread seems how my facebook account would look if I had one.

P-Edit: rofl is right about me scum=claiming miller today. Even though he reached that conclusion way too fast. Meh.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1152 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:01 am

^ this.

We are all claiming now. Everyone's pretty much out as it is.

roflcopter · Post Post #1153 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:01 am

In post 1151, malpascp wrote:Even though he reached that conclusion way too fast. Meh.

what can i say i'm fucking brilliant

roflcopter · Post Post #1154 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:01 am

In post 1150, PeregrineV wrote:Seriously?

JOATs need to full claim exact abilities and results of said abilities in their next post. Otherwise, we lynch them all, either alphabetically or chronologically.

what the hell is wrong with you?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1155 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:02 am

In post 1148, roflcopter wrote:rob, here's the hole in your gambit

Lol. So you are ok with Rob gambiting. Fucking cognitive dissonance EVERYWHERE.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1156 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:04 am

Fuck I got an idea. Lynch the liar.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1157 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:04 am

Rob or me?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1158 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:05 am

Let's start with u

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1159 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:05 am

Rob I take it you targeted Malp last night?

malpascp · Post Post #1160 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:06 am

If you were fucking brilliant, I wouldn't think you are scum. But I do.

Pere logic is Ok, just suicidal town. Nothing important.

AP: I believe rofl didn't use "gambit" in that kind of way. Pretty sure.

CKD: Agreeded. Every single one of them. And rofl. Shooty. Anyone else who has a behaviour that is awkward even in Newbie games. Yep lets just kill everyone.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1161 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:06 am

In post 1148, roflcopter wrote:for fuck's sake, why do people feel this compulsion to lie as town

Soooooooo, care to explain why you said this?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1162 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:07 am

In post 1160, malpascp wrote:If you were fucking brilliant, I wouldn't think you are scum. But I do.

Who?

Rob14 · Post Post #1163 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:09 am

In post 1159, AngryPidgeon wrote:Rob I take it you targeted Malp last night?

No, CKD

malpascp · Post Post #1164 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:10 am

The person who said he was fucking brilliant aka rofl.

P-Edit: Results?

PeregrineV · Post Post #1165 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:11 am

In post 1163, Rob14 wrote:
In post 1159, AngryPidgeon wrote:Rob I take it you targeted Malp last night?

No, CKD

Gee, dribbles is so much funner.

So you targeted CKD last night, but not with Gunsmith.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1166 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:11 am

I need to sort this out in my head. But we are absolutely full claiming all actions today. There is no way that doesn't happen because:
1. Rob's shot didn't go through
2. Scum NK N1 didn't go through
3. CKD claims to have RB'd me (I will take the time to point out that doesn't outright clear me, but it means I didn't NK anyone)

P-edit: Yep, we are all full claiming Today.

roflcopter · Post Post #1167 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:11 am

In post 1155, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 1148, roflcopter wrote:rob, here's the hole in your gambit

Lol. So you are ok with Rob gambiting. Fucking cognitive dissonance EVERYWHERE.

strawman. your "gambit" is, with no prior indication of any suspicion of me whatsoever, claiming a guilty.

rob's is claiming a specific inconsistency with malp's claimed role and giving him the opportunity to change his claim. his is an exploratory effort (albeit one that i think was also fucking stupid to do), yours was a flat guilty claim.

In post 1161, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 1148, roflcopter wrote:for fuck's sake, why do people feel this compulsion to lie as town

Soooooooo, care to explain why you said this?

because rob just admitted he lied as town, and because in an ongoing game that i'm dead in (i think you know the one) someone claimed watcher as a vt and i'm just fucking tired of the stupidity. don't try to act like its even reasonable to assume i was talking about you.

malp wrote:If you were fucking brilliant, I wouldn't think you are scum. But I do.

you're wrong, or you're scum, either way i can't really help you at this point. you still think i'm scum despite the fact that i would have to have bussed two out of probably four total scum on day one and after that the scum team would have had to no killed just so i could later claim bulletproof. occam's razor is squarely against you.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1168 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:12 am

In post 1167, roflcopter wrote:rob's is claiming a specific inconsistency with malp's claimed role and giving him the opportunity to change his claim. his is an exploratory effort (albeit one that i think was also fucking stupid to do), yours was a flat guilty claim.

What, and Rob wasn't? He flat out said that Malp hasa gun and is therefore not a miller and is therefore scum. What are you even talking about?

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1169 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:13 am

In post 1167, roflcopter wrote:because rob just admitted he lied as town, and because in an ongoing game that i'm dead in (i think you know the one) someone claimed watcher as a vt and i'm just fucking tired of the stupidity. don't try to act like its even reasonable to assume i was talking about you.

Yes, but you are now voting me on the grounds I was lying while openly admitting that townies gambit. In fact, Rob just did. And you don't give 2 fucks about him.

roflcopter · Post Post #1170 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:14 am

In post 1168, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 1167, roflcopter wrote:rob's is claiming a specific inconsistency with malp's claimed role and giving him the opportunity to change his claim. his is an exploratory effort (albeit one that i think was also fucking stupid to do), yours was a flat guilty claim.

What, and Rob wasn't? He flat out said that Malp hasa gun and is therefore not a miller and is therefore scum. What are you even talking about?

malp is a claimed miller, rob fakeclaims something that says otherwise and vocally asks at least twice for malp to change his claim to vig if he wants to, but he doesn't

you just say "i got a guilty not giving more role info" and start a wagon on me, while i was still unclaimed

world
of
difference

Rob14 · Post Post #1171 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:14 am

In post 1160, malpascp wrote:CKD: Agreeded. Every single one of them. And rofl. Shooty. Anyone else who has a behaviour that is awkward even in Newbie games. Yep lets just kill everyone.

This made me lol quite a bit, and basically sums up my thoughts when two major town reads and a conf-town in Tazaro perform gambits and then someone says Lynch All Liars.

P-edit: Peregrine, it's not that difficult. I performed a gambit by saying I targeted Mal with gunsmith. In reality, I don't have gunsmith and did not target mal. I attempted to vig CKD and failed. I performed the gambit to test Mal's reaction because my read on him, based on a definitely town BC, was prob-town. His reaction passed with flying colors.

P-P-edit: I gave mal a chance, two actually, to claim vig, a role that has a gun but is town-based. I never said he was definite scum.

roflcopter · Post Post #1172 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:15 am

you know that i lynch lying townies on principle! fuck we just did it together in another game! you're being ridiculous!

Rob14 · Post Post #1173 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:16 am

OK, this argument is stupid town v town. Let's stop it.

Now, AP, ISO rofl and tell me why you decided to gambit on him (in the ISO) and construct I case for him being scum. Until you do, I'm ignoring this spam.

malpascp · Post Post #1174 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:16 am

AP. You are pretty much screwed. Don't do that gambit. Just die. Please.

P-Edit: @rofl: didn't read lol
stuff AP quoted from rofl is correct IMO, Rob is town.

Yes this is a Pre-Edit again: AP is scum. I'm placing my vote now. Rob is town, rofl could be hard bussing but dunno.

Vote: AngryPidgeon