FT 8 wrote:because he's not voting randomly during RVS
What makes you say this?
---
Dg 27 wrote:Bulder, the problem with your declaring you will vote the next random voter is that you are conducting a personality test, not progressing the game.
You are finding out which player or players in the roster will defiantly say F U and still cast a random vote.
In effect, you are casting a random vote for a different reason than a random die roll, or you have played with a player recently, which is how I usually assign my random votes.
Whoa. You just blew my mind. I mean, lol, how do you conjure up this stuff?
---
buld 29 wrote:My vote is not random, it is just out of my hands who meets the criterion for it.
I dislike this comment. Trying to separate yourself from the responsibility of your vote seems scummy.
buld 36 wrote:how are you going to analyze something that is random?
Because nothing is random. Well, that's the short answer anyways. The truth is more complicated than that, but suffice it to say that I think there's a purpose behind everything, even if it's to appear "random".
---
shos 39 wrote:I'll reveal why I'm voting you later in the day, probably.
Why conceal it?
---
Radelle 40 wrote:So many words without actually saying, doing, or revealing anything. Blah blah blah RVS whine blah blah everyone is null. Fantastic. I don't get how shos finds this a good post either.
I agree with this 100%. This is the exact impression I got from his post, I just didn't know how quite to word it. I liked how you cut through the bs.
---
Dg 59 wrote:Just because he said he had a reason doesn't mean I have to believe it. Just because you say he has a reason, doesn't make you not his scum buddy. Oh if only I had two votes. Hey....I declare the one vote per player phase over! Vo....don
Yeah, and now you're acting nervous. Radelle and buld are barking up the right tree, I think.
---
Abaddon 60 wrote:You just created a false dichotomy. Either he doesn't have a real reason (OMGUS) or you don't believe he has a reason. You've already decided without actually considering his actions.
Agreed. You should be voting him.
Abaddon 65 wrote:Wholesale piggy-backed on Declan's case in post 27. Your follow-up about ending RVS early gives us nothing to go on is obvious fact for any veteran and is a game theory argument, not relevant to Town vs Scum, and one that had been implicitly spoken by everyone speaking against Bulder's ultimatum.
I disagree. You don't think he's being sincere? I'd have liked it better if he admitted that, in retrospect, Dg's post was silly and unhelpful, but I think his
post 64 reads like he actually thought through the issue again for the better.
---
Fur 89 wrote:Radelle goes so far as to pretty much guarantee that he's town in a way that makes them look scummy
Ugh, I wish you weren't in this game, and I'm sure the feeling is mutual.
I should've known you'd hit up my two biggest townreads, but your accusations leave a lot to be desired. Where does Radelle "guarantee" she's town? Why is that a scumtell? Do you guarantee that you're town?
Fur 96 wrote:Obviously, I know what the difference here is. It feels like you're fishing for roles, and that's bullshit.
haha oh wow
You know damn well those are synonomous. Quit screwing around.
---
Dg 122 wrote:Come to think of it, shouldn't someone be asking ABSTA what his vote is about, rather than what I'm doing? L-3 and all.
Why don't you? You're voting him after all.
Dg 122 wrote:*sarcasm* Eek. Scum could quick hammer now, if they aren't on the wagon. *sarcasm*
How is that sarcastic? It's as if you put sarcasm tags around it to try and conceal the fact that you're pointing it out in a bit of a panic.
---
shos 124 wrote:I'm betting there's like at least 2 scum in the lurkerpool of
If the Mod is scum, we're all in trouble.
---
Fur 133 wrote:town doesnt have to be a townie
townie is finite
town is infinite in role variation, but where this is an open setup, it can either be townie, faith healer, yadda yadda yadda
So pedantic. So useless. How can you not see how lame this entire argument is? If you actually believed it was as serious of a slip as you claim, you'd be voting City.
Fur 138 wrote:are you uneducated, or kinda slippery when buzzed?
What, you're saying you don't remember how much joy we've had playing together in the past?
If you're saying you enjoy reading buld vs Dg, then we're even more different than I had thought.
---
absta 141 wrote:Why are you asking City if he sees it? Trying to convince the person you're accusing makes no sense.
Because he's scum.
I agree with you though.
---
Dg 144 wrote:Second post in the game, and feels the need to slip in a town claim? Has anyone even cast one vote on him?
*shrug*
Take it or leave it. It's true.
---
Aether 149 wrote:This game makes my eyes bleed for some reason, so forgive me for not being active.
I don't. You're scummy for lurking, ignoring the important arguments in this game, and for asking us to excuse that lurking when you are capable of doing more than X is X% town.
