What had me stumped was that I had placed everyone in pairs that were not likely to be scum together. I paired N and Zoroaster as an unlikely scum pair. Additionally that is why I changed my mind on Om. I thought that was clear. The fact that NR voted for Om early in the game, made me think that it would be impossible for NR to bus the godfather. But it wasn't a particularly strong threat and that's what Abaddon lead me to think about.
as for Whisker's latest post:
"His posting is limited and unhelpful. " I don't think you can say that after I went on the offensive.
" --and now that Om, the "one of them will flip scum", flipped scum, has turned to attack his other townread. " Well, what can I say. I have only attacked you once: In Post 197. This was actually me trying to get N riled up or to see if he would side with me hopeing that you would not respond. He didn't he reacted in a way I would not expect scum to react. The next full post of mine, I say: "The Only reason why I have not voted for you (whiskers) is because I have a gut feeling on N being the goon. " Reads change and people make mistake. And I am one that am willing to not be stubborn enough to think that I am always right.
However here is the kicker:
In post 151, Whiskers wrote:
#147, GuilleI don't know yet. Probably not Zoroaster, which leaves N and Om.
But: Let me put it this way. If you are the godfather, I don't need to know the second scum. If you are the goon, I will look for associative tells, as few as they will be. If you are town, you can shoot me.
Whisker clearly considers N and Om as more likely scum than Zoroster. Of course under the guise of (It doesn't matter who I vote for since they will kill each other) He votes for Abaddon (Zoroster's Slot). If he was town he would have voted the player that he thought was likely scum.