Micro 67 - The Rocky Horror Mafia Show - Game Over!

Yates · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:36 am

Shos has an avatar that looks like this:

Yates · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:37 am

New page! The above was to Expecto Patronum.

Zar · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:39 am

The pair of disembodied lips to mouth the words of

Science Fiction, Double Feature

was inspired by a Man Ray painting.

Day 1, Votecount 1

Yates (3): Johhog, Maestro, shos

Expecto Patronum (2): SnowStorm, Nobody Special
Johhog (1): Yates
Nobody Special (1): PiggyGal15
shos (1): Expecto Patronum
SnowStorm (1): Tammy

Not Voting (0): <3

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline

: November 8, 2012 11:30 AM New York Time. (GMT+4)

Countdown to deadline

: (expired on 2012-11-08 11:30:00)

shos · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:46 am

avatar...I'm with stupid ->

Expecto Patronum · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:28 am

Yeah ok shos, super glad I'm voting you xD

Tammy, storm.. join my wagon!!! NOW =D

Yates · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:53 am

My plan for the early game is simple. Jump on the biggest wagon that isn't me. Then point out why other people are stupid.

Seems legit.

Expecto Patronum · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:09 am

Yates, if Shos ever gives me a reason to stop voting him, or if at any time I just become plain old bored.. you'll be glad to know my vote is going to you =D

Yates · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:22 am

Thank God. Now I feel much more warm and fuzzy!

shos · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:24 am

stop voting me because I am town -_-;
vote yates.

Maestro · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:09 am

UNVOTE: Yates
VOTE: shos

It seems like I'm picking on him, but this is a serious vote.
shos is lying about something - votes please.

I will explain when/if he is forced to claim in-thread.

Maestro · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:10 am

Also, this does not out a Member of the Town when it happens, because I won't need a counterclaim to prove he's lying.

Yates · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:23 am

In post 34, Maestro wrote:shos is lying about something

Is it in post 33? Or earlier? [I'm also playing a card close to my vest - a 2 of Spades but who knows, right?]

shos · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:48 am

Yates · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:55 am

For me? Post 23. I have no idea what Maestro is talking about.

shos · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:21 am

what's with post 23? he asked if I have any particular reasona nd I said yes

that ???? was aimed at maestro, I have no idea what he's talking about either. we'll settle this eventually.

SnowStorm · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:22 am

In post 18, Expecto Patronum wrote:

In post 15, PiggyGal15 wrote:
In post 14, Tammy wrote:VOTE: snowstorm for starting the wagon on expecto.
Icy
what you're doing

ba dum tssss!

Piggy, do you even know why she made the
Icy
pun??

It looks like someone was trying to fit in...

In post 19, Expecto Patronum wrote:Why is this so quiet??? It's no fun lurking like this... -.-'

Tammy.. don't you have anything else to say?
Snow.. care to contribute a bit more?? Wanna start a speedlynch wagon on someone?? pretty please!!!!

I was starting yours, doesn't that count?

In post 34, Maestro wrote:UNVOTE: Yates
VOTE: shos

It seems like I'm picking on him, but this is a serious vote.

shos is lying about something
- votes please.

I will explain when/if he is forced to claim in-thread.

He's not town? He's not with stupid? I hope it's not both.

Expecto Patronum · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:29 am

In post 33, shos wrote:stop voting me because I am town -_-;
vote yates.

I disliked this post even before Maestro's weird post...

In post 34, Maestro wrote:UNVOTE: Yates
VOTE: shos

It seems like I'm picking on him, but this is a serious vote.
shos is lying about something - votes please.

I will explain when/if he is forced to claim in-thread.

In post 35, Maestro wrote:Also, this does not out a Member of the Town when it happens, because I won't need a counterclaim to prove he's lying.

This just got interesting... I highly doubt I'll agree to lynching someone other than Maestro or Shos... and right now I'm leaning Shos... hence I will continue voting him...

now... Maestro.. I'm VERY eager to hear what you have to say if we manage to make Shos claim... or if something else of the matter happens... although I wouldn't be comfortable with Shos claiming atm... so please don't...

Now maestro.. if shos never claims.. would you still vote him? or would you even care to explain?? If this outs a member of town I'm guessing it's you?? you are aware you might not survive the first night... either:

1. we lynch you
2. killers night kill you (note my plurarl.. because there is no way in hell this game is run with only 1 scum player)

if you are not dead by day 2 I'll be strongly encouraged to vouch for your lynch...

oh and yes.. I'm dead serious already....

Tammy and snow what are your thoughts??

shos · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:46 am

I voted Yates to add pressure on the wagon and see reactions. I always do that without reasoning.

gonna

Unvote

now since well, topic is different now

Maestro · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:55 am

Yeah, you're right Patronus. I'll probably not survive the Night and this point I'm a VT anyway so no point in holding off with this,
especially since I have shos caught in a lie.

CLAIM: Brad Majors

My role is essentially a "Town Neighborizer", with a slight limitation. I may propose to somebody on Day 1 and Day 1 only. If that person could pass as female, we become engaged, get a QT, and may talk there for as long as we both are alive.

If they cannot pass as female, or if they are indisputably male, the proposal will fail.

I proposed to shos right off the bat, mainly because I wasn't too sure what the point of doing otherwise was...but it turns out a series of lucky mistakes came into play.

1) I proposed a dual Roleclaim in the QT, shos agreed.
2) He casually asked about how the QT came about, but I was too busy with other stuff/not paying attention, and didn't tell him specifics about it.
3) I claimed Brad Majors to him first.

Then he claimed Dr. Everett Scott to me.

Everyone should be able to see why this outs him as fakeclaiming Scum. My proposal to him was successful, which means that shos's Role must be one that "could pass as female". Thus he could not be Dr. Everett Scott. I'm assuming that the "pass as female" modifier exists to account for the aliens Magenta and Columbia, who're technically not human females but could (and usually are) considered as such when the show is cast/the movie is viewed. Thus it is almost incontrovertible that shos is one of these two Roles. Since my Role PM (and I'm guessing all other Town-aligned ones) says that we win when all threats to the humans are eliminated, we can assume that the aliens are the Scumteam and therefore that shos is Scum. The only other possibilities are 1) that shos is Dr. Frankenfurter, who could in some universe be considered female, since the character is about as messed up as you could get in terms of gender OR 2) that shos is Janet Weiss, but that would mean he is Town-aligned and would have no reason to lie to me about his Role.

Lying Scum is caught right out of RVS. Vote shos please.

shos · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:00 am

do not vote me. pmed a question to the mod.

Maestro · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:03 am

Also, in our QT he just claimed an active ability that is called: "I can see that you are an......ticipating"
which in no way matches anything related to Dr. Everett Scott. It is however, an almost perfect transcription of one of Dr. Frankenfurter's lines from the movie/show.

He claims this active ability gives him some control over time, and if this is so it also more closely matches Dr. Frankenfurter or one of the other aliens than it does Dr. Everett Scott.

shos, if you actually are Town I apologize for this, but you have to understand what a huge impossibility this is to me right now.
My Role PM clearly states that the proposal would fail if used on a male. The Role you claimed is obviously male.

P-Edit: What question?

shos · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:13 am

Yes yes I know I know and I understand. you should know that I'm not lying tho. I'll update you in the QT when the mod answers me, and then well, we'll see how the public game progresses.

Maestro · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:17 am

Mmmmmhmmmmm.

PiggyGal15 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:41 am

In post 40, SnowStorm wrote:
In post 18, Expecto Patronum wrote:

In post 15, PiggyGal15 wrote:
In post 14, Tammy wrote:VOTE: snowstorm for starting the wagon on expecto.
Icy
what you're doing

ba dum tssss!

Piggy, do you even know why she made the
Icy
pun??

It looks like someone was trying to fit in...

I thought it was a pun about ice, and it's

snow

storm so yeah... I'm Canadian... there's already snow on the ground, so I'm allowed to try and laugh off the pain

I'm a sad panda.

I was trying to fit in ... I'm not loved enough >.<

Expecto Patronum · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:48 am

In post 43, Maestro wrote:Yeah, you're right Patronus. I'll probably not survive the Night and this point I'm a VT anyway so no point in holding off with this,
especially since I have shos caught in a lie.

CLAIM: Brad Majors

My role is essentially a "Town Neighborizer", with a slight limitation. I may propose to somebody on Day 1 and Day 1 only. If that person could pass as female, we become engaged, get a QT, and may talk there for as long as we both are alive.
If they cannot pass as female, or if they are indisputably male, the proposal will fail.
I proposed to shos right off the bat, mainly because I wasn't too sure what the point of doing otherwise was...but it turns out a series of lucky mistakes came into play.

1) I proposed a dual Roleclaim in the QT, shos agreed.
2) He casually asked about how the QT came about, but I was too busy with other stuff/not paying attention, and didn't tell him specifics about it.
3) I claimed Brad Majors to him first.
Then he claimed Dr. Everett Scott to me.

Everyone should be able to see why this outs him as fakeclaiming Scum. My proposal to him was successful, which means that shos's Role must be one that "could pass as female". Thus he could not be Dr. Everett Scott. I'm assuming that the "pass as female" modifier exists to account for the aliens Magenta and Columbia, who're technically not human females but could (and usually are) considered as such when the show is cast/the movie is viewed. Thus it is almost incontrovertible that shos is one of these two Roles. Since my Role PM (and I'm guessing all other Town-aligned ones) says that we win when all threats to the humans are eliminated, we can assume that the aliens are the Scumteam and therefore that shos is Scum. The only other possibilities are 1) that shos is Dr. Frankenfurter, who could in some universe be considered female, since the character is about as messed up as you could get in terms of gender OR 2) that shos is Janet Weiss, but that would mean he is Town-aligned and would have no reason to lie to me about his Role.

Lying Scum is caught right out of RVS. Vote shos please.

Edited the Image out...

ohh and btw.. I <3 YOU.. it's time for some serious analysis.. yeah.. everyone should vote shos.. but wait.. let's not lynch and see what happens...

oh and if we have healing powers please do not claim or say anything otherwise and heal brad tonight...

ohh and another thing... janet could be scum.. I don't think the person's name or alignment in the movie are indicators of scum.. I mean it wouldn't make sense...

working on something right now...