In post 398, Pandorica wrote:In post 353, Epic wrote:I think the reason the reads aren't coming easy for me this game is because it's basically filled with either ultra serious posters that come off as contrived in their reasoning tonally, players who behave in a relatively scripted fashion, gimmick accounts, or all of the above at once.
which of these categories am i?
In post 387, Titan wrote:Noir...did you not realize that Titan and Arthur were part the same people. Probably makes you townies for that actually.
In post 401, Cheery Dog wrote:This is bugging me as I don't get it and it's going to remain on my concesus for at least the rest of this RL day if not the the game day.
In post 360, SoraAdvent wrote:hello. should be obvious what typing quirk I'm using. anyway, I see nothing so far in terms of reads. it's all very confusing so far, and Robo's selfvote just makes it all the more confusing. i'll wait an IRL day or so and get back with some reads.
In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4447223#p4447223]post 254[/url], Paschendale wrote:In post 171, Alsark wrote:Not sure how I'm supposed to use my power of converting people into vanilla townies during confirmation phase if we can't talk during confirmation phase.
This is what stood out to me the most. A roleclaim before the game had even started?And an extremely town-aligned role to claim.Sounds fishy to me.
Vote: Alsark
In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4447773#p4447773]post 301[/url], BroodKingEXE wrote:Combatenigma and nacho voting for Noir and calling each other scum is pretty scummy. Noir hasn't even started the game, so I dont know how they expect him to step up his game.
In post 402, DeasVail wrote:In post 401, Cheery Dog wrote:This is bugging me as I don't get it and it's going to remain on my concesus for at least the rest of this RL day if not the the game day.
Why did you need to post this part? It suggests to me that you thought there was something wrong with asking the question. If so, what was wrong with it?
In post 406, Cheery Dog wrote:Because I don't like pying into reasons behind other people's townreads
In post 398, Pandorica wrote:In post 353, Epic wrote:I think the reason the reads aren't coming easy for me this game is because it's basically filled with either ultra serious posters that come off as contrived in their reasoning tonally, players who behave in a relatively scripted fashion, gimmick accounts, or all of the above at once.
which of these categories am i?
In post 397, Pandorica wrote:In post 378, Noir wrote:titan can be town for now for post 244 among others
paschendale copping out on diddling his dick in 254 and 255; 255 is kind of nice but it looks like an afterthought, which saps its merit. actually post 254 was just inexcusably bad. it just sucked, it sucks
xtopherusd gets a free pass for autistically formatted Post Sundaes
torgonitoh should be force-replaced for being a cancer
post 277, god ser arthur dayne really sucks dick, i'm sorry to invoke the dick but he really sucks. man
vifam and porfervor are cool so they can stay
vote sticks; combinatorialenigma's vote for me was horrible and so was post 223 http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4446862 everyone please read this stupid post
you're bad.
In post 396, Pandorica wrote:
explain your wutloski read arthur? if it's the gimmick it was obvious from the sign up thread he was gonna run a gimmick don't see how that's useful
In post 355, Titan wrote:Would it be wrong if it's partly be ause his avatar bugs me? Thats stupid and i dont even know why. Like I get the relaxed bit because he actually does come off relaxed. I not like the jump on nacho and his unvoting of Phil reads off to me.
Pedit: to epic about vifam
In post 360, SoraAdvent wrote:hello. should be obvious what typing quirk I'm using. anyway, I see nothing so far in terms of reads. it's all very confusing so far, and Robo's selfvote just makes it all the more confusing. i'll wait an IRL day or so and get back with some reads.
In post 363, DeasVail wrote:Urgh, too many pages!
Sunman is badman because he was trying to be all chatty and town in the earlier part of the confirmation phase, but wasn't actually. I'm not voting sunman though, because Qman is evilman, not badman.
Does anyone know if xtoph usually does the defending himself hardcore thing?
Robo, I thought you were town, but your self-vote seems pretty unnatural.
And alsark is amazing.
D: but he doesn't like me! Well he's no longer amazing or town then. By the way, I thought I'd be voting for Alduskkel or however you spell it. And epic, that explanation would have been too obvious. Clearly, if I didn't want a sense of mystery surrounding my post, I would have just sad who I planned to vote for? Also, my meta = gets lynched as town. Ooo, and DeasFail is better.
And paschendale, it's the ones not worthy of much attention that are scum. Well maybe not always, but yeah...
Also he's kind of scummy, but I'm not sure about the thinking Alsark's claim was real thing yet. Eh, NumberQ is still a fine wagon anyway.
In post 399, Pandorica wrote:Actually every cheery dog post seems super forced so far and like he doesn't know how to settle. He's probably scum. Voting from a phone is a pain but you should all vote him.
