Mafiastuck (GAME OVER TOWN WINS!)

Porfervor · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 pm

why you're at it your previous vote on Noir you didnt even explain or give a conclusion, instead you gave a snarky remark about his style of posting when i could honestly say noir is doing a better job at explaining things than you right now Paschendale

Also that previous votes happens to be voting you also and it's like you didn't even care

legitimately laughing at this

Cheery Dog · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:45 pm

Why does me not being vigged become problematic?
We'd be better of lynching me than vigging me (or the best option is to not kill me at all)

Pandorica · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:47 pm

In post 676, Cheery Dog wrote:Why does me not being vigged become problematic?

you cannot be this dense

Porfervor · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:47 pm

okay time to end the day let's go lynch this my argument is full proof no more discussion from this point forward get on this and or get run over from the hype train choo choo motherfucker

Pandorica · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:48 pm

robocopter make yourself useful if you're around and vote paschendale to speed this up

Porfervor · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:49 pm

btw my other head can suck a nut for coming in here and trying to get authority over me bitch please i run this

DeasVail · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:34 pm

Unvote

for now.

ActionDan · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 6:55 pm

from an iso with little-to-no context I'm leaning town on Sunshine and Rainbows

Epic · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:06 pm

In post 682, ActionDan wrote:from an iso with little-to-no context I'm leaning town on Sunshine and Rainbows

cool story bro

BT · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:15 pm

In post 647, Pandorica wrote:
In post 586, BT wrote:Gonna have to ask Pandorica how sure he is on the "Robo wouldn't have the balls" claim @ #396.

Fairly sure? I don't really know what you want me to say. I'd not have said it, if I wasn't reasonably confident.

Well I wanted to make sure if it was

"there's NO WAY this guy is scum with his meta"
or
"i don't

think

he's scum with his meta"

In other news I guess the Q wagon isn't getting any support.

Pacsh's #657 is "don't lynch meeeee" bad.

The wagon is speeding up real fast but that's kind of understandable really.

Sure.

UNVOTE: numberQ
VOTE: Pacshendale

BT · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:19 pm

I think we're at 11 votes?

DeasVail · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:50 pm

Well yes, I suppose I support a Paschendale wagon.

Sunshine and Rainbows · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:40 pm

In post 657, Paschendale wrote:Seriously? Lynch the kinda quiet guy? That's your plan? People shout back and forth and fill the thread with fluff and when someone reads what you've posted and reacts, you try to kill him? Why are you playing this way if you don't want people to react to it? Why aren't you killing Nacho? He's doing the exact same thing except not even voting. He just says "hmmm, that's interesting." I'm reaching actual conclusions.

I don't think anyone has voted you for being 'quieet'. It's more because of how forced you sound, and uh, this frantic WHY NACHO AND NOT ME really doesn't help your case. Should we be voting Nacho? I don't think that's who you're voting right now, so maybe you should explain your suspicion a little further. Alternatively vote yourself. *thumbs up!*

Dan: Damn straight you are now sheep me like a good pawn.

Phillammon · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:45 pm

As I agreed earler, with you guys on pasch, willing to vote but I'll wait for a count.

BT · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:04 am

In post 687, Sunshine and Rainbows wrote:gRRR

Has your other head posted in the last few days? Curious. #594 looks like you wrote it together, actually.

In post 618, BT wrote:Robocopter do you happen to have reads? Plural.

Fully expecting Robocopter to respond with reads in his next post.

In post 688, Phillammon wrote:As I agreed earler, with you guys on pasch, willing to vote but I'll wait for a count.

Unofficial "Just for You" Count:

In post 614, quadz08 wrote:
Votecount 1.4

Paschendale (4): Zeta, Sunshine and Rainbows, AurorusVox, Titan

In post 637, malpascp wrote:
unvote, Vote: Paschendale

In post 643, Pandorica wrote:
Unvote, vote paschendale

In post 644, Cheery Dog wrote:
UNVOTE: ]
VOTE: paschendale

In post 661, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Paschendale

In post 663, Noir wrote:
unvote
vote: paschendale

In post 669, Porfervor wrote:
Vote: Paschendale

In post 684, BT wrote:UNVOTE: numberQ
VOTE: Pacshendale

Paschendale (11): Xeta, Sunshine and Rainbows, AurorusVox, Titan, malpascp, Pandorica, Cheery Dog, Nachomamma8, Noir, Porfervor, BT

Your move.

Sunshine and Rainbows · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:39 am

Manju hasn't been on yet no. I think I keep missing him because I keep falling asleep around 6pm >x>

Phillammon · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:23 am

K. I'm not gonna put him above L-2, which is why I asked. VOTE: Pasch

Paschendale · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:42 am

I legit have no idea how you guys are finding me scummy here. I'm really completely at a loss for how you discern alignment out of a game so stuffed with garbage that nobody even looks like they're trying.

I'll just replace out and you guys can play with someone who understands how these big games work. And I'll probably avoid them in the future. They're not nearly as fun for me as I thought they would be.

Mod: I'd like to be replaced.

ActionDan · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:50 am

S&R: I wasn't ready to sheep the wagon last night kind since the quality of posts voting him alone independant of reasons for the votes looked like crap.

After the gentleman's draw two of our chess teams agreed upon today I'll be able to give a proper read-through past page 10.

Pandorica · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:17 am

In post 692, Paschendale wrote:I legit have no idea how you guys are finding me scummy here. I'm really completely at a loss for how you discern alignment out of a game so stuffed with garbage that nobody even looks like they're trying.

I'll just replace out and you guys can play with someone who understands how these big games work. And I'll probably avoid them in the future. They're not nearly as fun for me as I thought they would be.

Mod: I'd like to be replaced.

waht.

This is so out of order, whatever your alignment. I'd push it to almost confirm you as scum giving up though.

Cheery Dog · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:25 am

In games this size and this early, who is found the most scummy is probably mostly random, even though were well past rvs

Pandorica · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:27 am

Stop posting

Pandorica · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:31 am

that was mean Nexus

Vifam · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:31 am

Cheery Dog wrote:In games this size and this early, who is found the most scummy is probably mostly random, even though were well past rvs

It's like you're not even in the game

Pandorica · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:32 am

In post 644, Cheery Dog wrote:
In post 637, malpascp wrote:ISO Pasch and laugh. Please just do it.

unvote, Vote: Paschendale

I don't think I need to iso him for that to happen.
UNVOTE: ]
VOTE: paschendale

In post 695, Cheery Dog wrote:In games this size and this early, who is found the most scummy is probably mostly random, even though were well past rvs

although really it looked like you were super confident when you first voted him and 'didn't need to iso him' but now it's mostly random but w/e you're just going to respond in a way that infuriates me so w/e