Listen what is reason to vote against Rathyr? Seriously none he is on Towns side which is good, if he doesnt lie that is.
Uh...Are you dumb, or what.
I'm sorry. Is this argument seriously "Don't vote for Rathyr because he's pro-town, if he's telling the truth"?Eon wrote:Listen what is reason to vote against Rathyr? Seriously none he is on Towns side which is good, if he doesnt lie that is. So why do you people vote against him? I suggest people to re-think their actions.
Oh, yes didnt think about those type of roles...well my bad here. Fine then i will look at things more.Fuldu wrote:I'm sorry. Is this argument seriously "Don't vote for Rathyr because he's pro-town, if he's telling the truth"?Eon wrote:Listen what is reason to vote against Rathyr? Seriously none he is on Towns side which is good, if he doesnt lie that is. So why do you people vote against him? I suggest people to re-think their actions.
As for the testing suggestion, there aren't that many roles that could target Rathyr in a way that would be obvious to the entire town. Cop, only known to the person who targeted him. Doc, not even known to the person who targeted him. Roleblocker, potentially known to the randomized target, but potentially not. Vig, usually known to the entire town, but not easily identifiable in this instance, since the randomized kill isn't necessarily going to be distinguishable from any other kills. I haven't looked through the entire role list, but I don't think it's as simple as you're suggesting, Rathyr.
Is that possible? If you ARE goo, then the person who tested you would be put in a trap and thus he himself would be lynched as well. No one wants to run the risk of becoming goo, because then they can't perform night actions in the future (actually, I'd like to be sure I'm correct here --does a goo lose all previous powers?). The testing idea wouldn't really work in this case.Rathyr wrote:Rathyr wrote:If you really think I am goo then just designate a single player to test me in a fashion that isobvious to the whole game whether it worked or not.
Hello!
Scummy indecisiveness, trying to keep your options open. You continue to vote Cadre, but make weak comments about Rathyr seeming scummy so that you have an out if he turns into a better target.Thestatusquo wrote:I think that cadre continues to look...off in my eyes. Maybe not truely scummy, but enough to keep my vote for now. Rathyr is pushing WAY too hard this early on day 1, so depending on his actions in the future I may feel compelled to switch votes to him.
Thestatusquo wrote:I personally buy the claim. It's way too strong to be a fake claim, imho.
Nice about-face once you realised you still had a good shot at lynching a potentially powerful pro-town player (hurray for alliteration). His handling of "the goo possibility" wasn't scummy at all, you just wanted an excuse to keep voting him.Thestatusquo wrote:Unvote, Vote: rathyrHis handling of the goo possibility has convinced me that he very well may be it.
Fine. You're not worried about Rathyr being Goo (and testing for that "at some point in the game" is a horrible idea. We either test it now or we risk being overrun). What about Rathyr being a Bus Driver? He takes himself as one of the players targeted and fakes the appearance of a Nexus.Yosarian2 wrote:The way I see it, Rathyr's claim would be almost impossible for a scum to fake. The possibily that he might be black goo is worrying, but that dosn't really seem all that likely to me, and could still be tested at some point in the game with a claimed vig or something.
At this point, I tend to believe Rathyr that he's the nexus, at least believe him enough to wait and subject him to tests. It's almost always a bad idea to lynch someone with a testable claim on day 1. I am still waiting to see if the mods'll say if there's a posibility of a scum nexus of some type.