Open 465 - Wot's... Uh the Deal? (Game Over! Town Win!)

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:37 pm

alright, will be back in a bit with thoughts.

Vote Count

Pirate Mollie (L-3): Shrimp85, ProHawk
Shrimp85 (L-3): Pirate Mollie, Adam-12

, Malakittens

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline is Monday, December 17, 2012 at 12:40 PM EST

Adam-12 · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:41 pm

@Mollie: What is your read on Hawk so far?

pirate mollie · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:46 pm

In post 76, Adam-12 wrote:@Mollie: What is your read on Hawk so far?

null since all he is doing is trying to provoke me.

Adam-12 · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:47 pm

So you guys have played together before?

pirate mollie · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:58 pm

not to my knowledge but paranoid me does not discount alts.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:07 pm

looks like a scummy question:

In post 26, Adam-12 wrote:@Levi: Why did you prolong the pre-game?

inferring that that was indeed what leviathan did.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:08 pm

is this a question for the sake of a question?

In post 27, Adam-12 wrote:@Shrimp: So is your vote serious or not, I can't seem to tell...

ProHawk · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:09 pm

No, first time together. Adam, whats your read on mollie?

Adam-12 · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:11 pm

In post 81, Mantisdreamz wrote:is this a question for the sake of a question?

In post 27, Adam-12 wrote:@Shrimp: So is your vote serious or not, I can't seem to tell...

If you read his vote post he at the same time mentions his vote as RVS in a playful manner & as a serious vote for a scum tell. I hold that as disingenuous voting where he can swing responsibility both ways. So, no not a useless question at all.

Adam-12 · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:14 pm

In post 82, ProHawk wrote:No, first time together. Adam, whats your read on mollie?

I don't like the process she went through to vote Levi and if she is scum I read her as very calm and collected scum. Her demeanor would indicate that is possible for her.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:20 pm

In post 82, ProHawk wrote:No, first time together. Adam, whats your read on mollie?

I would be interested in this as well.

Adam-12 · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:21 pm

Which reminds me:

@Mollie: Why did you switch your vote from Levi?

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:24 pm

In post 83, Adam-12 wrote:
In post 81, Mantisdreamz wrote:is this a question for the sake of a question?

In post 27, Adam-12 wrote:@Shrimp: So is your vote serious or not, I can't seem to tell...

If you read his vote post he at the same time mentions his vote as RVS in a playful manner & as a serious vote for a scum tell. I hold that as disingenuous voting where he can swing responsibility both ways. So, no not a useless question at all.

It looked like shrimp maybe voted molly just as a joke at first. but then, when it was brought to his attention that malakitten was actually serious about her vote on leviathan for not confirming right away, and then saw molly's post where she somewhat furthered the idea by asking mala if it was because she thought leviathan wanted more time in pre scum chat... then his vote turned to a serious one.

i don't know if that makes sense.

guess what i'm trying to say is that i don't find shrimp all that suspicious. and i am wondering about molly myself.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:26 pm

though Adam, i do think it's a bit scummy to be asking multiple players how long they have played mafia before. it could be a normal thing to ask... but, it kind of appears like simple questions to ask and kind of seem like filler posts

Adam-12 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:28 pm

Not at all. In both cases valuable information was concluded from that question.

Adam-12 · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:30 pm

In post 87, Mantisdreamz wrote:
In post 83, Adam-12 wrote:
In post 81, Mantisdreamz wrote:is this a question for the sake of a question?

In post 27, Adam-12 wrote:@Shrimp: So is your vote serious or not, I can't seem to tell...

If you read his vote post he at the same time mentions his vote as RVS in a playful manner & as a serious vote for a scum tell. I hold that as disingenuous voting where he can swing responsibility both ways. So, no not a useless question at all.

It looked like shrimp maybe voted molly just as a joke at first. but then, when it was brought to his attention that malakitten was actually serious about her vote on leviathan for not confirming right away, and then saw molly's post where she somewhat furthered the idea by asking mala if it was because she thought leviathan wanted more time in pre scum chat... then his vote turned to a serious one.

i don't know if that makes sense.

guess what i'm trying to say is that i don't find shrimp all that suspicious. and i am wondering about molly myself.

Did you read the link that Mala provided about this?

leviathan93 · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:34 pm

I apologize and want to clarify my use of the term "blacksmith" It was an expression I was using to show a just a townsperson. nothing special about them. i could have said baker, or candlestick maker.

Malakittens · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:35 pm

Levi, are you from another mafia site?

Malakittens · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:37 pm

Unvote: Shrimp

Wait, thinking this over. I want responses to my post from Shrimp though..

Adam-12 · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:39 pm

@Mantis: Or let me put it another way, you don't think scum would not confirm because they are chatting in the Q/T & would be otherwise occupied? Isn't it a reasonable motivation for ultimately falling asleep instead of confirming?

ProHawk · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:44 pm

@Adam, so you don't believe Leviathan's explanation?

Adam-12 · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:50 pm

Well, lets let everyone settle in so we can discuss it.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:59 pm

In post 90, Adam-12 wrote:
In post 87, Mantisdreamz wrote:
In post 83, Adam-12 wrote:
In post 81, Mantisdreamz wrote:is this a question for the sake of a question?

In post 27, Adam-12 wrote:@Shrimp: So is your vote serious or not, I can't seem to tell...

If you read his vote post he at the same time mentions his vote as RVS in a playful manner & as a serious vote for a scum tell. I hold that as disingenuous voting where he can swing responsibility both ways. So, no not a useless question at all.

It looked like shrimp maybe voted molly just as a joke at first. but then, when it was brought to his attention that malakitten was actually serious about her vote on leviathan for not confirming right away, and then saw molly's post where she somewhat furthered the idea by asking mala if it was because she thought leviathan wanted more time in pre scum chat... then his vote turned to a serious one.

i don't know if that makes sense.

guess what i'm trying to say is that i don't find shrimp all that suspicious. and i am wondering about molly myself.

Did you read the link that Mala provided about this?

no, i don't think i did

leviathan93 · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:01 pm

nope. never heard of mafia until the 13th and a friend helped me a create an account on the fourteenth.

Mantisdreamz · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:03 pm

In post 94, Adam-12 wrote:@Mantis: Or let me put it another way, you don't think scum would not confirm because they are chatting in the Q/T & would be otherwise occupied? Isn't it a reasonable motivation for ultimately falling asleep instead of confirming?

I wouldn't really think so. Scum don't want to look obvious. they will look obvious by avoiding the thread and even avoiding it initially.