In post 461, Konowa wrote:Why are you using dead scum to connect to partner instead of the actions of N or I to Equinox and see which is more likely to make sense?
Are you saying to just completely ignore dead scums' actions? I think you should take both (how dead scum acted and how people acted towards them) into consideration, but this is getting into Mafia Theory.
I'll do what you suggest, though, and go through your posts.
In post 126, Konowa wrote:If IG is scum, I think it's pretty clear that Equinox is his partner due to the timing of her vote switch.
Now that we know both Equinox's and IceGuy's alignments, this looks like you're trying to clear Equinox of being scum by tying her to the most likely mislynch of the day. Once he had flipped town, you quite easily could have gone "well, that clears Equinox."
In post 283, Konowa wrote:DV, why myk over IG?
I'm having a hard time swallowing IG and mykonian both as scum.
Again, now knowing both IceGuy's and mykonian's are both town, this looks like you're saying "there's one scum in this pair; let's lynch one and if they flip town, lynch the other."
In post 345, Konowa wrote:Need to go read N and Riot as it pertains to Equinox and IceGuy and see what makes the most sense.
Once you realised Equinox was about to be lynched, you tried to tie her to me.
In post 462, Konowa wrote:For what it's worth, my play at the very beginning of D4 should show I'm not Equinox's partner. There is no reason for me as scum to come out and vote her like that in a lylo situation .
You mean this?
In post 334, Konowa wrote:Vote: Equinox
I'll explain if I have to, but with no factional communication she is pretty obvscum.
Your vote was on Equinox for only two and a half hours, no one else commented in between, and you knew there was nothing to worry about because town don't quicklynch.
