Gay Mafia II: RIDE THE LIGHTNING (Game Over)

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:52 pm

If there's any scum in your QT it's Kawaii and/or SDB.

Pretentiousdra · Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:53 pm

who the fuck is SDB.

and no I think I trust my scumdar over your retardar.

dramonic · Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:53 pm

In post 1026, Pretentiousdra wrote:who the fuck is SDB.

i'm assuming a typoed SlumperPartyBoyz

zoraster · Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:54 pm

Going to go have posture problems somewhere else?

Pretentiousdra · Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:54 pm

that's one hell of a typo

dramonic · Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:55 pm

In post 1028, zoraster wrote:Going to go have posture problems somewhere else?

It's a double typo, they cancel each other to make it the secret proper spelling.

zoraster · Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:02 pm

er. I thought I was on the latest page and thought I was responding to OD:

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:08 pm

In post 1031, zoraster wrote:er. I thought I was on the latest page and thought I was responding to OD:

oh u

kuribo · Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:21 pm

In post 1021, dramonic wrote:

i dont get it

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:22 pm

In post 1020, Pretentiousdra wrote:that's a hoot

Pretentiousdra · Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:29 pm

JacobSavage · Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:31 pm

In post 970, Kawaii wrote:(Just a quick note of amusement before I go off to study, everyone competent that's not scum sans nacho and kuribo are voting Fate).

VIs need to learn their place.

This is just..... terrible
1. Using n argument that a certain group of people obviously know what they are doing is just sc ummy as fuck.
2. Then restricting the category to include only players you don't think are scum is silly, i don't think this needs explaining.
3. Them having 2 exceptions is scummy as it's either t
trying to build a case out of nothing OR its making exceptions to prove a rule.

dramonic · Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:35 pm

Trying to reason with kats proves something else entirely.

Quilford · Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:44 pm

Iecerint · Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:10 pm

OK FINALLY READING AND IT'S ON PAGE 42.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:10 pm

@Everyone on the Wyrd wagon: Who would you go after tomorrow if Wyrd got lynched today and flipped town? What if he flipped scum?

DeltaWave · Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:11 pm

In post 922, Ythan wrote:
unvote vote wyrd

Delta why the Phydra vote right then?

I'm not a fan of arguments that boil down to "trust me"

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:57 pm

In post 1040, Om of the Nom wrote:@Everyone on the Wyrd wagon: Who would you go after tomorrow if Wyrd got lynched today and flipped town? What if he flipped scum?

Let's not give the scum a roadmap to the most productive NK.

Ythan · Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:32 pm

In post 960, Kawaii wrote:Well we wern't planning on outing the hydra QT JUST YET but well scumFate decided he'd out it first to try and get the jump on us so.

Why would you hide this?

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:34 pm

Because every single hydra is scum except Wyrd who is the lone innocent townie in the QT.

Ythan · Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:36 pm

In post 971, BT wrote:
In post 926, Ythan wrote:I haven't been voting wyrd today because the wyrd wagon was bad sans-context.

What changed? We still know nothing about the QT but "EVERYONE is CONVINCED of THIS" et cetera.

Wagon looked stupid when nobody was explaining the entire basis of the case.

SlumberPartyBois · Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:36 pm

In post 1043, Ythan wrote:
In post 960, Kawaii wrote:Well we wern't planning on outing the hydra QT JUST YET but well scumFate decided he'd out it first to try and get the jump on us so.

Why would you hide this?

because we were developing reads and wanted to be able to fish for reactions without it being public knowledge that we were working as a bloc.

Om of the Nom · Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:38 pm

The entire basis of the case is terrible though, even after explaining.

PEDIT: So how did you go with that then?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:40 pm

In post 1046, SlumberPartyBois wrote:
because we were developing reads and wanted to be able to fish for reactions without it being public knowledge that we were working as a bloc.

I can't see townies agreeing to do this... I bet there are a lot of scum in the QT. Om is being facetious (I think), but he might not be all that far from the truth. Maybe some townies will be swayed by the will of a majority, but that does sound a lot more than a scum plan than a townie plan.

One Direction · Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:42 pm

sorry i can't stand this any longer it's actually fucking making me sick

vote dgb