What do you think of it now? [/quote]In post 321, absta101 wrote:@Mala
Why would scum care less than town?Mala wrote:Instead you did nothing as I said gave off the illusion that you can care less about them.
You've just established that your second accusation is null.What is the town-motivation for making a filer post?
Like what?There could have been other things that you could have said, but chose to ignore.
What? He's leaning scum.Why are you so convinced he's scum. Why isn't there a possibility in your mind that he might actually be town?
Also, answer the question. You said "regardless of alignment". Why wouldn't you want scum-conman to support his own lynch?
It's a terrible reason for calling me scum, probably the worst i've ever seen. Scum make fake reasons for calling town "scum". That's what I think you're doing.6) How is it vote worthy?
How does me not being threatened by votes make me scum?
A recent game of mine I stopped thinking that vote hopping is a scummy thing.
---
1. Town should be more paranoid of votes honestly. Especially unexplained and not well reasoned votes. Scum don't really have to be worried about votes on them unless it's shown that more votes are going to put them in danger.
2. Unless scum are using filler posts to make them look like they are hunting. Town shouldn't be making filler posts at all. Which is why filler posts are more likely to come from scum rather than town.
3. What you addressed in your page 3 post could have been posted on during Page 2. You could have talked about NS's post #31 and his vote on Fitz or the two votes against you. Gorgon was making good posts which you didn't post thoughts regarding.
That's only a few things that could have been addressed rather than the post that had your unvote, but along with asking Slandaar an non-important question. (We have established that it was non-important because you don't remember why you asked it in the first place)
4. He's leaning scum to you, but you are willing to hammer him and you want a claim.
There's many reasons why players wouldn't want scum to support their own lynch. It makes it harder to actually find the other remaining scum. I'd be all for scum to support their own lynch when they are the last one alive, but not during Day 1 or even other Days without scum flips. It makes it so much easier to find connections with scum flips when they don't support their own lynch as opposed to days when they support it.
5. Yet I think you are wrong because if others were to ISO you they would also find that you haven't really been hunting for scum.
6. Why do I have to answer a question in which you already have the answer. The answer is within the quote that you are wanting me to answer.
----
@D3x:
There was some things that my predecessor did that I didn't approve of, but it didn't make him scummy. The vote for the no lynch was the worse thing that I didn't like. Mainly because I have never seen a no lynch happen on Day 1 on this site.
He was also very wishy-washy when it came to the topic of Kthx, but also Conman.
I thought of his vote and then unvote on Conman was something that scum wouldn't have done.
Post 239 was showing that he was trying to hunt, but he seemed lost on where to go which then triggered his No Lynch vote.
Taking all his posts into order he was leaning town for me rather than scum. Solid town? No, but I can't say that his play was Solid scum.
---
@Gorgon:
After reading my current posts do you still think I'm scummy? If you don't think I'm scummy why is your vote still on me?
Same question would apply to Saint, but he's V/LA, but he needs to answer this once he returns.