In post 199, ArcAngel9 wrote:and, I just wanted to know if there is any Day Vig kill. This is a big game. They come under good use if we have two major suspects in a day phase. Isn't a good thing to have ability to hit Mafia twice?
In the words of Michael Buffer, "Let's get ready to Rolefish!"
ArcAngel9 wrote: In post 205, The Mini-Librarian wrote: In post 193, Aj The Epic wrote:Parma and B&B have an argument that could justify their own votes, but I see three sheep and it isn't even time for me to go to bed yet. I'd like for Njoseph, Arc and Liberian to post any tells, just minor leanings and the sort, of those who have posted please. You are sheep, and must at least give something to contribute. Start there.
What the fuck are you talking about? Read my iso.
Lol, this is why i like mafia verymuch. you can have a serious talk with the most amusing reactions.
Aj The Epic thinks those votes are too quick. Mr AJ, Its just a vote not the lynch yet. so chill
It's an ugly vote on your part.
Mini_librarian, please explain to me how him RVS'ing is a bad thing. Realistically the only other thing going on was some minor reaction tests and major talk of policy lynching Roger. That's something I don't have an issue with someone skipping, per time.
Bird, his reaction is the same as I've come to expect from most people with the votes of sorts placed on him. This reaction, I chalk it up to the standard "explain your vote, please". And it is a legitimate concern. When Njoseph and Arc placed votes, please tell me you at least smell a rat. You're initial clear/reads realistically are very gutty. I, personally, have Njoseph and Arc as needing validation to any other reads besides Thez and you that has some slightly unique reasoning or that doesn't follow your own calls before I pressure the hell out of them the rest of the game.
Lastly, since I have been having a major issue with sheeps in some games recently, allow people to place their own argument. Too often, people vote by the "I agree" system and it ticks me off no matter who they're lynching on.
Personally, my gut instinct tells me Thezmon is not scum for any reasoning brought up previously. It's an ugly reason essentially based totally off of this site's meta and not taking into account different habitual tendencies of other sites. Like, for example, I'd never state whether someone is scum or town based on two or three posts. Anyone can make a couple of posts if this were the case and appear town. The few that you deem as scum are then instantly lynched. The calls on this site are a pride thing for you at the end of the game to say "Hey look at all these reads I got right", in my opinion. Views should change too fast for two or three posts to decide this. They can come off as such, as you have me coming off as town up to now. But, my direct confrontation to you would surely change your opinion, correct? What then? Will you be influenced by prior views of who I am defending, or influenced by views of your gut instinct?
Also, by trying to take such a strong town standing earlier, you will regardless draw sheep. This is going to mean that YOU have to be more mindful of those following you. Especially because when someone agrees with you more often than disagrees, you are lulled into tendency to feel a sense of comradery. This is only natural, but you'll be influenced by that in just the same way that someone who argues with you will naturally be seen as a foe. For the moment, you and Parma both appear town, which not only makes you a target, people will tie themselves in such ways to WK themselves off of your death. Be VERY careful with your reads, therefore. And, I suspect your read on Thezmon is wrong.
