Micro 102: Mainstream Mini-Mafia [END, CULT WIN]

Human Destroyer · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:16 pm

(I mean I'm not confused that you have a town read on him, I'm confused as to why)

Majiffy · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:18 pm

Early posting was indicative of town trying to determine the alignment of players and gather reads.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:20 pm

In post 98, JacobSavage wrote:Oh hai.

Couple of questions,
Majiffy: what is your relation to Thor?
<--Useless for purposes of scum/townhunting.

Who other than Siv do you think is scum?
Inquiring about someone's reads isn't really scum/townhunting.

The guy with one of the Hammer bros as an avatar: Why is Majiffy s likely partners if he is scum?
<--Probably the only question that's actually scum/townhunting.

I disagree.

Majiffy · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:22 pm

In post 98, JacobSavage wrote:Who other than Siv do you think is scum?
Inquiring about someone's reads isn't really scum/townhunting.

In post 477, Human Destroyer wrote:I disagree.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:24 pm

No asking for someone's reads is asking for their thoughts on the subject.

That's not scumhunting, that's asking for opinions.

There's a difference.

Thor665 · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:52 pm

In post 454, pirate mollie wrote:your deflection

Which deflection? I do it so much you need to zone me in.

In post 456, Human Destroyer wrote:Yeah I lost my train of thought with that post

It probably has something to do with my vote remaining on Thor while not expanding on his scumminess and instead looking at other lynches

Correct?

Ding-ding-ding!
What does he win?
He wins a lynching, Bob.
All righty then!

Human Destroyer · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:54 pm

That's the way I post, just because I vote someone while talking about someone else doesn't make me scum

Thor665 · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:57 pm

It does when your top scumspect asks you who he should help lynch and you embark on a conversation with him not involving him.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:58 pm

...because I'm totally going to be able to convince you to vote yourself.

Thor665 · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:59 pm

So instead your logic was you were going to honestly discuss your second top lynch option with your first?
Is that the story we're going with?

Human Destroyer · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:00 pm

Yes, I'm absolutely fine with doing that.

If people don't support the lynch of my top scumread, it makes sense to recruit them to lynch my second/third scumreads, does it not?

RachMarie · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:38 pm

Welcome Thor.

Yikes Jacob hold your tongue that would be a nightmare if they were both scum together, if that were so town should give up now.

I however, am going on the odds they are not both scum. Need to do some ISO, but I think Majiffy is town.

@ Thor I thought possibly that Melmond was scum, but I am getting more of a towny read from HD, so what am I missing?

Voidedmafia · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:08 pm

In post 479, Human Destroyer wrote:No asking for someone's reads is asking for their thoughts on the subject.

That's not scumhunting, that's asking for opinions.

There's a difference.

And then you follow up with questions relating to how they have said reads, etc.?

It's scumhunting, HD.

In post 483, Human Destroyer wrote:...because I'm totally going to be able to convince you to vote yourself.

Yknow, I thought that was supposed to be the time why you lay (or re-lay) out the case against your top read for everyone else?

In post 485, Human Destroyer wrote:
If people don't support the lynch of my top scumread, it makes sense to recruit them to lynch my second/third scumreads, does it not?

Did you even have a case on Thor/whoever he replaced?

Human Destroyer · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:10 pm

Yes

Siv had (almost) no content and bandwagoned like nuts

And considering Jacob never followed up, that statement is invalid.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm

In post 488, Human Destroyer wrote:Yes

Siv had (almost) no content and bandwagoned like nuts

Ah, okay.

And considering Jacob never followed up, that statement is invalid.

True enough. But do you see what I mean?

Human Destroyer · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:16 pm

Yes, I do.

Thor665 · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:48 pm

In post 486, RachMarie wrote:@ Thor I thought possibly that Melmond was scum, but I am getting more of a towny read from HD, so what am I missing?

Since I already described my case on him...I'll guess you're missing in reading comprehension?
What do you think of my case on him?

In post 485, Human Destroyer wrote:Yes, I'm absolutely fine with doing that.

If people don't support the lynch of my top scumread, it makes sense to recruit them to lynch my second/third scumreads, does it not?

And by 'people' you mean 'top scumspect'?

In post 488, Human Destroyer wrote:Siv had (almost) no content and bandwagoned like nuts

Can you show me an example of his scummy bandwagoning that he did like nuts?

Thor665 · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:49 pm

In post 491, Thor665 wrote:Can you show me an example of his scummy bandwagoning that he did like nuts?

Especially since I just looked.
He voted three people in three days - and those were the first three days of the games.
One of the votes was himself.
Sooooo, bandwagony.

Looking forward to this one being explained to me.

Majiffy · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:38 pm

In post 479, Human Destroyer wrote:No asking for someone's reads is asking for their thoughts on the subject.

That's not scumhunting, that's asking for opinions.

You have much to learn, young Padawan.

RachMarie · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:39 pm

I just ISOed both Melmond and HD and I do not see where he self voted Thor.

Voidedmafia · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:41 pm

In post 494, RachMarie wrote:I just ISOed both Melmond and HD and I do not see where he self voted Thor.

Siv, not Melmond...

RachMarie · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:46 pm

ohhh my bad...

um Thor you do realize you are calling your predecessor scummy ?

pirate mollie · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:49 pm

In post 480, Thor665 wrote:
In post 454, pirate mollie wrote:your deflection

Which deflection? I do it so much you need to zone me in.

#430 is a good start

but #437 was funnier

and then of course there was this post that I am responding to.

red flags everywhere

pirate mollie · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:50 pm

awsum xposts

Thor665 · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:16 pm

@Rach - why do you think Human is townish?
Also - justify your current vote pl0x.

In post 497, pirate mollie wrote:#430 is a good start

but #437 was funnier

and then of course there was this post that I am responding to.

red flags everywhere

Guess you got me dead to rights.

Describe what it is I'm dodging again for the slow kids in class?