Mini 1414: Mafia and Werewolves - Game Over

WT Snacks · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:13 pm

VOTE: Golden Mean

wagon wagon go go go

WT Snacks · Post Post #57 (isolation #1) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:44 am

In post 53, Revenus wrote:^ brilliant town post by hume

Seriously that's a lot of words trying to analyze a mostly RVS.

In post 53, Revenus wrote:^ brilliant town post by hume

Stop trying to find a town buddy, long =/= brilliant. What part of his post is brilliant? That part where he asks why someone made a random vote during RVS?

WT Snacks · Post Post #58 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:45 am

Dammit, first quote is supposed to be of Hume's novel.

WT Snacks · Post Post #59 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:56 am

On a more srs note:

Revenus is doing zero scumhunting, which is pretty funny coming from someone who claims so vocally to be town. Assuming that dayvig was fake I'm comfortable with where our vote is.

WT Snacks · Post Post #66 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:47 am

In post 7, Revenus wrote:
vote Xegarus

Clearly trying to derail the wagon on his scumbuddy gg

So Revenus, you're still voting your "random" vote. How come?

WT Snacks · Post Post #84 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:18 pm

In post 80, the director wrote:
RVS Review:

...

What exactly was the point of this post?

Don't you think others can read the thread and form their own conclusions? Or was this an attempt to provide information instead of analysis.

WT Snacks · Post Post #196 (isolation #6) » Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:19 pm

Can someone explain this Hiraki case to me? I've just caught up over the last few pages and Hiraki looked pretty town to me. The only post of his that I really dislike is this

In post 137, Hiraki wrote:I didn't confuse him with you.

Can't remember who I did though. Oh well.

WT Snacks · Post Post #197 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:22 pm

Other than that Hiraki looks town. Xegarus on the other hand, WTF is this shit?

In post 113, Xegarus wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Hiraki

No explanation at all, just immediately sheeping the previous vote which also had no explanation.

WT Snacks · Post Post #210 (isolation #8) » Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:25 am

In post 207, Navarre wrote:@Hiraki. Little to no content helps me stay alive at night and people are harder to read day 1 because of the many arguments that people may have. This seriously effects my reads and day 2 will help me provide clearer reads which i will out tomorrow. Get me? or is this really confusing? because it seems to be really confusing when i type it.

Can we kill this with fire please?

UNVOTE

VOTE: navarre

You appear to have a hard time keeping track of who you've voted. You unvoted Hiraki, after never having voted him. Not only do you not care who you're voting for, but you also don't care about scum hunting, you just want to coast your way to night.

In post 144, Navarre wrote:Evilpacman, you comment on everyone's ability to scumhunt yet you post no reads yourself and have not done any scumhunting yourself and to me this makes you lean scum.

Xegarus, We still need a reason for your sheeping vote.

UNVOTE: Hiraki
VOTE: Xegarus

Jason are you voting YOLO just because he doesn't understand points that have been made? Because to me YOLO seems more towny then a lot of other players in this game.

WT Snacks · Post Post #241 (isolation #9) » Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:27 am

In post 188, Revenus wrote:WTSnacks seems content with my wagon even as he sits on his RVS vote; oh wait, that's because the only thing he's commented on is me.

You can chalk this up to confusion between hydra heads; we're kinda new at this.

WT Snacks · Post Post #242 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:28 am

Thought we were already voting revenus, etc.

WT Snacks · Post Post #270 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:46 pm

Evilpacman, how come you're not voting the director?

WT Snacks · Post Post #272 (isolation #12) » Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:38 pm

This quote:

In post 232, evilpacman18 wrote:Any Revenus is doing a better job of looking like town.

Followed by 4-5 posts calling the director scum says to me that you think the director is scummier than revenus. Gauging whether or not the wagon is going anywhere reads like scum trying not to make waves.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: evilpacman

WT Snacks · Post Post #279 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:44 am

In post 273, Xegarus wrote:
Everything in my post 147 was to explain my vote. And I was talking about hiraki.
I said hiraki has not commented on my vote of him, i said that me not giving a reason would have ticked him off.
And he still hasn't said anything about my vote on him, This strikes me a really odd becuase he is on L-1.
I have been busy and still am, but i will try to post more from now on.

So your vote was a reaction test that failed. Why are you still voting him?

WT Snacks · Post Post #309 (isolation #14) » Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:52 pm

isoing hiraki to determine if he's ragetown or flailing scum

WT Snacks · Post Post #492 (isolation #15) » Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:24 pm

Hi, sorry.

Busy weekend for both of us it seems. Content soon.

WT Snacks · Post Post #605 (isolation #16) » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:32 pm

Okay, so I've been slacking on this game for the last IRL week or so. Getting caught up now and

what the literal fuck was that dragon shit about??!?

Anyways, reading hiraki's iso looking for pings

In post 60, Hiraki wrote:You do realize if you are still alive that you've got this whole mess of shit because you've been complaining about being daykilled rather than actually explaining everything.

Coaching?

In post 226, Hiraki wrote:Revenus. I had confidence. I want you to look at AJ's posts and consider where his accusations are coming from.

Moar coaching?

Still going through it, that's just what popped out. Re-reading revenus.

WT Snacks · Post Post #606 (isolation #17) » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:34 pm

In post 47, Hiraki wrote:Let's move on from Revenus and look more at Navarre, please.

This too, actually. "Let's move on" seems more like "gtfo my partner".

WT Snacks · Post Post #678 (isolation #18) » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:05 pm

Sorry for not posting for a while. Both heads have been super busy IRL.

However Josh your lurking is total bullshit. You've posted twice so you're clearly here and reading the post, you're just trying to coast your way through the day by trying to appear uncaring about the votes on you.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Josh Lyman

That's L-1. Maybe now we'll see if the director has the balls to hammer that he keeps claiming to have.