Mini 1414: Mafia and Werewolves - Game Over

Xegarus · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:19 pm

VOTE: Director
Doesn't sound good to me.

Xegarus · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:23 am

So Rev, who do you think is most likely to be 'faking' it?

In post 28, Navarre wrote:VOTE: WT snacks

Keep the votes coming people!

Got nothing to say about what is going on?

Xegarus · Post Post #49 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:44 am

In post 32, Josh Lyman wrote:
Dayvig: Revenus

I've had about enough. It's a shame to
waste
it this early, though.

Why do it if it is a waste?

Xegarus · Post Post #51 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:08 am

In post 50, Hume wrote:Why not?

Cause :
It was a RVS vote.
A RVS wagon was forming.
He put no reason but 'it sounds good' forward.

Xegarus · Post Post #62 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:59 am

In post 60, Hiraki wrote:He's saying that it's a waste because he doesn't care if it's town or scum. Either way this is a good kill.

If it was a good kill, therefore by definition it would not be a waste.

Xegarus · Post Post #113 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:58 pm

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Hiraki

Xegarus · Post Post #115 (isolation #6) » Fri Jan 25, 2013 12:07 am

In post 114, Revenus wrote:Reasons why, now.

Later

Xegarus · Post Post #147 (isolation #7) » Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:06 pm

In post 144, Navarre wrote:

Xegarus, We still need a reason for your sheeping vote.

UNVOTE: Hiraki
VOTE: Xegarus

In post 139, evilpacman18 wrote:one of those 'votes create pressure' people.

He hasn't commented on the vote at all, so don't exactly know what he's doing.
I'm pretty sure voting someone without posting a reason would tick said person off, atleast enough to say something about.

Xegarus · Post Post #256 (isolation #8) » Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:20 am

Sorry, been a little busy.
Will post more starting tomorrow.

Xegarus · Post Post #273 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:18 am

In post 252, Revenus wrote:
Ok, onto Xegarus

Post #6: RVS
Post #29: Asks me who I think is most likely to be "faking" that I'm scum on my wagon (null), Asks Navarre why he isn't commenting on anyone (null/town)
Post #49: Questions Lyman on his usage of language (null)
Post #51: Oh, his RVS vote was actually serious (null/scum)
Post #62: Argument over semantics (null)
Post #113: Vote on Hiraki out of nowhere (scummy)
Post #115: Asked for reasons on Hiraki vote, tells us he'll give them "later" (scummy, because he still hasn't given any; looks like he was hoping other people would construct an argument for him right now IMO)
Post #147: Talks about Navarre not commenting on a vote (even though he's done the same thing????) and that voting without a reason would tick someone off (even though he's doing the same thing????)

Ok nevermind, this dude is far scummier

Vote:Xegarus

Everything in my post 147 was to explain my vote. And I was talking about hiraki.
I said hiraki has not commented on my vote of him, i said that me not giving a reason would have ticked him off.
And he still hasn't said anything about my vote on him, This strikes me a really odd becuase he is on L-1.
I have been busy and still am, but i will try to post more from now on.

Xegarus · Post Post #281 (isolation #10) » Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:40 am

In post 279, WT Snacks wrote:
In post 273, Xegarus wrote:
Everything in my post 147 was to explain my vote. And I was talking about hiraki.
I said hiraki has not commented on my vote of him, i said that me not giving a reason would have ticked him off.
And he still hasn't said anything about my vote on him, This strikes me a really odd becuase he is on L-1.
I have been busy and still am, but i will try to post more from now on.

So your vote was a reaction test that failed. Why are you still voting him?

He didn't seem to mind my vote, i didn't see the need to take it off.