In post 199, Vifam wrote:DeasVail seems like one of those players who are always fake no matter what
Sometimes I'm not.
I admit that I feel I'm kind of forcing it here, but when I actually have a proper scumread I'll get back to you.
In post 199, Vifam wrote:DeasVail seems like one of those players who are always fake no matter what
In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Not liking peta (not engaged in the game, coasting through)
In post 204, petapan wrote:vifam delivering one liners isn't relevant to his alignment that's just how he posts also he's p clearly posting content so ur dum imho
In post 204, petapan wrote:vifam delivering one liners isn't relevant to his alignment that's just how he posts
In post 207, Vifam wrote:Peta always posts like that and you are really are dumb if you think that takes away from his statement
In post 147, camn wrote:Cerulean- Encouraging us out of the RVS. Randomly naming names is the worst kind of first page. But- no longer relevant.
And- why not just post as the hydra? This talk about your internal discussion with the other head.... it confuses me.
DAYNE- please tell me- do you have a post restriction? Or are you doing this on purpose?
In post 150, TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:In post 142, Shadoweh wrote:Commenting that SAD and Cerulean are townie is a waste of time here, more talk about people that can actually be scum.
hang on, what? when is it ever a waste of time to comment on townreads?
In post 149, Nostredeus wrote:b) someone asks for RP to be stopped and has frankly legit reasons for asking only to be voted for, I'm not sure how that's supposed to be a town play, although again I'm happy to hear why it is, c) it's the first post of page 5 and part of the response is "Benmage needs moar useful content", the logical extension is that anyone with less useful content/more misleading content should be voted ahead of Benmage; that's not what Shadoweh is doing. Basically I didn't buy post 100 at all, and I don't have any idea why it's supposedly a response to Cerulean's stuff.
In post 162, ChannelDelibird wrote:Nost struck me as pretty genuine in that exchange. Come vote SafetyDance instead, McStab.
In post 164, McStab wrote:But you managed to get swayed by one small, two or three sentence post that doesn't even address that issue solely?
In post 176, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:That flat shawty with them big eyes probably ain't no cop.
In post 186, DeasVail wrote:PEdit: I'll expand on townreads if people feel that it would help with their read on the player in question. Or even if someone just really feels that my explanation for a townread would be the key to determining my alignment. I realise that I haven't said who I townread yet though.
In post 189, petapan wrote:how is him prematurely jumping to conclusions reflective of his alignment rather than simply being bad play
In post 195, DeasVail wrote:
Also, not particularly fond of much that's been brought up yet, although I might be later. I don't know.
In post 200, DeasVail wrote:I admit that I feel I'm kind of forcing it here, but when I actually have a proper scumread I'll get back to you.
In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:3rd party vibes from Nost's 103 (His suggestion for massclaim came of a bit desperate. Sounds like a lyncher or a SK that needs to kill specific people.
In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:@Benmage: Reason for voting Plessie?
In post 210, Shadoweh wrote:Nost's answer to the question about Tazaro is full of derp. Also I think he took me seriously when I said Benmage is easy to quicklynch? He sounds legit to me. Nost, who do you think had 'more misleading' content then Benmage at the point where I voted him?
Re: Burden of Proficiency: I wasn't asking for Benmage to vig one of the scum in the middle of Day 1 again. I was pointing out i didn't think he was being as involved as he usually is. More like the Burden of Be Yourself. He feels like he's trawling right now (not to be mistaken with trolling).
In post 203, petapan wrote:In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Not liking peta (not engaged in the game, coasting through)
i just have no idea what i'm doing
In post 203, petapan wrote:In post 197, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Not liking peta (not engaged in the game, coasting through)
i just have no idea what i'm doing
shadoweh wrote:For contrieved reasoning like 'calling for mass nameclaim must mean a third party' and avoiding commenting on current vote (never commenting on it really. 'it felt funny'.) along with asking why absta isn't voting for someone Mini himself isn't convinced is scum? Mostly I don't like your face double spacing that makes it look like your post is alot bigger then it is, when you only express one solid read in the entire thing. Sounds like lurking.
In post 221, Vifam wrote:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... start=7325
That's my most recent town but it's gonna take a while finding the most recent scum