Open 475, Twin Trap GAME OVER

[unseencamo]

For now. He came off more clueless than anything at first I suppose.
UNVOTE:

[Lincolm]

@Camo :
...don't know what you mean...

What I see, you wait other people questioning and answering. Describe your scum-hunting.

[ArcAngel9]

Unvote

I like that ArcAngel is actually being active in a game for once, I hope she can keep it up(no offence).

Thinking about switching my voting to camo for his fencesitting.

Lol, no offense taken. Thats how i play.
thanks

[ArcAngel9]

Anybody have the current Vote tally?

[Venrob]

Official Vote Count 1.4

VC 1.4

Players needed to lynch: 5

Human Destroyer

- 1 - Disturbed_One (L-4)

Lincolm

- 1 - MonkeyMan576 (L-4)

unseencamo

- 2 - Human Destroyer, ArcAngel9 (L-3)

Players not voting: Lincolm, Hiraki, Tazaro, unseencamo uctriton00

Day 1 deadline:

(expired on 2013-02-02 10:58:00)

Note: Reason for me not counting bolded votes is that my DS does not show bold, but does show vote tags.

[Human Destroyer]

Seems you agitated with someone in L-2 with weak case. May explain why it seems orchestrated? For me it just same like the other random vote.

I always have problems with RVS wagons. Especially ones that aren't explicitly stated to be wagons.

Unseen, could you explain exactly what you learned from that "reaction test" of yours?

[Tazaro]

I don't know.

[Hiraki]

Right, onto that post now.

Ugh, screw votetags. Why is that seriously a rule.

@ Lincoln
Admitting to lurking does not justify it or make it ok.

I find it's working pretty well in this sense.

Lincolm is a newbie. Therefore, stop trying to:
A) Teach him how to play well by example
B) Relay regular tells with him.

He doesn't follow the normal meta of Mafiascum yet.

The suspicious part being that you would just allow yourself to lurk, doesn't make sense as a townie. And you "being here" is a little something called active lurking.
VOTE: Lincolm

VOTE: unseencamo

Reeks of opportunism. VOTE: Human Destroyer

Have you ever seen Empking play?

I will side with Human Destroyer in this duel

VOTE: unseencamo

I don't really like this response

but I'll take the early support when needed

Reason please.

No offense but the reasoning is pretty clear.

It is really sadden.

Serious question here, considering you used "mad" as your first response to me.

Is English your first language?

I trust H.D. for now. Scum doesn't just regularly make a serious vote without explanation.

Yeah remember the whole "I'll take the support when needed" post waaaaaay back in my postings?

Yeah, not too sure if you're on our side bud.

Active lurking = posting nothing beneficial.

Because this is seriously an applicable tell on the beginning of Page 3.

Then again you're just a newbie acting tough, so I'm not surprised.

Meh.

UNVOTE:

Maybe H.D. shouldn't have my trust yet.

When did you try out this new gamestyle? It's a tad bit annoying, really.

but Unseem reaction was unusual...

You. I like you.

At any case, his reaction is unusual because he's a noobs and he doesn't know how to push the right buttons at the right time yet.

Right now, he's just going after anyone who looks at him with a bad glance.

Ok, but the fact that he had to state his lurking reasons seems to me that he is overconcerned about how people see him.

Well at least you've improved a little. You still have to account that he's a newbie and doing things in advance is like priority number one.

Either that or you're just a newbie VI.

Its common that sometimes you don't have anything to post than just read and read and read.

While I agree with you on the point that he's not actively lurking (seriously guys, this is page 3. whoever is accusing active lurking should be shot on sight), you do have to post sometimes in a game. This logic is a bit faulty.

Lurking mostly means intentionally avoiding a topic or one's discussion, more as in being afraid to talk

The problem is that you can easily give a reason on not talking while being afraid to talk at the same time. No one is going to jump out and say "I'm not talking because ArcAngel9's accusations scare me."

Instead, they'll just make up a normal excuse. The whole goal is to either ignore all excuses or be able to see between the ones that are fake and real.

In addition, if you need to use the above as a reason to lynch/vote someone, you're probably not going after scum.

I agree with 62 and 63. I believe that Human Destroyer is town but he's not the towniest of people, if that makes sense.

Fencesitting? At least I am contributing.

OMGUS? At least I'm contributing!

What the hell do these two have to with each other.

Note: Reason for me not counting bolded votes is that my DS does not show bold, but does show vote tags.

[Lincolm]

I don't know.

This post address to?

Lincolm is a newbie.

Why you think I'm newbie?

Have you ever seen Empking play?

I have. Just once (but I replaced), he as scum. Very opportunistic guy. Have heard Mollie and Majiffy? Wooo... I like them. (By the way, I watch your game with Jason)

No offense but the reasoning is pretty clear.

It's better ask it. Maybe he saw something I didn't see.

Is English your first language?

No. Wrong word I use I assume? Lol

Then again you're just a newbie acting tough, so I'm not surprised.

Why you don't think he is newbie?

At any case, his reaction is unusual because he's a noobs and he doesn't know how to push the right buttons at the right time yet.

I bet "he" in here is unseencamo? Then why you vote him?

I believe that Human Destroyer is town but he's not the towniest of people, if that makes sense.

So, who is the towniest for you? Do not say that is yourself.

[Disturbed_One]

Independently, no and no, BUT if combined with an L-2 or L-1 vote, I'd say very much yes.

So you see unseencamo's reasoning as a poor excuse to jump the wagon? I think I get where you're coming from, though I still maintain that that's not necessarily alignment indicative.

For now, I'm satisfied with your answers to my questions.

VOTE: Unvote:

@ Hiraki:

I don't know who Empking is. Should I?

[Disturbed_One]

Sorry if I screwed up the tags in my last post, these vote tags are highly unfamiliar territory for me.

[Tazaro]

@Lincolm: I don't know ... who to vote for right now.

[Tazaro]

^ O.K., that should be "whom."

[Lincolm]

Clearly, he doesn't believe that he is attacking Lincolm over nothing

Do you see like that? If yes, explain his attack.

I like you to answer this.

[Hiraki]

Why you think I'm newbie?

Join date in addition to early game reactions.

No. Wrong word I use I assume? Lol

Wrong tense and words. Nbd though.

Why you don't think he is newbie?

I do? This is why the above does frighten me.

I bet "he" in here is unseencamo? Then why you vote him?

Because it furthers my read that he's a newbie and does these actions as scum.

So, who is the towniest for you? Do not say that is yourself.

You. But pointless question, really.

@Disturbed: Just realizing that not fully explaining your reads is a viable tactic for certain people.

[Lincolm]

I do? This is why the above does frighten me.

Oh okay. I just got this words, "Then again you're just a newbie acting tough, so I'm not surprised.", like "unseencamo is acting as newbie". Well, that act meaning he acts as scum. Okay.

You. But pointless question, really.

Because I like to know the reason also (even it is pointless, somehow those reasons...). So, can you tell me?

[Hiraki]

I answered it?

[Lincolm]

Sorry, I already try to search it in more than 10 minutes, and I don't find it.

What I find in your post about me :

I find it's working pretty well in this sense.

Lincolm is a newbie. Therefore, stop trying to:
A) Teach him how to play well by example
B) Relay regular tells with him.

He doesn't follow the normal meta of Mafiascum yet.

Serious question here, considering you used "mad" as your first response to me.

Is English your first language?

I ever once get townread because of the second. That's why I don't like to tell my language because I feel it's unfair. I don't know if you did the same also.

[Disturbed_One]

@ Hiraki:

I don't quite get your point, if you're looking for a response on my part I'd like you to elaborate.

@ Lincolm:

I don't quite get what you want from me here. You want me to explain unseencamo's attack? Or do you mean you want me to elaborate on my stance on unseencamo in general?

If the former, I think it would be wise for you to just ask unseencamo about his attack. Unless this is some strange test of my comprehension.

If the latter, what exactly do you need me to elaborate on?

[Venrob]

Sorry if I screwed up the tags in my last post, these vote tags are highly unfamiliar territory for me.

Code: Select all

[vote]NAME[/vote]  and  [unvote]NAME[/unvote]

VOTE: NAME and UNVOTE: NAME

Ugh, screw votetags. Why is that seriously a rule.

Note: Reason for me not counting bolded votes is that my DS does not show bold, but does show vote tags.

Answered your own question. Most of the time i post from my DS and i just scroll super fast to look for votes to update the count... And it doesnt show bold. So i need you to use vote tags.

EDIT:

NEWS

Deadline reduced by 5 days
Deadline added to all vote counts
All vote counts made look better
From now on I will make TOP votecounts (Top Of Page)

Day 1 deadline:

(expired on 2013-02-02 10:58:00)

[ArcAngel9]

there isn't much happened since yesterday.. are planning on moving the day?

[Disturbed_One]

Hey MonkeyMan, you're still voting Lincolm. Does that you mean you still find Lincolm suspicious? If so, what exactly about Lincolm is it that you still find suspicious?

[Hiraki]

Who's idea was it to reduce days? Please don't tell me it was yours Venrob.

Please.

[Human Destroyer]

I'm still here, just waiting on unseen's response >.>

@Mod: Shouldn't uct be replaced or something?

[Hiraki]

Hold the fucking phone.

Wait a minute.

4 Pages in 4 Days is a STALLING GAME?

REALLY?

WITH TWO REPLACEMENTS?