In post 789, Whiskers wrote:Ok when you remove all the quotes in a chain, it takes them out of context, which allows you to misrep and twist words. It's ok to do when the quotechain is no longer relevant (because the argument has moved into a new topid) but you've done it to
every one
. Stahp.
No. Unlike you, I don't like giant walls upon walls upon walls of quotes upon quotes upon quotes. Not only is it awful to look at, it makes it so that no one wants to actually read it.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:You asked what information you were withholding. NOT what information you were withholding that "was your concern at the moment".
Scum motivation in changing the question after it's answered.
Yes, I'm pretty fucking adorable.
Scum motivation in avoiding a real answer to a real accusation.
1) If it isn't my concern at the moment, then why would I hold it to withhold it to begin with? Maybe you should read and think instead of conf. biasing everything I say.
2) What do you expect me to say? Oh, you're such the better guy for posting associative tells without flips? You're such a marvelous scumhunter?
Retard.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:
I pursue the line of thought because
Aldus's post and attacks are not invalid.
I wish to show you and the rest of the Village that.
I didn't say I thought you were scum.
But there's a very real chance that you
are
scum,
and I'm pointing it out to you. Call it scum coaching, if you will.
Like I said, the point wasn't to use associative tells, ("Majiffy is scum if Rob is scum,")
the point was that you're behaving like bussing scum, ("Majiffy is making a highly visible push but without any weight.")
I didn't propose to get a flip. I assume there will be
nightkills and lynches
between now and the end of the game-- those
will provide all the flips we need.
1) Except you've been conceding a lot of points, and I reckon by the time we're done, you'll have conceded the rest. So they really aren't.
2) Who's coaching whom? Aldu coaching me? Don't be silly.
3) It's kind of a necessity to say that you're using associative tells if you're accusing me of bussing.
4) Right so you're expecting the scum team to kill me so that I flip scum. Or something like that. Maybe I kill my teamate(s). I haven't got a damned clue. Because you already said you aren't trying to lynch me, so that takes lynches out of the equation.
No, actually, I was being entirely serious. That's all you're doing with your recent posting.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:
Aldsukkel's post about you is not baseless and you seem to want to lynch him for it. In fact iirc there were
three
times in your response to that post, that I could have tagged your argument for OMGUS. Instead I only did it for one and qualified the other two.
Anyway, no scumpoints for responding sarcastically since it wasn't an attack with anything solid to defend against.
Actually my argument about Aldu's post started before I voted him. I voted him because I didn't like the ProHawk wagon and there was no viable alternative. But you can retroactively call it OMGUS, I guess, fits with your poisoning the well tactic.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:Remember how pissed you were when he said "where's the scum motivation"? Even Rob13 used this and when you finally
did
provide motivation you said, "You're the hardest townie to get to do anything!"
Catchphrase!
If I remember right, your argument was that it's like saying "What's the scum motivation to scum slip?"
Funny thing, that. I didn't ask that about anything you considered a scum slip. So now you're the one who is altering the original question... didn't you call that scummy earlier in this post?
So you decided I was scummy whilst you were already making a case against me. Yeah, that makes sense.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:
Quote deleted, just more sarcasm here-- basically you saying that you didn't want him lynched, despite saying so several times and voting him. And as such, of course you didn't make a case. You were too tied up with Thor in an attack that eventually lead us to... not lynch him today regardless.
Is it my fault no one else seems to want to lynch obvscum Thor?
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:My Point: You made weak-ass pushes on Rob. You eventually even voted for Rob.
You said that you'd make a case on Rob once he became a better lynch than ProHawk. Since then, you unvoted ProHawk and voted Rob ((evidence that you think that's the case)). No case.
My Point: What gives?
Unvoted HD and voted Rob, actually.
You're trying to put things together that don't actually exist. Come back to reality.
In post 789, Whiskers wrote:Sooo... Consistency? Why not vote someone you
did
think was scum? Thor, maybe?
Because no one else wants to lynch him for whatever ridiculous reason(s).
More in the next post.
L-1 Alduskkel: (6) Human Destroyer, ProHawk, Tajun, uctriton00, Majiffy, auspicious
