Khan's Wacky Xylbot Mafia (Mini 1418) - Game Over

[Zang]

Sorry, I forgot that I joined this game.

I'm not going to vote for Reck unless he explains why he needs to die.

[shos]

wtf guys 3 pages and I never even saw this start!?!

lemme read

[shos]

Miller?

rolefishing aye?

!vote [Kthxbye]

kthxbai

[Voidedmafia]

And you don't have a problem with Reck claiming what seems to be a negative-utility role and acting like he needs to be lynched?

[Katsuki]

!vote: [Kthxbye]

Why are you not voting Reck?

Why single out Shmugen?

Because I've played with him before.

[Kthxbye]

Miller?

My role is definitely pretty rare, yep.

This isn't how you'd want to handle a negative role at all. So are you scum or what.

inb4 he drew VT and just wants out.

!vote: [Kthxbye]

Why are you not voting Reck?

Why single out Shmugen?

--

Reck, if your role is so anti-town that you must die (which I doubt, btw) why don't you just claim it?

Sorry, I forgot that I joined this game.

I'm not going to vote for Reck unless he explains why he needs to die.

Miller?

rolefishing aye?

!vote [Kthxbye]

kthxbai

So shos, why did you single me out when there are 4 other posts that one could call Role Fishing (light or otherwise)? Also, under the current situation, how exactly do you call any of them Role Fishing? If you can explain that, also explain why you would see this "Role Fishing" more likely scum motivated?

[MrObvious]

If you can explain that, also explain why you would see this "Role Fishing" more likely scum motivated?

I know your question was addressed to shos, so I'll leave plenty of room for his response, but you've been ascummulating points already in this very short game, your rolefish was but one of

several

factors leading to my vote.

[Shmugen]

Kinda harsh, Katsu.

[The Mini-Librarian]

If you can explain that, also explain why you would see this "Role Fishing" more likely scum motivated?

I know your question was addressed to shos, so I'll leave plenty of room for his response, but you've been ascummulating points already in this very short game, your rolefish was but one of

several

factors leading to my vote.

Like to share these several factors?

[Katsuki]

Kinda harsh, Katsu.

<3

Granted I wasn't suppose to be voting reck either so~

[Voidedmafia]

you weren't, huh? He your partner?

!Vote Katsuki

[Leafsnail]

So shos, why did you single me out when there are 4 other posts that one could call Role Fishing (light or otherwise)? Also, under the current situation, how exactly do you call any of them Role Fishing? If you can explain that, also explain why you would see this "Role Fishing" more likely scum motivated?

!vote: Kthxbye

poor response. Rather than shrug off the vote like most people would you've gone for a sortof passive-aggressive counterattack. This strikes me more as a desire to score points against shos than to identify his alignment.

[MrObvious]

Like to share these several factors?

Sheeping 2x
Role fishing
Inferred inifference to alignment of desied lynch target

[MrObvious]

Crap!

EBWOP: Inferred indifference to alignment of desired lynch target

[Zang]

rolefishing aye?

What is your opinion on Reck's claim?

Sheeping 2x
Role fishing
Inferred inifference to alignment of desied lynch target

Is there a reason why you did not include these reasons with your original vote or in the previous post when you said that you had multiple reasons?

[Kthxbye]

So shos, why did you single me out when there are 4 other posts that one could call Role Fishing (light or otherwise)? Also, under the current situation, how exactly do you call any of them Role Fishing? If you can explain that, also explain why you would see this "Role Fishing" more likely scum motivated?

!vote: Kthxbye

poor response. Rather than shrug off the vote like most people would you've gone for a sort of passive-aggressive counterattack. This strikes me more as a desire to score points against shos than to identify his alignment.

So instead of calling out that shos ignored other rolefishing, I was supposed to ignore it and not asked for motives behind it? How is asking for reason and clarification statements of shos anti-town? (oops, prolly should be ignoring this vote from you and...uh...not asked you to explain and....uh....not posted I guess, eh?....ah well).
--------------------
@Obvious: Let me clear the Inferred part for you. I am voting Reck and actually don't care what his alignment is. He says he's anti-town, I don't see how that's a beneficial statement from someone beneficial to town. scum/miller/etc, death becomes him to clear the weeds. So you're list is now:

Sheeping 2x
Role fishing
Indifference to alignment of player who desires lynch
(I corrected this statement to more accurately show what's happening).

[Luckyjt]

woah Im confused already with people wanting to kill themselves,however kthxbye has me leaning to vote them. Why? Because I dont like how he also wanted people to kill him after seeing hesitance with people afraid of voting rec. I dont know I saw it scummy. ANyways will reread tomorrow long day today for me.

[Leafsnail]

So instead of calling out that shos ignored other rolefishing, I was supposed to ignore it and not asked for motives behind it? How is asking for reason and clarification statements of shos anti-town? (oops, prolly should be ignoring this vote from you and...uh...not asked you to explain and....uh....not posted I guess, eh?....ah well).

Whether or not other people were doing it is irrelevant to the validity of the accusation. You could've maybe brought it up if it was bothering you so much (it shouldn't have, shos' vote was probably close to a randomvote) but it doesn't work as a response to the accusation by itself.

"Asking for reason and clarification" is ok, but it's not the thing you did.

@Obvious: Let me clear the Inferred part for you. I am voting Reck and actually don't care what his alignment is. He says he's anti-town, I don't see how that's a beneficial statement from someone beneficial to town. scum/miller/etc, death becomes him to clear the weeds.

Jesters do exist in Xylbot setups, and they're only Uncommon. So you should care about his alignment.

[MrObvious]

Is there a reason why you did not include these reasons with your original vote or in the previous post when you said that you had multiple reasons?

Yes, that's how I roll. The first instance is the type of vote that can create reactions and discussion. The second, I didn't want to step all over the question K had for shos, but I wanted to let know K know that I had more than one reason for my voting him.

---

So you're list is now:

Sheeping 2x
Role fishing
Indifference to alignment of player who desires lynch
(I corrected this statement to more accurately show what's happening).

Fair enough. It's still early in the game. Someone scummier than you will most likely step forward soon, I'm just working with what I have at this moment.

[The Mini-Librarian]

you weren't, huh? He your partner?

!Vote Katsuki

Is this another random vote?

--

!vote: zang

Don't like 64

Useless questions.

[Voidedmafia]

Whether or not other people were doing it is irrelevant to the validity of the accusation. You could've maybe brought it up if it was bothering you so much (it shouldn't have, shos' vote was probably close to a randomvote) but it doesn't work as a response to the accusation by itself.

Perhaps, but people don't like being singled out if others do it, too.

Even so, I don't really feel like I agree with what you're saying here. Regardless of what Shos accused kthnx of, if at least 3-4 other people did it as well yet Shos only accuses kthnx without much...substantial reasoning (for lack of a better word), I don't see why kthnx shouldn't point out that others are. Plus, given the levity of the accusation shos did place, kthnx calling him out on this isn't a weak response at all.

woah Im confused already with people wanting to kill themselves,however kthxbye has me leaning to vote them. Why? Because I dont like how he also wanted people to kill him after seeing hesitance with people afraid of voting rec. I dont know I saw it scummy. ANyways will reread tomorrow long day today for me.

...What?

Is this another random vote?

Possibly. Possibly not. I have half a hankering to vote Leafsnail now, though.

Useless questions.

Explain how asking Shos to comment on what kthnx was talking about is a useless question, as Shos hasn't actually commented on Reck's actions, just kthnx's reaction to it.

Explan how asking why reasons for votes weren't placed with the vote itself (or reference explicitly/implicitly) is useless.

Got a hankerng to vote you, too, ML.

[Katsuki]

you weren't, huh? He your partner?

!Vote Katsuki

Oh shit how could I have ever slipped like that!

[shos]

As leaf said, this was a haldrandom thingie; your fishing was probably the first that my eye caught, dunno - but anyway - that response was indeed quite dodge-y. This is mafia, the chances where someone says 'lynch me' and that is the right thing to do are really slim; half the quotes you gave are stuff I see no rolefishing in at all.

bleh, I hate typing at morning.

[Voidedmafia]

...You really don't see the rolefishing in Shmugen's and TML's? Really?

[Katsuki]