Huntress wrote:We've already been over this. The only thing I forgot to mention was that in post 124 I said I would be saying more about Wisdom and Kmd in a separate post (post 201) so that's where my reads on them were.
Alright, well that doesn't change the fact that your posts 83 and 124 contained IIoA.
Huntress wrote:Nope. The points I voted him for refer to comments he made on later posts by Kmd.
That is completely false.
Post 32-
-Wisdom accuses Kmd of being scum for ruining the potential of my 'joke' in his
-Wisdom accuses Kmd for the last paragraph of his
-Wisdom accuses Kmd for asking about my RVS vote in his
Posts he attacks; 4 and 13
Post 115-
-Wisdom continues arguing with Kmd over his
-Wisdom continues arguing with Kmd over his 'plan' from
Posts he attacks; 4 and 13
We both voted Wisdom for attacking posts 4 and 13. Your ignorance of this obvious detail is almost as bothersome as the detail itself. How could you possible argue against this?
Huntress wrote:I'm still waiting for replies from Lincolm but I'm ready and willing to vote Cheery now.
Vote: Cheery Dog
What prompted you to vote at this time specifically?