In post 691, Psyche wrote:Bitch, plz. (I'm so sorry for calling you that; it's not serious; just go with the roleplay; it'll be fun)
Let me 'pretty much summarize the basics of this case' as you seem to have a problem understanding it. I just made a wallpost - a fucking wallpost - laying out a case against you. And you have the nerve to say that there's barely anything around? Let me make this crystal clear.
I don't give a damn how crappy your ideas are. I've played a lot of games with very many very terrible very stupid players with very many very terrible very stupid ideas. I cannot even begin to relate to you just how frustrating these experiences have been, but I am inured. I am quite comfortable with the fact that townies can be terrible. But you aren't a townie. You are opportunistic, disingenuous "insta-frustrated" (quote tags for the 'yeah, right' effect) scum.
The fact that your reasons for voting slandaar are terrible aren't why I'm voting for you. Lots of terrible votes have happened, even in this game. I'm voting for you because you are scummy.
In post 691, Psyche wrote:You jumped onto the Slandaar wagon for dubious reasons. It was a huge jump; you'd defended him just a couple posts beforehand. But there was a tide, and you saw a chance. Opportunism, not crap, is what attracts me to you. Who is attracted to crap? That's not evolutionarily adaptive at all. >.>
In post 691, Psyche wrote:And when confronted about this opportunism, your response has been sooo weak. It literally doesn't make sense. The principles of rationality are violated thoroughly. Why? Because you're looking for a way out but there isn't one. You can only avoid the gravity of the case by 1) avoiding the case with vague whatevertheheck674was 2) recharacterizing it to make it less threatening (post 679), and 3) AtE the hell out of everyone.
And now your AtE has been uncovered as fiction. A lie. The lie, itself, is another scumslip. You're producing bullshit to cover up bullshit.
In post 671, Psyche wrote:No, this still sucks. When a player does something you find suspicious, you always examine his supposed reason for doing it. Especially for proposing a massclaim. Because his supposed reasons for doing it are the ONLY way you can differentiate between town seriously thinking something is a good idea and scum trying to pull a fast one.
If you don't examine the justification, you are deliberately skipping a critical step in the whole scumhunting process. It doesn't make any sense.
What you're saying is also dubious. You are definitely voting Slandaar for theoretical reasons - because you think massclaiming is a bad idea, rather than because Slandaar has done something suspicious.
In post 671, Psyche wrote:all you say about Slandaar in this post is that his theoretical argument is no good and announce that you want him dead.
In post 671, Psyche wrote:Town suffering from a behavior =/= behavior being scummy.
That's the distinction between antitown and scummy. I'm sure you aren't ignorant of it. You are playing stupid and now backtracking from a terrible but opportunistic bandwagon.
In post 715, Psyche wrote:
Let me do the summarization thing again, and then add a few more ideas. Should I do a bulleted list? I will do a bulleted list. Bitches love bulletted lists. HOW THE HECK DO I SPELL BULLETTED?
- Opportunism (as evinced by your scantily thought out reasons for wagoning Slandaar, specifically the way they concern play quality rather than play scumminess and explicitly refuse to consider presented justifications for play which is just plain irrational)
- Crappy Response to Censure (Let's be specific!)
General Theme: "You're looking for a way out but there isn't one." (tm)
1) avoiding the case with vague whatevertheheck674was
2) recharacterizing it to make it less threatening (post 679), and
3) AtE the hell out of everyone. BONUS: With lies! (PS: I'm fine with AtE, but this is more about contributing to the general theme above. Fight
the theme, not the AtE accusation!)
4) Completely failing to properly explain what actually sensical thoughts why you think/thought voting for Slandaar was reasonable from a townie perspective
- BONUS: With lies!
In post 758, Slandaar wrote:I did see that post
What could possibly be using your vote well if not to vote for scum?
Let me do the summarization thing again, and then add a few more ideas. Should I do a bulleted list? I will do a bulleted list. Bitches love bulletted lists. HOW THE HECK DO I SPELL BULLETTED?
- Opportunism (as evinced by your scantily thought out reasons for wagoning Slandaar, specifically the way they concern play quality rather than play scumminess and explicitly refuse to consider presented justifications for play which is just plain irrational)
- Crappy Response to Censure (Let's be specific!)
General Theme: "You're looking for a way out but there isn't one." (tm)
1) avoiding the case with vague whatevertheheck674was
2) recharacterizing it to make it less threatening (post 679), and
3) AtE the hell out of everyone. BONUS: With lies! (PS: I'm fine with AtE, but this is more about contributing to the general theme above. Fight
the theme, not the AtE accusation!)
4) Completely failing to properly explain what actually sensical thoughts why you think/thought voting for Slandaar was reasonable from a townie perspective
- BONUS: With lies!
(as evinced by your scantily thought out reasons for wagoning Slandaar, specifically the way they concern play quality rather than play scumminess and explicitly refuse to consider presented justifications for play which is just plain irrational)
In post 674, goodmorning wrote:
I also don't usually go back and check up on my opinions of people or my reasons for voting them.
In post 531, goodmorning wrote:DRK is probably one of my better Townreads ATM and Slandaar's argument on the massclaim is indeed bullshit (as I mentioned before).
What shall I do now? What shall I do?
I shall jump all over this wagon.
Vote: Slandaar
In post 674, goodmorning wrote:In post 668, Slandaar wrote:In post 666, goodmorning wrote:Proposing massclaim is not null at this time because there is a clear deficit to Town in it.
There is a clear deficit to town in quickhammering.
What differentiates the two?
If kthx found Elleran sufficiently scummy, there isn't necessarily any deficit to Town.