meh. I suppose that wasn't exactly the best example
And I don't have time to explain you. I told you in my initial wall that I'm not so much a word reader as a motive reader.
That isn't an excuse, you could've given a couple lines about this.
Post 90, you allow Leafsnail to choose who you vote for. As of then, you have no case on TML. You address him once. You want to know what for? Wait for it, it's important:
ADDRESSING AND DEFENDING ZANG
Well, if you had looked at the specifics, I voted TML for pouncing on questions and claiming them as useless before anything had happened to qualify them as such. It looked more like TML was trying to shut down potential conversation.
Also, leaf didn't "choose who I vote for" helped me decide between, him, tml, and kat, sute, but he didn't dictate the vote.
Yu
. TML hits Zang up for useless questions and then you proceed to be convinced into voting for him.
From this point, you are almost constantly pushing up a TML lynch. Constantly. 105, 107, 110 are all quick examples as such. Your case would continue to get more indepth as you basically selected him for an attack target, even while debating through with MrO for almost 100 posts.
Incorrect. 105 and 107 are asking about shos's choice of who to vote. 110 wasn't even me pushing him, just continuing the discussion that started earlier. Sure, my was on him, but I wasn'tusing that to push him as it didn't read as scummy.
hell, in fact you and Zang have been seen everywhere as a pair. MrO pointed it out in 255. In fact, I'm almost ready to attribute the second vote to MrO pairing you and Zang.
so, just the fact that Zang's name showed in there means I was defending him? At that point I was pushing Obv because of his inconsistencies regarding his kthnx, nothing Zang-related.
`
To top it off: Who does VM refer to beside herself when I first make the claim on who is scum? Zang. And she'll be the one to hammer me, too.
When you first joined? Well, Zang was my trongest townread, so why shouldn't I balk?
