He has posted a lot of reads to make it seem like he is scumhunting but has actually explained nothing including his reasoning for voting or unvoting Venmar and hasn't really done anything productive for the town. Some of his meta was posted and I'll look at it later when I have time to read something besides this game.
I have a very slight town read on Venmar. I also have a leaning scum read on Kise and ArcAngel. I can't read sven. From majiffy, I've seen both incredible proscum and protown motivations throughout his posts. I'm getting a mixed read from BBmolla also.
ArcAngel- Do you have any actual content to add to the game?
Parama wrote:You have just sheeped onto someone, accusing them of sheeping.
That is what is called a random vote.
Majiffy wrote:The shitty vote, and the really pathetic attempt at disabling the argument of him-being-a-good-PL-by-reason-of-sucking.
1. I thought that vote was quite obviously random
2. I'm not sure what you're saying in the second part but I think it's quite unreasonable to base your opinion on someone's play from meta over two years old.
3. Are you actually saying that you want me to be lynched?
Bacde wrote:Town
Kise
BBMolla
Zang (Probably)
Probably Bacde's scum partners
Majiffy (chainsaw defense w/ toasty sheep)
Ms Marangal
Svenstagel stahl
Toasty (obv chainsaw defense)
Why do you give reasoning for two reads but not the others? What is your reasoning for the others? Also, why did you vote someone who you didn't even list as a scum read?
Bacde wrote:I don't have any clear reads on anybody else... Except maybe Parama who was actually pretty funny too
So then what is your read on Parama and why did you not include it with the others?
Bacde wrote:Majiffy might be town
Sven is town tho for being hilarious
I'm cool w/ Parama
Again, what is your reasoning for these reads? In case you didn't know, being hilarious is not a valid town read.
Ms Marangal wrote:BEcause that wagon was a RVS wagon, Bacde's wagon is the first serious wagon and it has no base to it
What makes his wagon serious? I read kise's vote as random.
Bacde wrote:that sentence there where I said something about Venmar seems shifty meant that I do have a read on you, indicated by the word "and". The "and" was in reference to the previous keyword "except", meaning that Parama AND Venmar were exceptions to that clear read phrase
However, the capital "A" in "And" and the fact that it is on a seperate line indicate that it was a seperate statement then your exception to Parama.
If this is true though, then why separate Venmar from your other reads?
Venmar wrote:Kise and BBMola are likely town tbh.
why?
Bacde wrote:apparently I'm also impossible for you to read
This is based on the assumption that you are town.
Bacde wrote:^^Note that Venmar modded that game yet seems to think for whatever reason that I am scum this game
Meta is not a free pass to scummy behavior.
Majiffy wrote:Bacde makes two very WIFOMy posts, Molla hops on the bandwagon reasonlessly after Kise starts it.
So your entire case is based off of his vote four pages before this post?
Kise wrote:If you want real scum, look no further than AA9, Four & Monk. Classic scum lurkfucks.
Besides the fact that lurkking isn't scummy regardless of how long it's been, the game just started less than two days ago. How can you reasonably accuse anybody of lurking?
BBmolla wrote:Already answered this.
Is there a reason why you could not quote it or post it again?
Bacde wrote:I don't think its likely scum will harp on people wondering why they are being townread
This is WIFOM.
Bacde wrote:Unvote
ok, who are we voting for then?
Why did you unvote?
Majiffy wrote:^ Scum Molla wouldn't actually be interested in following up on something as inane as Toastyscum Meta. Shows he's actually trying to discern the alignments of others, and thus is town.
So, why are you unvoting now over 100 posts later?
Majiffy wrote:Town Reads
{BBmolla, Ms Marangal, Toasty, Kise, Bacde, FourTrouble}
Scum Reads
{Parama, Zang, Venmar}
Nulls
{Lord Mhork, Sven, ArcAngel9}
That's some very good reasoning you have there.
Majiffy wrote:VOTE: Parama
Reasoning?