Kise wrote:She didn't respond to me. Whatcha talkin bout bruh?
AA's next post was basically "I don't really give a shit what you think about me Kise. So I'm just gonna scumhunt."
Kise wrote:And yes, you lurkerfucks may not be scum but you're good candidates to look into. Typical scum, you ask about? Yeah those guys don't like to be cervix deep into D1 conversation, else they get held accountable for stuff! Best bet is to chill and let town make their move and direct conversation first. That'll do it.
Explain to me how one can 'lurk' early in the game. If it was at fifteen pages with quality posts and not a bunch of Majiffy-Bacde shitposting, I'd think differently.
Sven wrote:Voting someone with 7 posts cant be bad.
Voting someone with 7 posts when *see above* is bad. Also, look at the time between the posts. I'd only consider it lurking if it's taken more than a day since the last post. a SIX HOUR gap between posts is nothing, and that's the highest time gap you had. Sorry I'm not on the internet 24/7.
Oversoul wrote:Toasty...why is it every game I play with one of you, both you and OS are always in it together? Is that some kind of toast thing you got going on?
We're from the same loaf.
Venmar wrote:Toasty was overly defensive and even backlashed in #356 for such a vague suspicion put on him by Sven. Couple that with his non existant contribution to anything that happened ( other than Kise ) and my still existant gut feeling he is playing to his scum meta, Toasty is my vote for now.
Um, no. I said earlier in the game that the lurkers do need to start posting, but that calling them scum this early is stupid. My post to Sven is no different.
Last time you said "I have a gut feeling Toasty may or may not be scum." You still haven't answered my question of why you were being so ambiguous.
And I don't really see how this is playing to scum meta--if I even have one.
@Kise: You're response to my vote is all like WHY DID YOU WAIT?!?!??!?!?! Is there something in the town handbook that says "town must post and at the immediate sign of suspicion"? Last time I checked, there isn't. I ISO'd you after FourSquare's post because I agreed with his assessment, and had a gut read prior.
Kise wrote:I don't see a hint of bitch in this post. Please break it down for me TT.
bitching as in nitpicking. And to me being all like "ERMERERD LERKERS" is exactly that. You can't think of any reasons to vote anyone so you pull the lurker card out of your ass.
Kise wrote:The second line suggests you find my posts scummy. The first line suggests I had room for pro-town ideas in the first place that I myself should have seen. So it's either I should have seen town content from my slot, or it's all scummy to you. Which is it, TT? You didn't have a problem with me asking Ven about my townness in 236. Why now?
Huh? Those lines aren't contradictory...It has nothing to do with whether or not there were "pro-town" things you should've seen and everything to do with not having any reason to ask that question. Who the hell asks someone why they have a townread on them? You want him to lay out a case?
"Hey guys! This is why I think Kise is town! REASONSREASONSREASONS."
"Oh wow, I really few that! Vote Kise for Town Lord!"
Town-reads should never go into detail anyway. Free info for scums.
Kise wrote:I'm going to ask you the same question I did to your pal FT: Are you able to iso me up til yesterday and show me what posts of mine were pro-town? I'm curious to know what I did that was oh so beneficial to the faction.
hmm, nope. Don't really see anything town about you but it doesn't mean someone can't have a townread. gut is a big part of this game.
ToastyToast wrote:It's bad in that AA9 is not someone I'm tunneling on. Sure. So where do you go when you choose not to ruffle feathers, TT? You didn't with my vote the first time you saw it in 236. Why now?
If you aren't ruffling feathers in this game you aren't doin' it right.
Why Now? WHY NOW? WHYYYYY NOWWWWW? Because that's when I decided to decipher the codes amongst all the shitposting. I'll post when I post tyvm.
Kise wrote:Done dicking around. Toast is hesitant nice guy scum who waits for FT to vote me before doing so himself. Look back at 236. I don't detect any voteworthy negativity coming from Toast there. He waited to long to jump ship.
How have I hesitated?
.....TastyToast....................lafdfjafhdhafue
good to know that hero and derp have joined the party.Enjoy the wall, bitches.
