Mini 1434 - Flavorless Mafia! D4: Not quite so silent

[Le Cupcake]

Votecount 2.1

"Stop being so active, we like it nice and slow here in flavorland."

ToastyToast (3): Majiffy, Venmar, Kise,
Fourtrouble (5): Bacde, BBmolla, Jake From State Farm, ToastyToast, Svenskt Stål
Lord Mhork (1): ArcAngel9
Jake From State Farm (1): Lord Mhork

Not Voting (1)

:

FourTrouble

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch, and 5 to no-lynch.

Deadline is April 23 @ 10:00 p.m. PST

[Svenskt Stål]

Those are some spite reads tasty.

@ Majiffy, I think the "FT´s lynch is horrible" is explained and I buy it. Besides tasty is actually trying to play the game which FT´s not doing. We run FT up to L-1. If he falls town I will shut up but I am generally uncomfortable following you with that shitfest in mind that you drove yesterday.

[Majiffy]

Actually, Majiffy, the only person I called scum in that post was FourTrouble

Actually, Toast, I think you'll notice I didn't say you called everyone scum in that post.

And Majiffy, you can't take one part of that post out of isolation. That's the problem here. You are making it sound like I was talking about FourTrouble void of mentioning Zang. I don't fucking need to mention Zang every sentence of a post that is says upfront that I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ZANG LYNCH.

That'd be fine, if you mentioned anything about the Zang lynch in the section I originally quoted. You hadn't.

Nice OMGUS, btw.

@ Majiffy, I think the "FT´s lynch is horrible" is explained and I buy it. Besides tasty is actually trying to play the game which FT´s not doing. We run FT up to L-1. If he falls town I will shut up but I am generally uncomfortable following you with that shitfest in mind that you drove yesterday.

You're advocating a policy lynch on Day 2 when we have someone very clearly scum-flailing all up in this thread.

No. Put your vote back on Toast.

[Svenskt Stål]

What no. I think he is scummy. I said L-1, I obv want him to interact. In the mean time there are enough votes on TASTY to get responses. We have three weeks, no rush to lynch.

Now YOU change YOUR vote and I might not have you as a "bad townie/awfull scum". FT should be at L-2, but wait for vote count.

[ToastyToast]

You're advocating a policy lynch on Day 2 when we have someone very clearly scum-flailing all up in this thread.

No. Put your vote back on Toast.

and now your forcing someone to go against their own read. more testament to why you are scum.

And it is not OMGUS to call someone scum for misrepresenting you. And you are.

And Majiffy, you can't take one part of that

post out of isolation.

That's the problem here. You are making it sound like I was talking about FourTrouble void of mentioning Zang. I don't fucking need to mention Zang every sentence of a post that is says upfront that I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ZANG LYNCH.

That'd be fine,

if you mentioned anything about the Zang lynch in the section I originally quoted. You hadn't.

...

FourTrouble's lynch is awful, and he hasn't done crap. He also has failed to come in and explain his decision to vote. The game's been open long enough, and it he said he would catch up on the game so he can't use that excuse to put off being productive.

The entire thing you quoted is about the Zang lynch.

Keep pouring out the lies, scum.

[Majiffy]

1) Your reasons re:FT point more towards policy lynch than scummy lynch.
2) Tasty has given responses. Really scummy ones.

[ArcAngel9]

1) Your reasons re:FT point more towards policy lynch than scummy lynch.

2) Tasty has given responses. Really scummy ones.

bolded statements looks like you're being desperate to save FT more then to lynch TT for scummy reasons.

[Majiffy]

And it is not OMGUS to call someone scum for misrepresenting you. And you are.

I could point to a number of times you have misrepped me. So I guess this is an admission of guilt on your end.

For what it's worth, I'd like you to show one instance - quotes provided - of me misrepping you.

The entire thing you quoted is about the Zang lynch.

Keep pouring out the lies, scum.

"and he hasn't done crap. He also has failed to come in and explain his decision to vote. The game's been open long enough, and it he said he would catch up on the game so he can't use that excuse to put off being productive."
Unless the

he

is Zang, none of this refers to Zang. No, instead, you're also advocating a policy lynch. Except you're parading it around as the be-all-end-all scumread from a shitty wagon "analysis"*.

*I use quotation marks because I feel not doing so would weaken the use of the world analysis in any other context.

[Kise]

unvote
VOTE majiffy

The tables have turned!

No way TT calls the person he's about to vote a bad lynch. The way you're pushing it? C'mon now. I'm not that dumb. That was not a slip by TT.

[Majiffy]

1) Your reasons re:FT point more towards policy lynch than scummy lynch.

2) Tasty has given responses. Really scummy ones.

bolded statements looks like you're being desperate to save FT more then to lynch TT for scummy reasons.

... Wait so because I said someone has been really scummy I'm more desperate to save FT than the person I've been saying is scummy for scummy reasons?

What?

[Majiffy]

And here comes either buttfuck mcretard town or scumbuddy numero uno to place a vote on me.

[Kise]

yeeeeeaaaah bring the noise I'll bring the TOYS

[Majiffy]

EBWOP: 657 *word, not world.

[ArcAngel9]

1) Your reasons re:FT point more towards policy lynch than scummy lynch.

2) Tasty has given responses. Really scummy ones.

bolded statements looks like you're being desperate to save FT more then to lynch TT for scummy reasons.

... Wait so because I said someone has been really scummy I'm more desperate to save FT than the person I've been saying is scummy for scummy reasons?

What?

yup, you read it correctly

Kise, what is the point of your vote, how does it going to help? What are you trying to do?

[Kise]

FourTrouble's lynch is awful

...

vote: FourTrouble

Just thought I'd point this out.

Trying to put TT out of context...Why? You should not have left out the rest of the

sentences

. It's not like TT said one thing in the 1st paragraph and something different in the last. It was all in the same paragraph.

Fourtrouble's lynch

on Zang

was awful. Why would Toasty say something and then change opinions mid sentence. Even as scum that makes no sense.

Except he claims that he explained that in the part I cut out with the ellipses. And that part that I cut out had no mention of anything even remotely related to Zang's lynch.

What does this mean? This means he fucked up. When he said "FT's lynch is awful" he meant to type a different word entirely from lynch but whoops, there it goes. And in his nervous haste, he done fucked up trying to explain himself.

That

makes sense. Because

that's

what happened.

Naaah, that was no slip. What are you talking about

[Kise]

1) Your reasons re:FT point more towards policy lynch than scummy lynch.

2) Tasty has given responses. Really scummy ones.

bolded statements looks like you're being desperate to save FT more then to lynch TT for scummy reasons.

... Wait so because I said someone has been really scummy I'm more desperate to save FT than the person I've been saying is scummy for scummy reasons?

What?

yup, you read it correctly

Kise, what is the point of your vote, how does it going to help? What are you trying to do?

jiffy is pushing this wagon on something that's not even a slip. I'm not being fooled by it.

[ArcAngel9]

Majiffy, Explain how TT vote on FT is worse than anyone's here.. I see everyone voting Fourtrouble becuz he had hardly said anything and more likely lurking to the death and his hammer has no meaning. Tell us what is TT has done is far worse...

[Svenskt Stål]

Voting ft because marangal had him scum AND his awfull hammer are also reasons

[BBmolla]

Majiffy's spewing bullshit

But it might just be Majiffy being dumb

Staying on FT for now. Where the hell is that guy?

[FourTrouble]

You guys need to slow the fuck down. I'll be back with some analysis when I catch up.

[FourTrouble]

Staying on FT for now. Where the hell is that guy?

You were in a game where I was far more inactive than I've been here and I was town. How does your vote make any sense in that light?

[Svenskt Stål]

No, you are getting lynched, pick it the fuck up.

[FourTrouble]

Voting ft because marangal had him scum AND his awfull hammer are also reasons

What's wrong with my hammer?

[FourTrouble]

You guys better not lynch me before I have a chance to catch up and figure out what is going on.

[FourTrouble]

Svenskt, why is venmar town?