In post 698, FourTrouble wrote:In post 695, ToastyToast wrote:FT should have explained his vote when he hammered, but he didn't.
Why did my vote need an explanation? It was pretty self-explanatory if you ask me.
so you are just going to ignore my posts towards you?
there is no way your vote could be perceived as self-explanatory since you didn't really explain your read on zang nor did you comment on anything being talked about. Hammering when people felt Ms Mangaral should be the one to hammer is also scummy