borkjerfkin (L-6): pirate mollie
Wisdom (L-4): buldermar, borkjerfkin, Fate
Fate (L-4): mantisdreamz, Remembrance, SE-Asians
Not Voting: AngelusW, Wisdom, Nachomamma8
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline is April 13th at 9:30 PM EST
In post 1078, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 875, Human Destroyer wrote:Because the scum team is SE-A/Rem/IaI
holy shit this scumteam call is horrible
absolutely horrible
In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:The biggest one, he was planning about the plan, but he didn't use his own plan. There is no reason for scums doing this
In post 1104, Wisdom wrote:In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:The biggest one, he was planning about the plan, but he didn't use his own plan. There is no reason for scums doing this
What if Nacho realized that Bulder's plan is more exploitable(worse for the town) than his own?
In post 1108, Wisdom wrote:What exactly do you mean by passivity btw? Can you quote a few examples?
In post 708, Nachomamma8 wrote:N1 PR here too as well.
in your next post, please say if you're NOT an N1 PR as well to speed up the process
In post 1080, Wisdom wrote:No, how many?
In post 1087, SE-Asians wrote:Fate really has wishy washy reads.
From I am innocent to us then to wisdom.
Without really proper reasoning
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Fate
In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:There is no reason for scums doing this except Nacho and Buldermar scums together, but there is no reason for Buldermar changed the plan if they are scums together. So, Nacho is town.
In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:Well, they didn't like how Buldermar jumped on the wagon before. Because Buldermar didn't read the whole thread but vote.
In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:Well, if Mollie wasn't unvote, was he going to hammer?
In post 1104, Wisdom wrote:In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:The biggest one, he was planning about the plan, but he didn't use his own plan. There is no reason for scums doing this
What if Nacho realized that Bulder's plan is more exploitable(worse for the town) than his own?
In post 970, borkjerfkin wrote:Yeah my issue right now w/ Wisdom:
You're really really really defending SE-Asians (and I don't want to call it a chainsaw because I don't know SE-Asians' alignment and I don't really care for purposes of this post) while being like "no it's totes ok to lynch SE-Asians" BUT FOR THE RIGHT REASONS
Like if you think he's scum (you've outright said you don't think he's town) you should not be directly impeding his lynch like this at every turn
In post 1015, borkjerfkin wrote:IAI wrote:So D2, what happens. Cops will say who they investigate, and by process of elimination that leaves who???? Docs maybe????
That's fine, I see your point, but I mean ANY plan we come up with works better if more of the cops are early than the docs. That's simply the way this setup goes.
In post 1018, Remembrance wrote:Notice I am not voting him. and I have infact, advocated for him. I don't vote town reads.
In post 1035, kuror0 wrote:I did that remark first I'm pretty sure. Even nacho quoted me. So now that IAI just resuscitates the topic and brings up things said before how is that specially towny?
In post 612, kuror0 wrote:I think the best thing we can't do is only make the cops claim, so all the available docs for that night if any, will know who to protect but scum will be in the dark if there is any doc for that night or not so they have to take even higher risks.
In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:Rem is town also. About this plan, scums must immediately change tempo because of town's plan, so almost likely the N1 claims come from town because if I am scum, I like to discuss our fake claim first in our QT in the night. There is many things to discuss, like what night and how many docs and cops.
In post 1104, Wisdom wrote:In post 1102, SE-Asians wrote:The biggest one, he was planning about the plan, but he didn't use his own plan. There is no reason for scums doing this
What if Nacho realized that Bulder's plan is more exploitable(worse for the town) than his own?
In post 1107, SE-Asians wrote:Allright, back from /LA.
Will discuss with partners over reads and such. yes,I do have a slight scumread on IaIand mentioned that Wisdom's passivity is something to be noted.
Before trying to catch up on the ten-odd pages I've missed,I'll just say that scum is often far more passivethan town.
In post 1112, Remembrance wrote:In post 708, Nachomamma8 wrote:N1 PR here too as well.
in your next post, please say if you're NOT an N1 PR as well to speed up the process
Objection. Can we kill his scum buddies instead?
@Se-Asians. I need to do an interview process for you I think. I'll just try to be on when you're on.
Good night folks.
In post 1120, buldermar wrote:
Dear Servant,
No we cannot - I demand that you put your vote on Wisdom.
Yours truely,
God