In post 798, Venmar wrote:I'm not upset? You and I kissed up early on, we became friends, I forgot about that, it's you who is bringing it up.
oh ok nvm i guess i dont understand your suspicion
but its wrong you'll see that though
In post 798, Venmar wrote:I'm not upset? You and I kissed up early on, we became friends, I forgot about that, it's you who is bringing it up.
In post 801, Venmar wrote:
Idk about that mate.
You be the 3rd vote, and quite honestly your play so far has been all noise and... well really not much else. Considering your reaction to things tends to be laughing it off, you getting all serious seems to be the opposite of what you have been so far up to this post?
In post 801, Venmar wrote:
Idk about that mate.
You be the 3rd vote, and quite honestly your play so far has been all noise and... well really not much else. Considering your reaction to things tends to be laughing it off, you getting all serious seems to be the opposite of what you have been so far up to this post?
In post 787, Bacde wrote:In post 783, ToastyToast wrote:In post 781, Venmar wrote:You keep telling yourself that Mr.OMGUS
I haven't had a town-read on you for the entire game, and decided you were scum yesterday.
You were on that FT lynch, Venmar. You were also on that Zang lynch. More reasons to vote you.
Also I was either role-blocked last night or you're investigation immune, so...
why didn't you out your other report?
Venmar wrote:I lynched FT because he made a legitimately scummy move by not claiming, it pissed me off ( which was evident ) and I hammered. I partially opposed the lynch in favor of Toasty's for a while, but gave in when FT just derped out.
In post 804, Svenskt Stål wrote:In post 801, Venmar wrote:
Idk about that mate.
You be the 3rd vote, and quite honestly your play so far has been all noise and... well really not much else. Considering your reaction to things tends to be laughing it off, you getting all serious seems to be the opposite of what you have been so far up to this post?
I vocally opposed the day 1 wagon of zang, with emotions mind you. Yesterday I got what I wanted but I was wrong.
Now when someone accuses me without reasoning that sets off fireworks.
In post 814, Venmar wrote:Omfg, AA9 no offence but you're the LAST person I will ever argue or debate with because IT DOESNT WORK. Read the thread, me and Majiffy have justified a TT scumread MULTIPLE times, but you're not capable of readin that, are you?
Someone give me one good reason for why Venmar-Scum would blow up and overreact like I did at the beginning of the day when things have been going so well?
In post 818, Venmar wrote:Sorry, i've cooled down guys.
@Sev - Well then in that case, vote for Toasty on the basis that I am bussing him. I also want you to reread the very end of 814 and give me your thoughts on that.
@AA9 - Why was Majiffy killed then? If TT was town then they probably would benefit from keeping him alive since a TT lynch would be easy with Majiffy around. Your analysis of me having not enough reason to vote TT is 1) not reading my ISO and 2) Extremely hypocritical coming from you.