Open 491: The Popcorn Mafia: GAME OVER

Ineffective · Post Post #17 (isolation #0) » Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:42 pm

In post 16, RachMarie wrote:@ minimal

Why would having you as gunbearer be awesome?

Becuase shooting is fun and two people are better than one obviously amiright

Seriously tho "shoot me" would be my intro if i was scum. First gut reaction of shooter would be " hes obvious town lets find scum" unless he considered the possibility that the statement could be intended to have that effect

Ineffective · Post Post #18 (isolation #1) » Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:44 pm

Even if you think you can shoot all three mafia on your lonesome, it doesnt justify asking for shooter to kill himself off and waste a misfire. Not a towny reaction imo

Ineffective · Post Post #31 (isolation #2) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:25 am

In post 27, Sanjay wrote:
Vote Count 1.1
Voting for
:

RedPanda (1): fuzzybutternut
RachMarie (1): Syryana
SodaSpirit17 (0):
Minimal (0):
Catlord (0):
Ineffective (0):
fuzzybutternut (0):
srand (0):
jeremylu (0):
fferyllt (0):
Syryana (0):

Not voting (9): SodaSpirit17, Minimal, Catlord, Ineffective, RedPanda, srand, jeremylu, fferyllt

The gunbearer is
SodaSpirit17
. No amount of votes does anything.

The deadline for day 1 is Saturday, May 3rd, at 7:30 PM EST, in (expired on 2013-05-03 19:30:00)

Ineffective · Post Post #32 (isolation #3) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:26 am

Ya that didnt turn out right i meant to bold the part where he said no amount of voting does anything for the fifth time

Ineffective · Post Post #33 (isolation #4) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:28 am

In post 20, fferyllt wrote:Hi guys

Weak intro is weak

Ineffective · Post Post #34 (isolation #5) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:33 am

In post 21, Minimal wrote:WAI ARE YOU ANSWERING A QUESTION DIRECTED TO US INEFFECTIVE? WE CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION OURSELVES THANKYOUVERYMUCH

@ Rache, because my scum-hunting is awesome and Messiah's scum-dar is pretty fucking awesome as well.

and Messiah didn't enter the game going "shoot me" he entered the game stating that he wouldn't mind being shot at when three other people stated that Soda should shoot us. we he never stated that Soda should shoot him, just reinforcing it. I also never stated that Soda should target us, I said it would be awesome if we were gun bearer but I never made it conditional like you are implying.

Pedit: Hi FFer

that is the equiv of someone self voting because there are votes in them... Usually an attempt to towntell. Still applies. And i never said or implied anything other than that. Scum tries to towntell. Town tries to find acum

Ineffective · Post Post #35 (isolation #6) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:34 am

Man i hate not havin an edit option when i post using a phone

Ineffective · Post Post #36 (isolation #7) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:36 am

Also you explained alot of details that wernt there......

He litterally came in saying he wanted to be shot

Ineffective · Post Post #53 (isolation #8) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:57 am

In post 39, Minimal wrote:
In post 33, Ineffective wrote:
In post 20, fferyllt wrote:Hi guys

Weak intro is weak

Scummy scum is scummy.

I can play that game too Ineffective.

and no, Messiah didn't. People stated that they should shoot us, all he said was "do it". all I said was "I second that Opinion! having us as gun-bearer would be awesome!"

neither of us stated that we wanted to be shot at.

Syry said shoot us or Ffery, the Srand seconded that in a way, and Jere outright stated that Soda should shoot us. You are stating things that didn't happen, trying to make us looks worse then we actually are.

equivalent of a self-vote, sure I'll give you that but town do it a whole lot more then mafia does so that point is moot.

Pedit: Sry contribute something please?

I may be tainted with my offsite experience but from that experience it is more often scum wifom than a town reaction

Sorry to make you feel uncomfortable. Im not trying to make you look bad... Im an agressive player.

That being said i also attacked rach indirectly in the same post and.... Lets be honest... Ffer`s weak intro was weak... Ill move on to other targets rest assured.

Ineffective · Post Post #55 (isolation #9) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:03 am

In post 52, fferyllt wrote:
In post 50, Minimal wrote:
In post 48, fferyllt wrote:I think syryana's idea has merit. What about you?

you mean his, Shoot either one of us Idea? sure it does, and his reasoning for it makes sense. I wouldn't mind having you as a gun bearer though Syry saying he wants it for himself, but not wanting it for himself makes me think he's mafia. Then again, I always think he's mafia so maybe I'll talk to Messiah about him

Yeah that idea. Having the gun in the hands of someone with a good scumdar makes sense. How is SodaSpirit's scumdar?

It makes sense if you feel safe allowing town to throw the games energy into a handful of players and shoot people based off of if you think they will shoot right or not. Tbh thatsounds like shit logic.. Sure, shoot amongst players that are good at scumhunting but not for that reason.... Shoot one that is scummy....... You being willing to let a towny off himself for you to have a gun doesnt seem like smart play if you are town... But the shot will never be fired on you day 1 because of the fact that you said it... Which was the origional point i was trying to make. Its an easy way not to get shot.

Ineffective · Post Post #58 (isolation #10) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:05 am

In post 54, fferyllt wrote:Ineffective, whether weak or otherwise, it's the same intro I use in nearly every game. I don't do RVS.

I didnt have that information!!! I guess its different when you are just starting a game vs being a replacement! Ill keep that in mind

Ineffective · Post Post #59 (isolation #11) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:08 am

In post 56, Ms Marangal wrote:Not sure FFer, I never played with Soda but he sounds new

Ineffective, no. Where did I say I felt uncomfortable? I was only making a point. You stated that explained Details that weren't there, and that Messiah actually stated that he wanted to be shot at. I was correcting you, stating that you were wrong in that assertion. I could care less about your aggression, I can be aggressive to as can Messiah. I'm not seeing how you are attacking Rach?

also, Ffer said Hi, there's nothing wrong with saying hi.

Pedit: gah posts

I was disagreeing with rach`s assesment and saying it was a bad assumption... Also btw i mixed up you and minimal bc of you jumping on the same issue. .

Ineffective · Post Post #71 (isolation #12) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:16 am

@syriana The only person i genuinely apologized to was ffer... I stand by all the comments i made regarding the wifom issue/debate.

Tbh i like your reason for being ok with being shot better than i liked minimals.... Guns r fun.

As far as ffer goes she confidently stated thats how she intros every game... A bold statemwnt that can easily be checked.... If i didnt back off from that push id be an idiot pushing on a null "tell"

Ineffective · Post Post #82 (isolation #13) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:35 am

In post 77, Minimal wrote:
In post 56, Ms Marangal wrote:Not sure FFer, I never played with Soda but he sounds new

Ineffective, no. Where did I say I felt uncomfortable? I was only making a point. You stated that explained Details that weren't there, and that Messiah actually stated that he wanted to be shot at. I was correcting you, stating that you were wrong in that assertion. I could care less about your aggression, I can be aggressive to as can Messiah. I'm not seeing how you are attacking Rach?

also, Ffer said Hi, there's nothing wrong with saying hi.

Pedit: gah posts

Ineffective, this is my post and I would like you to answer this please

and no, I'm being honest. you are a funny guy Syry

In post 9, Minimal wrote:Do it.

I said im sorry that i made you uncomfortable because that is how i interperated your response... Hyperfocusing on one plainly stated initial reason to thow out a fos and acting like it wasnt directly stated that you wanted to be shot... . Do it is in reference to what came before which was "shoot minimal". How can you say that you want to be shot in more plain terms? You added all the fluff and intent after i pointed at you and acted like i had put words in your mouth... That made me want to puke tbh

Ineffective · Post Post #119 (isolation #14) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:32 am

In post 88, srand wrote:Town: Sodaspirit, Ineffective, Syryana, RedPanda, fuzzybutternut, srand
Mafia: fferyllt, catlord, sanjay, jeremy
Null: Minimal (hydras are always null), Rach

Also, soda should shoot as soon as possible.

He townreads me. Very scummy.

Ineffective · Post Post #120 (isolation #15) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:34 am

Epecially considering that is all your reads are right and you get your way the game is autowin. That always makes me take a second look at a POE list.

Ineffective · Post Post #121 (isolation #16) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:35 am

That

*if

all

Ineffective · Post Post #189 (isolation #17) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 3:54 pm

Jeremy you are bad at forum mafia and you should feel bad.

Your stance is weak. your posts have no content of any value to anyone....

Ineffective · Post Post #220 (isolation #18) » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:27 pm

Jeremy>catlord>fuzzy>minimal

This post is because the prod. I havnt seen anything worth responding to since i last posted.

I liked the pace at first but everyone is talking in circles

Ineffective · Post Post #274 (isolation #19) » Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:54 pm

Replacement dodge post.

Ill try to post soon. Havnt read since last post.

Ineffective · Post Post #345 (isolation #20) » Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:15 pm

Im back

Why hasnt jeremy been shot yet¿

Reading up

Ineffective · Post Post #346 (isolation #21) » Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:17 pm

Shoot him before he is replaced imo... If he is scum his replacement will come in and towntell like crazy to make up for jeremy being choked up

Ineffective · Post Post #368 (isolation #22) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:54 pm

Im actually not digging this jeremy/syriana interaction... Jeremy hyperfocusing on syr and ending up with a fairly predictable hypothisis seems like a waste of a post... Syr over-reacting seems forced... Especially in the way he backs down from it.

I could be horribly mistaken but from my perspective i see this as intentional distancing.

Ineffective · Post Post #369 (isolation #23) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:59 pm

Especially how jeremy end with "dude im reading you town im not stupid"

This makes it out like anyone who doesnt townread syriana's null behavior is stupid while simultaniously putting a distance. Between them as if they disagreedo anything substancial... I dont see any actual merit for this conflict... Unless i missed something

Ineffective · Post Post #370 (isolation #24) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:00 pm

Disagreed on*

Ineffective · Post Post #371 (isolation #25) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:24 pm

In post 298, RachMarie wrote:I am confused? I thought Ineffective was a new player? I remember he posted a while back in the intro to newbies thread and I believe his join date is very recent.. I was reading him as a newbie most likely newbtown...

As for my experience which is being debated... Yes im new here... And yes i am experienced enough at playing mafia to fake a townslip. No that was not me faking a townslip...

Rach acting like she didnt know my join date. Seems kinda odd considering its to the left of every post

Ineffective · Post Post #372 (isolation #26) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:28 pm

I mean she expressed that she thought i was new but i dpnt see where the confusion came from... I would assume that anyone saw my newbie posts and various interactions would know that i am extremely new here and extremely vetted in general mafia experience.

Not sure if this means anything... Hope this helps :p

Ineffective · Post Post #375 (isolation #27) » Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:48 pm

Makes sense

Ineffective · Post Post #376 (isolation #28) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:05 am

Jeremy
Srand
Minimal
Syriana

Only reason syriana is on this list is interaction with jeremy as stated earlier seemed awkward... Could be reading too much into it. If syriana is town he would be a good gunbearer if he doesnt hipfire. His cocky attitude could be an asset as going against the grain can seriously damage any organised efforts a scumteam puts foreward to mold the game

Ineffective · Post Post #377 (isolation #29) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:29 am

Im still the most recent post. Time to shoot someone dude

Ineffective · Post Post #381 (isolation #30) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:04 pm

In post 380, fuzzybutternut wrote:Syr
Srand
Ineffective

CrashTextDummie

Is this a shoot between list or a list of people you think are scum together?

Ineffective · Post Post #383 (isolation #31) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:18 pm

It litterally looks like he just took half of my shoot list and added me to it and/or listed random people...... I dont see how. Syr/srand can be scum together by any stretch of the imagination so the list is 1/3 scum at best

Ineffective · Post Post #385 (isolation #32) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:42 pm

Didnt answer the question aside the obvious statement i could have assumed without asking it. ill add to the question to make it more comprehensive as to what im looking for from you. Do you have any buddy reads? are the buddy reads inside or outside this list? Have you considered anything when forumulating this list other than "i want these people shot"?

Ineffective · Post Post #386 (isolation #33) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:45 pm

If you want to flatter me just say something like " these peope are scum and/or.would make good use of the gun"

Ineffective · Post Post #388 (isolation #34) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:55 pm

Hahahahahahhaahahahahahahah

You said exactly what i told you to say unabashedly without being afraid of looking bad for it....

Inserted a couple towntells too.

I must admit i like that post

Ineffective · Post Post #394 (isolation #35) » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:37 pm

In post 391, fuzzybutternut wrote:Punny.

No, I legitimately do
not
want the gun right now. I have no idea who is scum, and I don't want to kill someone who doesn't deserve to die.

This somewhat the opposite of what minimal represented early game that i found

suspicious. Fuzzy is reading town to me for valuinvg the gunbearers life over him having a gun. Seems like a genuine sentiment.

Ineffective · Post Post #402 (isolation #36) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:36 am

In post 400, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 388, Ineffective wrote:Hahahahahahhaahahahahahahah

You said exactly what i told you to say unabashedly without being afraid of looking bad for it....

Inserted a couple towntells too.

I must admit i like that post
Explain this then.

not sure what you are trying to ask or imply here

Ineffective · Post Post #406 (isolation #37) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:32 pm

In post 404, jeremylu wrote:i have no comment on shot list.

This post almost equals claiming scum imo

There is no real town motivation for not taking a guess... If you happen to get shot for fosses as town you now have the ammo to progress the game.

Ineffective · Post Post #407 (isolation #38) » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:47 pm

Fuzzy has posted in at least 5 threads at varying hours since he was asked to clarify.........

Ineffective · Post Post #459 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:46 pm

Was unable to connect for a couple days... Still catching up. Nach is looking pro-town... Not sure why he dedicated a whole post to point out my townyness but ... Thanks

Ineffective · Post Post #460 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:55 pm

In post 408, fuzzybutternut wrote:You said you liked my post, then you called me scummy for it. What else is there to clarify?

I dont see where i called you scummy for the post..................

Are you injecting sarcasm into what i said?

Ineffective · Post Post #461 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:00 pm

In post 394, Ineffective wrote:
In post 391, fuzzybutternut wrote:Punny.

No, I legitimately do
not
want the gun right now. I have no idea who is scum, and I don't want to kill someone who doesn't deserve to die.
This somewhat the opposite of what minimal represented early game that i found suspicious. Fuzzy is reading town to me for valuinvg the gunbearers life over him having a gun. Seems like a genuine sentiment.

Or perhaps you misread this post?

Ineffective · Post Post #464 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 29, 2013 10:53 pm

Guys nacho is scum!!!!!!!!!!

Ineffective · Post Post #482 (isolation #43) » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:41 pm

How teh fuck did he shoot minimal over jeremy.... Im gunna sulk and then thank the heavens that CTD is dead

Ineffective · Post Post #483 (isolation #44) » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:43 pm

In post 478, fferyllt wrote:I want to have a close look at who besides Syr pushed for you to be shot. I don't know if that will change my reads. Maybe.

Minimal was on my shoot-list i wasnt really actively pushing for a minimal shot tho. PREEMPTIVE DEFENSE

Ineffective · Post Post #491 (isolation #45) » Tue Apr 30, 2013 4:57 pm

I think i explained alot of it in my postin spree... The no comment on shoot list was the tip of the iceberg. couldnt see any town motivation forthat consideringthe format. Be back in an hour

Ineffective · Post Post #501 (isolation #46) » Wed May 01, 2013 11:08 am

Catlord is moving into the scumpile... changing the read on jeremy seems like blending... Blames it on iso then uses in game reasons already pointed out and compares it to nothing.

Ineffective · Post Post #504 (isolation #47) » Wed May 01, 2013 4:55 pm

Minimal please explain why i am near the top of your shoot list underneath one of the most towny players in the game and above the near uncontested scumfuck.... Id totally omgus you for that list if you wernt clear

Ineffective · Post Post #507 (isolation #48) » Wed May 01, 2013 5:01 pm

Oh lol...

That one word changing the whole meaning.

But ummm... That still leaves jeremy and catlord on your no shoot list which is equally as bad imo

Ineffective · Post Post #508 (isolation #49) » Wed May 01, 2013 5:04 pm

I honestly dont get how anyone could get a townvibe from jeremy and i herebye foss any player besides the clear who townreads him without a full explenation

Ineffective · Post Post #509 (isolation #50) » Wed May 01, 2013 5:05 pm

Brb study time

Ineffective · Post Post #511 (isolation #51) » Wed May 01, 2013 5:42 pm

Ok that makes total sense to me

Ineffective · Post Post #512 (isolation #52) » Wed May 01, 2013 5:44 pm

as for anyone actively townreading jeremy tho.... be brave and post some reasons... If i am wrong i am blind to it entirely

Ineffective · Post Post #524 (isolation #53) » Thu May 02, 2013 6:07 am

Panda... If you have 3 people in your POE scum list you have too many townreads.

Ineffective · Post Post #528 (isolation #54) » Thu May 02, 2013 2:32 pm

Jeremy and fuzzy need a prod

Ineffective · Post Post #530 (isolation #55) » Thu May 02, 2013 2:33 pm

Also if jeremy comes back and says "activity post" again just trust me and hipfire plz

Ineffective · Post Post #535 (isolation #56) » Thu May 02, 2013 7:53 pm

Ya going v/la seems like the right thing to do...

Ineffective · Post Post #540 (isolation #57) » Fri May 03, 2013 6:56 am

April fools... Im actually an uberninjna alt!!!

Ineffective · Post Post #541 (isolation #58) » Fri May 03, 2013 6:58 am

Damn i really should have come up with something a bit more obsued for that post. Oh well.

Ineffective · Post Post #544 (isolation #59) » Fri May 03, 2013 10:49 am

Can we wait for catlords replacement before shooting anyone plz? I want to get a fresh perspective.

Ineffective · Post Post #545 (isolation #60) » Fri May 03, 2013 10:50 am

Also anticipating nachos post

Ineffective · Post Post #550 (isolation #61) » Fri May 03, 2013 2:41 pm

Im really confused by that post jeremy. At least you have a fos now i guess... But it seemed like you were trying to appeal to RP and ended up fossing him. Why would you appeal to a fos if not for pure showmanship?

Ineffective · Post Post #552 (isolation #62) » Fri May 03, 2013 3:30 pm

You appealed to him with "im town" multiple times

Ineffective · Post Post #554 (isolation #63) » Fri May 03, 2013 3:54 pm

Im gunna look into rach's posts more since you are considering shooting rach... She has mostly flown under my radar as null much like panda

Ineffective · Post Post #557 (isolation #64) » Fri May 03, 2013 5:37 pm

When someone isnt giving off strong tells either way, i like to reread their intro to the game.

In post 15, RachMarie wrote:Hey there RP You gonna help us win again? You were totally fabulous in the last game. Syrana is probably town though or else really did not pay attention to the game set up lol.... It is kinda like the Kingmaker setup.

first post - sucking up to RP - commenting on a non-tell as if it were a tell

In post 89, RachMarie wrote:wow guys you post a book... After taking the Vicodin and NS putting in the 2nd does of antibiotics I slept for almost 12 hours. I have an ear infection, but will do my best to keep up here. I have not played with Messiah before but keep an eye on the MM head of Mini she is very good. I have stalked her games before and she is excellent and fooling peeps when she is scum. Happy to provide a link if you want.... I believe fery was also in that game. Cute poem there Syr... I do disagree with you on Majiffy, but he is not even playing in this game. So you gonna troll us all game? BTW yeah I like the popcorn setup and am thinking of modding one, will be happy to let you know when I do. Back to game comments. Soda has not played in a while and was fairly new when he played before I think I can get a link for that game iffen anyone wants it.

first substancial post... In reality purely filler. Tries to make a game related comment at the end which ends up being entirely irrelevant

In post 112, RachMarie wrote:If town shoots town then he or she suicides and the townie gets the gun, If the gun bearer shoots scum, then scum dies and gunbearer keeps the gun, like in last round RP shot 3 of the 4 scum and then finally picked wrong. All that happened before I replaced in. If the gun bearer does not shoot by deadline then I think another one gets picked, but not positive on that since I was only in the one game which was the first game played of this setup.

more filler/trying to look helpful/ stating the obvious

In post 156, RachMarie wrote:yeah the gun bearer seems to be awfully late to the party.... Its kinda hard to get into things when we have nothing from that slot...

tries to use gunbearers absence as an excuse for not contributing anything

In post 210, RachMarie wrote:@ srand why that specific order and those specific peeps? @ Syr Now that we have a shooter, can we get down to some serious business? like helping the shooter nail scum?
@ mod has it really been 3 days?

first signs of life. Still insubstancial. Tries to paint herself as swinging into action and subsequent posts are just more questions with no followup discussion or comments regarding the answers

Ya go ahead and shoot her

Ineffective · Post Post #558 (isolation #65) » Fri May 03, 2013 5:42 pm

If she flips scum, RP is probs town judging by first post... Unless it was pro distancing

Ineffective · Post Post #559 (isolation #66) » Fri May 03, 2013 6:11 pm

In post 548, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 540, Ineffective wrote:April fools... Im actually an uberninjna alt!!!

Wait...srsly?!?!?!

take a wild guess

Ineffective · Post Post #562 (isolation #67) » Fri May 03, 2013 6:29 pm

Ya ive been waiting for nachos post... and fuzzys post. They both said theyd post and fuzzy was all like.... Hmmmmmmm...

Ineffective · Post Post #570 (isolation #68) » Sat May 04, 2013 10:08 am

In post 569, fuzzybutternut wrote:I think
Minimal
Redpanda is scum.

This is just gut, though. If I the gun, i'd shoot RP, then if I kept the gun, I'd shoot Rach.

This implies you think they can both be scum. Please elaborate. I dont see it with rach sucking up to rp in first post. If she is scum she is likely town that was trying to appeal to rp in a "we are both town help me find scum" sorta way. also if rach is scum she hasnt put much effort in trying to manipulate how we read her so an intentional distancing seems unlikely. If you have better. Reads based on meta or something i overlooked please correct me.

Ineffective · Post Post #571 (isolation #69) » Sat May 04, 2013 10:11 am

"if she is scum she is likely town" lmfao...

*if she is scum she was likely trying to towntell by appealing*

Ineffective · Post Post #573 (isolation #70) » Sat May 04, 2013 1:18 pm

I think you have too many ongoing games fuzzy - minimal is the gunbearer therefore the "flip" has already happened

Ineffective · Post Post #574 (isolation #71) » Sat May 04, 2013 1:21 pm

Fuzzy is now on my never shoot list for 2 reasons

1 he doesnt know what is going on and must not be scum?
2 he doesnt know what is going on so i dont trust him with a gun
3 if he is scum then like uhhhhhh

Ineffective · Post Post #575 (isolation #72) » Sat May 04, 2013 1:23 pm

Btw syriana started out null, then started looking really town and is now back to null maybe even leaning scum for his coasting and resting on his laurel of previous towntelling

Ineffective · Post Post #576 (isolation #73) » Sat May 04, 2013 1:24 pm

@fuzzy... I want details on this redpanda scum theory

Ineffective · Post Post #577 (isolation #74) » Sat May 04, 2013 1:25 pm

Never shoot list currently consists of

Nacho - fuzzy... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ...

Ya thats all folks.

Ineffective · Post Post #582 (isolation #75) » Sat May 04, 2013 2:31 pm

Not towntelling does not equal scumtelling ---- do you see anything that brings him from null to scum?

Ineffective · Post Post #583 (isolation #76) » Sat May 04, 2013 2:32 pm

In post 580, fferyllt wrote:I am confused by that fuzzy/ineffective thing.

Thats because i misunderstood him probs

Ineffective · Post Post #586 (isolation #77) » Sat May 04, 2013 4:44 pm

In post 412, RedPanda wrote:The 18 days in one day phase was very fun CTD. thanks

His case consists of this post and it conflicting with RP being ok with delaying the day before that from what i gather.im too lazy atm to look up where panda delayed the shot.

I can sympathise with him thinking he is scum for townreading him... I do that sorta inverse omgus thing alot too... I dunno if it has any merit.

Perhaps RP should explain why he townreads fuzzy

Ineffective · Post Post #589 (isolation #78) » Sat May 04, 2013 6:31 pm

RP said he had a plan. Maybe hes trying to get shot? That woudl explain him taking a step back with the "nah im too good" mentality you speak of.... Maybe he wants bragging rights for dominating 2 games in a row? Maybe he thinks he will kill them all?

If no--- i can totes see him as scum with all this meta context...

If so--- hang on for a wild ride if you shoot him.... His head might get the best of him---

The reason i say all this is that i remember getting my head all pumped up thinking i was the best vengeful towny ever and ended up ruining a game

Ineffective · Post Post #594 (isolation #79) » Sat May 04, 2013 7:18 pm

I didnt read thoses posts that way but... You sound like you have more experience with her than i do.....

Who would be your ideal shot nacho? Only one.

Pedit:ya i havnt been able to make heads or tails of RP all game much like rach... You get even more town-points than before for using buddy POE to try to determine his alignment

Ineffective · Post Post #597 (isolation #80) » Sat May 04, 2013 7:34 pm

Had seen ffer as town but i have seen ffer as town in just about every contact ive had with ffer with no flips to compare it to sooo..... Ignore me.

Ineffective · Post Post #598 (isolation #81) » Sat May 04, 2013 7:35 pm

I guess i should look at her completed games instead of her active ones eh

Ineffective · Post Post #608 (isolation #82) » Sun May 05, 2013 6:58 am

Ffer ive learned first hand that if you are bored the best way to cure your boredom is to do something entirely off the cuff and have everyone townread you for being a complete spazz case or instalynch you so you dont have to bother anymore

Ineffective · Post Post #609 (isolation #83) » Sun May 05, 2013 6:59 am

Not for everyone i guess

Ineffective · Post Post #613 (isolation #84) » Sun May 05, 2013 8:08 am

Hahaha panda just fossed me... Where did that come from....

Dont bother explaining panda you havnt bothered to explain anything else either.

Ineffective · Post Post #614 (isolation #85) » Sun May 05, 2013 8:11 am

Can we just get back to shooting jeremy? Or rach?

Ineffective · Post Post #615 (isolation #86) » Sun May 05, 2013 8:12 am

Or anyone but nacho/ffer/fuzzy really

Ineffective · Post Post #618 (isolation #87) » Sun May 05, 2013 8:48 am

Omg it was a joke u nutter. I thought that was obvious

Ineffective · Post Post #620 (isolation #88) » Sun May 05, 2013 8:55 am

Stems from http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=225

In post 245, UberNinja wrote:
In post 244, Ineffective wrote:Aaaaaaaaa

im dying to see the proof of my incompatibility with everyone
Ineffective & UberNinja - 100% match

Ineffective · Post Post #622 (isolation #89) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:07 am

Pretty damn sure on jeremy... If i had the gun i would have shot him with zero discusion. Rach seems like she had a scummy intro after i bothered to reread due to minimal wanting a comprimise shot we could agree on... Syry RP are null to me atm... RP seemed to fos me out of nowhere with no explenation after townreading me pretty hard with reasons to back it up earlier

Ineffective · Post Post #629 (isolation #90) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:30 am

I can respect the POE

But im no chicken

Jeremy is obvious scum... How can he be both scum and a scapegoat?

also i really dont get how nacho being town makes ffer town unless you are assuming he has bad reads

Ineffective · Post Post #633 (isolation #91) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:48 am

In post 624, RedPanda wrote:Nachos town. So is Syryana and Ffery just went to into that town pile.

Its between you and fuzzy and I'm a lot more convinced that he's town than you, mostly because of some of the things you said this day and also partly because I thought you were town and minimal was scum and then that slip you made was something which made me think twice but I have nooone but you and fuzzy to choose from and one of you is definitely scum.

I skipped over the "is" asfter the "so"

My bad

Ineffective · Post Post #635 (isolation #92) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:55 am

ase for me being on a scumteam with jeremy makes no sense to me - town gains a mislynch everytime scum is shot--- as scum it would be more advantagious to soft foss jeremy in case he was shot and hardfoss a towny THAT would be the chicken move as scum--- your statements do not add up.

Instead --- even after minimal said she didnt want to shoot jeremy I continued to insist on him being scum and. Became frustated that minimal hadnt shot him yet... I also pushed for his shot d1 --- in a nightless game format buddying will be much more common and bussing will be rare--- especially since others had started to defend jeremy for his attempt at pretending to scumhunt....

also your "anyone who fosses me is towny" implication doesnt match up as jaremy fossed you and only you

Ineffective · Post Post #636 (isolation #93) » Sun May 05, 2013 9:55 am

ase=case my keyboard took a lil bit to kick in

Ineffective · Post Post #639 (isolation #94) » Sun May 05, 2013 10:03 am

Im just trying to make sense of your logic. Not too worried about being shot as i have one surefire shot that im confident about and one that might be a good second shot after a few considerations.... Jeremy>rach if they both flip scum id shoot syri for resting on his laurels and trust him to take care of the rest of scum if he is town

Ineffective · Post Post #646 (isolation #95) » Sun May 05, 2013 10:13 am

Iirc you posted pretty towny halfway through the thread - i can digit up if you want... Regardless nobody is hardfossing you right now and it seems like a good time to blend and be fairly inactive

Pedit: inb4 panda is taking my theoretical scumstrat to heart and not wanting jeremy shot now bc team

Jeremy is no noob hes been on EM a while and knows how to scumhunt

Ineffective · Post Post #649 (isolation #96) » Sun May 05, 2013 10:17 am

oh i forgot. Emoticons are always scum shoot panda lol

Ineffective · Post Post #652 (isolation #97) » Sun May 05, 2013 10:19 am

Dont shoot ffer

Omg i just slipped with an emoticon fml

Ineffective · Post Post #655 (isolation #98) » Sun May 05, 2013 4:47 pm

Does that mean the game is on pause till tuesday¿

Im straining to think of something that could develop between now and then

Ineffective · Post Post #660 (isolation #99) » Sun May 05, 2013 7:09 pm

Shoot the camper...

Fast.

Ineffective · Post Post #661 (isolation #100) » Sun May 05, 2013 7:11 pm

Wtf... (testing sig)

Ineffective · Post Post #662 (isolation #101) » Sun May 05, 2013 7:11 pm

Guys why dont i have a sig i pushed submit what am i missing

Ineffective · Post Post #663 (isolation #102) » Sun May 05, 2013 7:25 pm

Ineffective · Post Post #666 (isolation #103) » Mon May 06, 2013 7:01 am

In post 664, jeremylu wrote:GUYS CAN YOU STOP F----- MULTIPLE POSTING!!!!!!!! PUT INTO ONE DARN POST!!!!

also, can you write analysis on me to prove im scum?

1. I dont like walls of text personally

2. Proof? Pffft... This isnt a court of law and there is no "proof" of anything until someone flips

If you had read the gamme maybe youd know why we fos you?

Ineffective · Post Post #668 (isolation #104) » Mon May 06, 2013 9:37 am

In post 667, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 659, RachMarie wrote:I really am not seeing the scum case on Cat's slot... I think if he were scum, he would just use his RL stuffs to lay low and stay out of the limelight.
He also didn't really care about explaining his leaving thoughts at all; in fact, he seemed pretty content with just getting the fuck out and leaving us nothing.

also being inactive while you are being fossed ---- excuse or no excuse--- is no way to turn your slot around. If cat is scum the best chance of wining would be a replacement--- much like if cat were town --- i read this as inconsequential

Ineffective · Post Post #679 (isolation #105) » Mon May 06, 2013 9:50 pm

I have a plan

Ineffective · Post Post #683 (isolation #106) » Mon May 06, 2013 9:57 pm

Panda has a plan too

Ineffective · Post Post #684 (isolation #107) » Mon May 06, 2013 9:58 pm

Syriana do you have a plan?

Ineffective · Mon May 06, 2013 10:03 pm

Rach do you have a plan?

Ineffective · Mon May 06, 2013 10:22 pm

Not having a plan is scummy

Ineffective · Mon May 06, 2013 10:23 pm

new list

Panda me and syriana are town

Nacho do you have a plan?

Ineffective · Mon May 06, 2013 10:29 pm

Figured so.

rach ffer jeremy fuzzy and catlord are planless i believe - if they want to debate this they are free to--- we still have 1 plan slot available

Ineffective · Post Post #714 (isolation #112) » Tue May 07, 2013 7:55 am

Welcome jason... You remind me of myself when i replaced into a near lifeless game... Good to see some activity being encouraged

Ineffective · Post Post #719 (isolation #113) » Tue May 07, 2013 9:27 am

Hat fuzzy post threw me off-- he seems to be inable to comprehend sarcasm thus far and uses what would be sarcasm if he wasnt admitting defeat..... Then again who would admit defeat ?

Unless as wifom?

Ineffective · Tue May 07, 2013 12:39 pm

New list for best shots

Jeremy>fuzzy>panda>¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿

Ineffective · Tue May 07, 2013 12:40 pm

But then again panda DOES have a plan... Idk

Ineffective · Tue May 07, 2013 12:41 pm

Oh i forgot about rach

Put her between fuzzy and panda in that list

Ineffective · Post Post #742 (isolation #117) » Tue May 07, 2013 6:03 pm

I need to stop auto-townreading ffer in all our games

Ineffective · Post Post #744 (isolation #118) » Tue May 07, 2013 6:17 pm

I dont see jason as scum at all... But i didnt see ffer as scum so go figure... Jeremy and fuzzy and rach are the best shots by far

Ineffective · Post Post #747 (isolation #119) » Tue May 07, 2013 6:40 pm

His actions seem like agressive town... But you shot right last time....

If he is scum with consideration that ffer flipped scum i think that places fuzzy on that team judging by interactions. With jeremy still holding my number one scumbucket slot that places panda in the clear

Ineffective · Post Post #748 (isolation #120) » Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm

But im still thinking rach over jason.... So that Poe isnt ringing right

Ineffective · Post Post #752 (isolation #121) » Tue May 07, 2013 9:03 pm

Thats the syriana ive been hoping to see again. WB towny-syriana

Ineffective · Post Post #754 (isolation #122) » Tue May 07, 2013 9:19 pm

Ya im pretty scary..................................................................

Ineffective · Post Post #755 (isolation #123) » Tue May 07, 2013 9:22 pm

Usually i scare people into wanting to lynch me tho... What gives?

Ineffective · Wed May 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Inb4 i was wrong about both of them

Ineffective · Post Post #766 (isolation #125) » Wed May 08, 2013 1:48 pm

Ok well at least im half-right on my towwnreads so far

Ineffective · Post Post #767 (isolation #126) » Wed May 08, 2013 1:50 pm

@sanjay i think he picked up the gun cheerfuly judging by his agressive posts

Ineffective · Post Post #768 (isolation #127) » Wed May 08, 2013 1:54 pm

@jason i think we all know this is finally the moment that jeremy gets shot right?

Or do you want to see if he gets a replaced with a player that has a more townlike demeanor?

List is unchanged. Jeremy>fuzzy>rach

Ineffective · Post Post #770 (isolation #128) » Wed May 08, 2013 3:14 pm

K hes back- looks like shot is a nobrainer

Ineffective · Post Post #781 (isolation #129) » Wed May 08, 2013 7:50 pm

In post 775, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 747, Ineffective wrote:His actions seem like agressive town... But you shot right last time....
I thought Jason was a townread. Why didn't you defend him?

i did in an apathetic way... I was kinda disheartened from defending ffer and having her flip scum--- wasnt confident in my ability to accurately read town--- and have had heaps of other frustrations in a couple other games--- also i didnt townread catlord(his slot) in the least--- so i wasnt about to defend that slot too hard considering i could be wrong very easily--- so i just posted my impression and left it at that

Ineffective · Post Post #782 (isolation #130) » Wed May 08, 2013 7:52 pm

In post 780, Nachomamma8 wrote:Then as long as you don't shoot Syryana, everything's okay.

Ineffective · Post Post #785 (isolation #131) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:02 pm

In post 774, JasonWazza wrote:When did nacho join the game?

In post 416, Sanjay wrote:
Nachomamma8 replaces srand, effective immediately.

Page 17

Nacho jumped right into a null/leaning scum slot and immediately turned it into the towniest slot here

Ineffective · Post Post #786 (isolation #132) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:09 pm

In post 784, Nachomamma8 wrote:And yeah, you
could
be wrong but there were plenty of other shots you could've pushed and felt better about, right?

as you might recall ive been pushing really hard for a jeremy shot since day 1--- which continued. Through minimals reign... I thought we had comprimised on a rach shot--- who i had previously ignored and became pretty ok withafter some re-reading--- suddenly it was stated that rach wasnt being shot either... So i pushed on fuzzy a little bit and got echoed by ffer who was hipfired for making that awkward post--- so yes--- i pushed on 3 other people--- by the time i got to fuzzy i was almost defeated in my confidence to influnce the shot at all... So i just kinda posted my thoughts and let him react and let that be that----

Ineffective · Post Post #787 (isolation #133) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:12 pm

as far as the timeframe after the ffer shot--- there really wasnt much time and i had kinda put this game on the backburner in favor of a game i replaced into at 64 pages

Ineffective · Post Post #790 (isolation #134) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:18 pm

In post 783, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 781, Ineffective wrote:
In post 775, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 747, Ineffective wrote:His actions seem like agressive town... But you shot right last time....
I thought Jason was a townread. Why didn't you defend him?
i did in an apathetic way... I was kinda disheartened from defending ffer and having her flip scum--- wasnt confident in my ability to accurately read town--- and have had heaps of other frustrations in a couple other games--- also i didnt townread catlord(his slot) in the least--- so i wasnt about to defend that slot too hard considering i could be wrong very easily--- so i just posted my impression and left it at that
Why did one townread flipping wrong completely dishearten you?

Why did you take the word "kinda" and replace it for "completely"????

Ineffective · Post Post #792 (isolation #135) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:23 pm

Im not perfect.... I think if you read the rest of the game i have been pretty involved most of the way through.... Sometimes if i dont get what i want or make a few bad reads i slump for a little bit

Ineffective · Post Post #793 (isolation #136) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:24 pm

Prime example is me pushing on jeremy for a long time despite minimal being unwilling to shoot him

Ineffective · Post Post #794 (isolation #137) » Wed May 08, 2013 8:26 pm

In fact ive doubled up on posts compared to everyone in the game besides syriana--- who i have a margin over as well---- granted some of that is my consise posting style

Ineffective · Wed May 08, 2013 11:59 pm

In post 792, Ineffective wrote:Im not perfect.... I think if you read the rest of the game i have been pretty involved most of the way through.... Sometimes if i dont get what i want or make a few bad reads i slump for a little bit

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:02 am

My sig doesnt have anythibg to do with alignment... When i am on my game i make shit happen regardless of my alignment... Apathy is an indicator of my temperment, not of my alignment. I put my sig there to remind myself and others that being afraid to step out is worse than making mistakes... It doesnt mean that i always hold up to my own ideal

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:06 am

EG me as town is active if finding and lynching scum when i am in good mental fitness

Me as scum is active in lynching and decieving townies when i am in good mental fitness

Me as a player on this site has had a few games that have turned sour on me and me as a player had a slump for a day. I cannot specifically reference ongoing games but i think you will find a couple examples of this if you look

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:07 am

Me as town is active IN*

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:27 am

K fos me for having a bad day when ive been blatent fucking town all game.

Pro shit

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:38 am

Meanwhile rach pops in and says LOL for her first post in who knows how long and you completely ignore her...

Seems like im not the only one having an off day!

Ineffective · Thu May 09, 2013 12:43 am

Going to bed now... When i wake up ill be in a better mood and re-state the jeremy case for the tenth time and then you will shoot him without hesitation... and ineffective will be happy again

Ineffective · Post Post #808 (isolation #145) » Thu May 09, 2013 7:15 am

Bout fkkn time

Ineffective · Post Post #810 (isolation #146) » Thu May 09, 2013 8:13 am

I meant in the general scope of the game... You didnt take too long to do it

Im working on nailing some cheaters on another site RN... Just stopping into my threads for now

Ill be back with a comprehensive case on fuzzy

Ineffective · Post Post #811 (isolation #147) » Thu May 09, 2013 8:15 am

Assuming jeremy is actually mafia... Not too bad of an assumption tho considering....

If jeremy is town he`ll probs hipfire RP

Ineffective · Post Post #822 (isolation #148) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:04 am

In post 820, Syryana wrote:Because I'm town.

That felt effective.

I'd much rather make a case as to why you ought to shoot fuzzy.

im pretty much at the same place that he as with it-- i dont think that post was scummy at all-- since we just lkilled scum and gained another mislynch its more important to find scum than to defend yourself from a town perspective--- if you find scum and get shot, who cares? You have a gun

Ineffective · Post Post #823 (isolation #149) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:06 am

Im gunna ISO fuzzy and revisit all the posts that alarmed me--- if you shoot anyone but fuzzy i will be really confused

Ineffective · Post Post #824 (isolation #150) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:08 am

actually the "because im town did seem kinda shoddy--- but i was ignoring that part of it and focusing on the fact that he seems to be scumunting

Ineffective · Post Post #826 (isolation #151) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:27 am

In post 29, fuzzybutternut wrote:Yeah, 6 is the majority.

In post 110, fuzzybutternut wrote:I forget what the setup said. Can scum NK, or do they just choose another gun bearer?

In post 617, fuzzybutternut wrote:

Hmm.

Is Ineffective really a UN alt?

If so, shoot him.

Doing this point by point... Here we see what seems to be intentional dumbtells

There are a few others really recent that syriana quoted

Ineffective · Post Post #827 (isolation #152) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:29 am

In post 815, fuzzybutternut wrote:Omg 3 scum?!

In post 817, fuzzybutternut wrote:I wouldn't. I want Jason alive.

Omg 3 scum? after second scum was shot

"i want jeremy alive" after he is dead

Ineffective · Post Post #828 (isolation #153) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:30 am

Oh i misread jason for jeremy....

Ineffective · Post Post #829 (isolation #154) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:34 am

In post 103, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 102, RachMarie wrote:ummm Fuzzy you realize votes dont count in this setup right?
My vote has a purpose, regardless of it's towards a lynch or not.
Shoot srand. Or shoot me, and I'll shoot srand.

In post 387, fuzzybutternut wrote:I haven't seen any major buddying.

It's not that everyone on the list is scum. In fact, I put you on there because 1.) I can't make heads or tails of who is scum, and 2.) I think you would make a good use of the gun.

DO NOT SHOOT ME.
I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to wind up in that position right now.

Read the second post as towny at first until i realised the blatent contradiction in sentiment from one of his first posts

Ineffective · Post Post #831 (isolation #155) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:56 am

In post 162, fuzzybutternut wrote:Why would scum want to be shot? Then they die.

In post 289, fuzzybutternut wrote:Well, it's your decision who you want to shoot. You're going to shoot who you want anyway.

In post 299, fuzzybutternut wrote:He joined the second of April. 20 days ago.

In post 302, fuzzybutternut wrote:He may be, but epic mafia and MafiaScum are two completely different sites.

Stating the obvious

Ineffective · Post Post #833 (isolation #156) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:01 am

In post 128, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 127, Syryana wrote:OH GOD IT'S FUZZY KILL IT WITH FIRE

In post 718, fuzzybutternut wrote:Sure sure.
Def scum.

Reacting "sarcasticly" with emoticons in response to fosses

Ineffective · Post Post #836 (isolation #157) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:06 am

In post 100, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: Srand

In post 263, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: Catlord

there's something to post about.

In post 380, fuzzybutternut wrote:Syr
Srand
Ineffective

CrashTextDummie

Never giving reasons for fosses

Ineffective · Post Post #838 (isolation #158) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:08 am

In post 834, fuzzybutternut wrote:.........You're using emotes as a scum tell now?

No--- the combination of an implied scum claim with usage of emotes plus sarcasm struck me wrong

Ineffective · Post Post #840 (isolation #159) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:10 am

But ya i jokingly say emotes are a scumtell sometimes... And sometimes i actually believe it if it has the backdrop of awkward context like that... Also why did you. Post in RE: the emotes and not the other points

Ineffective · Post Post #842 (isolation #160) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:11 am

That "ya, sure, def scum (emote) was in response to a fos on you- it was an implied scum claim in the form of sarcasm with emotes---

Ineffective · Post Post #843 (isolation #161) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:12 am

Im not saying you blatently claimed scum--- but your sarcastic jerk response looked very awkward --- how are you even denying that?

Ineffective · Post Post #845 (isolation #162) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:14 am

In post 841, fuzzybutternut wrote:Because i didn't find it necessary, and that one was completely ridiculous.

So of the pool of obviously legitimate concerns you attack one post that may or may not be a tell? Instead of responding to the things that are almost universally indicative of scum posting?

Ineffective · Post Post #846 (isolation #163) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:15 am

In post 844, fuzzybutternut wrote:Uh, no, that was pure sarcasm. I thought that was obvious.

THATS WHAT I FUCKING SAID.... YOUR SARCASM WAS IN THE FORM OF"YA IM SCUM" STOP PLAYING DUMB

Ineffective · Post Post #848 (isolation #164) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:19 am

In post 847, fuzzybutternut wrote:What you call "universally indicative of scum posting" is actually not.

Stop scum raging. You called it an implied admittance that I was scum, and it wasn't.

actually - dumbtelling, posting obvious statements, not giving reasons for fosses because you dont have any reasons (consistantly)and lurking the entire thread in combination with each each other are ALMOST universally scum motivated--- as i said

also. I never said you "admitted" to being scum - i said you "implied a scumclaim using sarcasm" stop twisting my words

Ineffective · Post Post #849 (isolation #165) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:21 am

and the fact that you are still responding to that one post when i gave. A WEALTH of valid points to respond to (even if you consider that one in bad taste) shows me you have no defense or reason for your other actions

Ineffective · Post Post #852 (isolation #166) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:29 am

Scum defensive mode 101: debate the weakest argumment and ignore the rest

Ineffective · Post Post #855 (isolation #167) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:31 am

Ok cool im outty then i got threads to catch up on and cheaters to hang

Ineffective · Post Post #859 (isolation #168) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:58 am

In post 858, fuzzybutternut wrote:I thought there was 3.

This is obviously false bc when you were commenting on how new i was to MS the reason why it was being discussed because i made a post that said "even if you shoot all three scum" and they were trying to figure out if it was intentional or not--- in reality. This was obviously discussed already and you were part of that discussion. That was early game when i wasnt thinking about how many scum there were and had nothing to do if i was new or not but rather had more to do with me not thinking through my posts--- you were there for that--- how can you feign ignorance? and blatently pointing it out repeatedly is a sign that it was intentionally inserted

Ineffective · Fri May 10, 2013 11:38 am

Mfw fuzzy didnt even get knocked unconcious

Ineffective · Post Post #868 (isolation #170) » Fri May 10, 2013 1:16 pm

In post 867, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 851, JasonWazza wrote:btw just so everyone is aware, if i shoot fuzzy and he flips scum i will instantaneously shoot my highest scum read.

I don't care how annoying that is.
if your highest scumread is ineffective, i guess i don't care

Wait youd really rather see me shot over rach?

Also... If fuzzy is scum and you are town you shouldnt really care who is shot after fuzzy... Bc if you arnt shot its auto and i dont think anyone would shoot you

Ineffective · Post Post #869 (isolation #171) » Fri May 10, 2013 1:18 pm

Also that post gives me pause bc i feel like you are fishing for his highest scumread

Ineffective · Post Post #882 (isolation #172) » Sat May 11, 2013 4:52 pm

Activity post. Been slaving trying to ban cheaters

http://www.epicmafia.com/topic/53930

Ineffective · Post Post #884 (isolation #173) » Sat May 11, 2013 6:43 pm

Yay 3 Scum down gg

Ineffective · Sun May 12, 2013 10:58 am

Lets rebalance. This somehow... There wernt many available paths to victory even tho only 2 townies had good reads

Ineffective · Sun May 12, 2013 10:59 am

I feel like i did a really good job for the position i was in and the game was near unwinnable

Ineffective · Post Post #925 (isolation #176) » Sun May 12, 2013 8:14 pm

In post 922, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 918, Ineffective wrote:I feel like i did a really good job for the position i was in and the game was near unwinnable
you did fucking fantastically
good game guys

I was hoping I was replacing into a scum slot because my dream is to win this setup as scum. Maybe next time, I guess.

GG

---thoughts at the time of my last game related post were that there was no way I could out towntell you.... So so rach, myself, and panda getting shot would be autolose and you were unshootable... Hence the order had to be fuzzy>syriana>panda shot in exactly that order to win, and i wasnt here to push the second shot in time :/

Ineffective · Post Post #926 (isolation #177) » Sun May 12, 2013 8:20 pm

In post 924, RachMarie wrote:next time maybe

I have played this game twice now I wanna say my scum budz were fun to play with... I really thought Ineffective would pull off the win for us since he was such a strong town read for most peeps...

RP you are just TOO good at this You definitely should be scumz next time

Sorry Nacho I felt guilty about you reading me as Town cause usually I am but not in this one lol

you have too much faith in me :p

The only way we would have had a good chance of winning is if jason didnt listen to me about jeremy and went straight to fuzzy, but i had been setting jeremy up as the "fall guy" for so long that i couldnt push on fuzzy till he was dead :/

My realistic hopes of winning this game died with ffer

Ineffective · Post Post #930 (isolation #178) » Mon May 13, 2013 5:43 pm

In post 929, CrashTextDummie wrote:I thought this was an exceptionally well modded game. Not a fan of the set-up, but I seem to be alone in this.

Well done, town!

Agreed. Sanjay is awesome and this setup is bad as is... I like the idea tho... I am devising a rebalance

Ineffective · Tue May 14, 2013 11:36 am

In post 931, Sanjay wrote:I feel like the mafia need some sort of power besides picking the initial gunbearer (and a lot of use THAT power was with SodaSpirit disappearing immediately after confirming).

So far i have come up with severa ideas for mafia powers... I think the best idea i have come up with so far is :

after the first mafia has been shot, the remaining 3 get to pick one mafia player to carry a Dayvig armor piercing sniper rifle to be used via a mod pm one time so long as the chosen mafia lives until he decides to shoot

That way after ffer was shot, i could have decided to shoot nacho or panda--- both of whom were making the game incredibly difficult to win.

Ineffective · Post Post #934 (isolation #180) » Wed May 15, 2013 9:31 am

I pride myself in my scumgame above any other aspect of my game... I feel like i know how to manipulate around most situations---

If i had a choice at any point... Betweeen shooting a gunbearer, a. Towny that was "unlynchable", and a townyThat knew all of the mafia... I would choose to shoot the unlynchable towny. Im sure other people would pick different ways for different reasons, but in my view , shooting someone who is mod-confirmed cclear and knows too much is a "fear-tell" that gives off too much information, wheras shooting someone that will never be shot is performing a simple math game that will increase your odds of winning, and cannot easily be read into as anything else.

If anyone is fossed and shot and has the gun, you can already consider them a dead player IMO because people are easier to manipulate when their life is on the line if they shoot wrong, and even if they shoot right they will almost ceartainly die eventually///

However, the player that will never be shot--- he will add to the number of mafia that MUST stay alive for you to win. EG if rach or myself was ever shot i knew the game was over because nacho would never be shot--- making 2 clears when the game was in 3-player mode--- auto