The quotes are from oldest to newest, so the ordering has nothing to do with my opinion on its authors.
Ravenpaw doesn’t give me any scumvibes and has gather the most townie-points so far in my book. She responds to a lot of posts, breaking them down in different parts and asking questions, spurring debate. She also does not evade the (admittedly very few) questions in her direction.In post 24, Ravenpaw wrote: The only person I'm familiar with on this player list is Candillian, who I found very easy to read as town.
This quote is most memorable for me, because the interaction between Candillan and her should prove to be very interesting. From what I’ve seen, she’s not yet convinced on Candillan’s town-leaning. It might be too early for that, but it could also be an indication that Candillan is playing differently compared to before.
The above quote is LnGrrrR in a nutshell so far. In this stage I like those spurring others into action, and that’s what LnGrrrR is doing. So far, so good, but I am looking forward to his views on the other players, which he promised to prepare soon. Voting the inactive is a nullread for me, but I like his style.In post 30, LnGrrrR wrote:Actively or non-actively lurking, neither help the town. And sure, they will be prodded, poked etc, but I assume this first day will last more than 24 hours. Of course, some of us are probably more eager to play the game than others. Still, I would rather use my vote to convince lurked to post, or to show those who are absent that they need to get in here.
The above quote is numberfour in a nutshell. At the beginning of this debate, I thought numberfour was leaning town because he was diametrically opposing the IC’s opening post, but now not so much anymore. He’s too stubbornly clinging to the notion of “random lynching” and attacking this idea, but in the end there was actually nobody ever advocating it. This has been repeatedly explained to him, but yet he insists on fighting this imaginery “enemy”. The only ones needing an artificial enemy is scum, and numberfour seems to be intent on devising one. Added bonus of his strategy is that it does not motivate activity. Slight scumread on this guy.In post 37, numberfour wrote: There's nothing for the town to go off of and if we mislynch that's two townies dead at the start of day 2 giving the mafia a free kill anyway.
RachMarie, our IC, is I think fairly absent from substantial debates and from the game in general. The vast majority of her posts were IC-memos, and she has shared no reads whatsoever. Maybe she, as an experienced player, is showing restraint in sharing her views, until the point where there’s something more substantial to say and base yourself on, but then again, from an experienced player I expected a more pro-active, seeking approach. RachMarie seems to be more inclined to wait and watch, which is not really consistent with the above quote from her. You don’t get a lynch by waiting and watching. She’s also one of the people who told me I was going into a WIFOM train-of-thought, but I don’t she adequately proved the point of that statement.In post 52, RachMarie wrote: That being said, we will have a lynch on D 1...
He (or she? I see Syryana is often referred to as “she” for some reason) has been my main subject of attention so far, so I have the feeling I shouldn’t add too much more to it. He’s my strongest scumread for the moment, mainly because of the above quote. I find it overly defensive, and the way he consciously avoids appearing to be scummy, gives me a scum-read. Also told me I’m heading to a WIFOM, in my eyes a reasoning that is just a generic line of defense that is hard to break through.In post 61, Syryana wrote: I will tell you in general I refuse to answer questions that lead me to give you my own interpretation of my playstyle, otherwise known as self-meta. I strongly suggest you head to my wiki and see my playstyle for yourself. I personally think self-meta is awful (if not outright scummy) and will in the future refuse to answer questions that lead me into it. You want to know how I play? You gotta experience it or read my completed games.
What I do like about him is the way he votes, and how he adds very easy to understand reasons to this vote . It spurs debate and makes it possible for those he votes on to defend themselves in a meaningful way. Where I need long exposés to get my point across, he can keep things simple. I like that.
Only one post, so not much to go on. The “I know almost no one here, but I hope I’m not too late for a little RVS” sounds very weird to me, and not only because the first part of the sentence has got nothing to do with the second. I don’t see the relevance of the first part either. Why does he think it’s important for us to know that he doesn’t know anyone here? Sounds like he’s already distancing himself from any other player. Why? Slight scumread.In post 71, Archetype wrote:Ok, sorry. Here. I've been a little busy.
I know almost no one here, but I hope I'm not too late for a little RVS
VOTE: Vote: Candillan
One post, one broken promise. Not a good start. Still a nullread, practical things/real life could have gotten in the way.In post 76, shaboostein wrote:Sorry about that. Just checking in. Ill read the 4 pages tomorrow morning.
In post 95, Candillan wrote:No reason in particular. I mean, I just read you in ISO, and your posts do seem more town than when I read them before, so I dunno.In post 90, LnGrrrR wrote:Candy, any reason in particular I'm giving you scumvibes? Or just a "feeling"?
Gives me a funny feeling, he seems a bit dodgy to me, also because Ravenpaw still seems wary of him. I don’t like the way he apologizes for inactivity, while he has not been inactive at all. And I mainly don’t like the above quote. It feels to me he added LnGrrrR completely randomly to his scumreads, and can’t defend this choice as soon as he’s asked for it. If reading his ISO doesn’t make him suspicious, I don’t see how reading LnGrrR in the thread makes this any different. Scumread.
I think this covers all of you. My main scumreads are thus: Syryana, RachMarie, ArcheType and Candillan. Which is obviously too much, but the daystage is still young so it’s not bad to keep the options open. I obviously welcome any comments to this list from everyone.
I’ll move my vote for the sake of variation, and to rattle RachMarie’s cage, as I expect the most interesting results from this one, because especially as an IC, she can’t afford to ignore it.
UNVOTE: Syryana
VOTE: RachMarie