Open Role 5: Switch Mafia. Over. - before 384

spectrumvoid · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:58 pm

Shot multiple times... hm...

Here's SL's list for future reference

Neutral
Jules
Kelly Chen (replacing conflux)
klebian
Mr Stoofer
Romanus

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:02 pm

I'm going to have to re-read from the beginning; but in the meantime, in case anyone hadn't realised, we are lynch or lose -- so let's be careful.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:07 pm

Hang on. I just realised that SL could have been switched off since we haven't managed to lynch scum.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:08 pm

spectrumvoid, what are you tyring to imply by this:

spectrumvoid wrote:Shot multiple times... hm...

There is only one killing group left in this game. Trying to distract and confuse the town?

spectrumvoid · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:41 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:Sitting in a dark police station, Shadowlurker was trying his best to continue to look for scum, dispite the fact that the crooked town council had completly shut down all funding, taken away his police car, fired all the other police officers working, and and even all electricity and phone lines to the building. And yet he still had not given up. He was sitting there, trying to read people's police files by flashlight to figure out who was behind all of this, when someone apparently kicked in the door of the police office and
shot him in the chest multiple times.

It's in the death scene.

klebian · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:40 pm

I just realized that we have a vig, so I guess yes, it may be interesting to note that. The vig may have been the switch that was 'left on'.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:01 pm

Oh yes. ~slaps forehead~

I was thinking that because all the mafia are alive they would have switched off the vig, but on re-reading the opening post I see that the mafia can't kill if they use all their switches, so I see the point now.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:54 pm

Mod: Jules needs prodding, because he's disappeared in his other games.

Kelly Chen · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:49 am

spectrumvoid wrote:Hang on. I just realised that SL could have been switched off since we haven't managed to lynch scum.

I don't understand this. SL being switched off is pretty much written into the night scene. I don't know what us not having lynched scum has to do with it.

Maybe you're talking about N0. Looking back I thought perhaps he had a guilty on you. But post 213 seems to shoot that down:

Unvote I feel like SV responded to the case against her appropriately and I don't really feel like IH is being genuine in his pursuit.

I doubt that ShadowLurker got a guilty on anyone N0. Which is not surprising I don't think.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:53 am

Yes, I meant night 0.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:18 am

Jules has been prodded.

Vote count: no one voting. 5 to lynch.

On another note, any night scenes are designed simply to be for the purposes of flavor. Trying to read too deeply into them is probably not a very good idea.

Lowell · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:23 am

Mr Stoofer wrote:I'm going to have to re-read from the beginning; but in the meantime, in case anyone hadn't realised, we are lynch or lose -- so let's be careful.

Eh, am I crazy for thinking a NO LYNCH might be the play here?

spectrumvoid · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:10 am

Yes. We have 3 mafia, 1 sk, 2 townies and cop killed. We have 8 people alive. Mafia can turn off doc switch, so there'll definitely be a night kill tonight. No cop = no night information. Mafia can also turn off vig, so they won't get killed. That leaves 7 people alive tomorrow, with nothing. No lynch is not the play here.

Lowell · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:13 am

Yeah all right. I forgot about all the funny functions. Carry on.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:17 am

Lowell wrote:Eh, am I crazy for thinking a NO LYNCH might be the play here?

WTF!?!?!

If you want a no-lynch you are either crazy or scum.

Romanus · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:28 am

I vote scum

Vote Lowell

Kelly Chen · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:02 am

vote: Relyte

Everybody was wrong who felt IH was going after Relyte with scummy intent. So look at him again. FOS: Lowell for screwing this up yesterday.

Lowell · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:59 am

Kelly Chen wrote:
vote: Relyte

Everybody was wrong who felt IH was going after Relyte with scummy intent. So look at him again. FOS: Lowell for screwing this up yesterday.

Yeah you're right. My bad. I'm sold on Relyte.

unvote, VOTE relyte

Romanus · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:22 pm

Just because IH didn't have scummy intent does not make relyte scummy. And I was on Relyte, for a while as I recall.

That turn made by Lowell was a little too easy for my taste.

Relyte · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:51 pm

Kelly Chen wrote:
vote: Relyte

Everybody was wrong who felt IH was going after Relyte with scummy intent. So look at him again. FOS: Lowell for screwing this up yesterday.

Let's look back a bit,

I never accused IH of being scum within a few days of the deadline... and if you look back, I was not on the IH wagon when he was lynched. *Cough* Lowell *Cough* I only defended myself against him for claims that were... dare I say it...

"stupid."

Once again, a case without evidence is being pushed on me.

klebian · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:12 am

Bah. I don't have a clue what's going on, and I don't have time for a reread.....
Will try asap to see what happened, since I don't remember anything from my first attempt to reread.

Kelly Chen · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:07 am

Relyte wrote:Let's look back a bit,

I never accused IH of being scum within a few days of the deadline... and if you look back, I was not on the IH wagon when he was lynched. *Cough* Lowell *Cough* I only defended myself against him for claims that were... dare I say it...

"stupid."

The fact that you didn't try to vote anybody to save yourself, doesn't say that much about your alignment.

Do you think Lowell's scum too? He kept you from being lynched you know.

Relyte · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:48 am

Kelly Chen wrote:
Relyte wrote:Let's look back a bit,

I never accused IH of being scum within a few days of the deadline... and if you look back, I was not on the IH wagon when he was lynched. *Cough* Lowell *Cough* I only defended myself against him for claims that were... dare I say it...

"stupid."
The fact that you didn't try to vote anybody to save yourself, doesn't say that much about your alignment.

Do you think Lowell's scum too? He kept you from being lynched you know.

I never said he was scum.

But if you're going to bring this up, does him saving me make him not scum?

I am not accusing him in anyway, just making a point.

Kelly Chen · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:36 pm

No, but it seems like it might be worth some points to you that he had the sense to unvote you.

I don't see why you even mentioned Lowell if you didn't mean to cast suspicion on him.

Maybe you're just saying you'd prefer it if we looked at the IH wagon instead of you. You after all "never accused IH of being scum within a few days of the deadline" so you're probably town right?