I don't like either LAL Theory, both suck. I don't like policy lynches period and I think bringing it up is stupid
Proof that MM is voting for me because of this.
Do you see the bolded here? You really think that I'd fake talk to myself? Its obvious that Mara was talking to me.
+ look at the timing of this. You posted your questions about LAL in 42. I (Nero) posted 3 times and did not vote you.
Noeffenclue's vote on this is actually a lil' bit scummy since scum do this vote piggy backing all the time and it was an obvious false reason so it looks kinda lynch happy to vote without fact checking.
I don't like either LAL Theory, both suck. I don't like policy lynches period and I think bringing it up is stupid
I can spout my game philosophy if I want.
vote:TIP
I am 100% sure that I am the author of this post and the fact the Mara didn't sign her post as Sugar like she's been doing is a dead should be a dead giveaway.
In post 62, Sugar Cain wrote:I keep seeing you post elsewhere on the site but like half the players are ignoring this ame in favor of other. Our vots gonna sit on you tell I find something else to yell at.
That's why I was voting you but now I think I want to kill NEC so we'll see what Mara has to say.
In post 62, Sugar Cain wrote:I keep seeing you post elsewhere on the site but like half the players are ignoring this ame in favor of other. Our vots gonna sit on you tell I find something else to yell at.
That's why I was voting you but now I think I want to kill NEC so we'll see what Mara has to say.
You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.
In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.
vote:NEC
Nope.
We have our own reasons for voting you. And I'm curious if anyone else sees what we're seeing. Hence the unsupported vote.
In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.
vote:NEC
it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts
In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.
vote:NEC
it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts
So now you're being cheeky and expecting me to read your minds. HAH!
In post 90, Sugar Cain wrote:You used Pope's same false reasoning as a reason to vote us (yes, he didn't vote us but he was calling us a liar) and when his reasoning was proven false you kept your vote on us. I think any reasonable townie would admit to being in the wrong once the reasoning was disproven.
vote:NEC
it is quite amusing how you claim to be able to read our collective mind and want to "kill" us for our yet unstated thoughts
So now you're being cheeky and expecting me to read your minds. HAH!
you already claimed to have done so... Why stop now?
Votes us with no reason given.
Nero guesses at reasoning.
"haha you're wrong."
By not giving a reason it allows for a lot of flexibility. By leaving a blank canvas it allows you to "agree" with anyone. Why are you afraid to commit to a reason?