hey, a chainsaw!!! Also it was already sorted out that I made that vote. Why are you seemingly not paying attention and rehashing old arguments?
Post #81 jumps to a conclusion about the reason for our vote, calling it a piggy-back
So I was just supposed to guess why you voted me?And when I guessed wrong I ws scummy for it? WTF is this shit?
In post 155, NoEffenCllue wrote:Post #85 comes off...creepy. "I want to kill", not "I want to vote" or "I want to lynch". It's usually a scum mindset that phrases things this way IME.
From now on I want you to refer to me as Admiral Akabar ‘cause you JUST FELL INTO A TRAP!!!
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=275
In this game the scum pushed me as scum based on using the word kill instead of lynch.
We spar for a couple more posts, and then Cain disappears. And we hear nothing from Sugar Cain until nearly 48 hours later.
ok, you (ffery head) disappeared after my 145 yet you were still posting all over the site. Why did it take you so long to respond?
1."why y'all changing your meta." - explained already. It's not "my" meta. I've been compromising my game parameters while I learned site meta and adjusted to a months-long game format, and figured out how to fit the style of play I prefer into this format.
Fair enough. I once played in a game with Mastin2 where he made a big hoo daa about changing his meta/game play w/e. While you can rightfully point about that you aren’t mastin2 I’m still wary of change in playstyle for apparently no reason.
2. "And you never will 'cause you have nothing. On one hand this could be some bullshit reaction test. On the other hand (and what its looking like to me) is you're scum and by saying "I hope people are seeing what we are seeing" and expect another player to claim what they "see" and you'll latch onto it." - purely defense by offence, which has been the case all along. He doesn't want to hear what our case consisted of. he wants to dismiss it sight unseen.
And yet you were given opportunity after opportunity to clarify, but you didn’t. Why didn’t you?
3. "Other than being flat out wrong about our alignment, this is also extremely anti-town for a few reasons. 1.) No townie in their right mind is going to blindly sheep you."" - hoping for a self-fullfilling prophecy?
ummm no....this isn’t Epic Mafia where players get lynched and bandwagoned for the hell of it. Unless you are a Matt P or someone with a super duper reputation you have almost no chance in getting a sane town to follow you on a lynch that you are unwilling to back up with a case.
"I see no reason for a supposed town (with a pre-made case) to not voice their opinion and attempt to convince the town that we should be the days lynch." - every new post he's made is a case on its own. I think he realizes this, and hopes to distract from it by handwaving about the unseen case.
That would be ‘cause there’s not pro-town reasoning in not playing your cards.
For example, lets pretend that I have a slamdunk case on Emp, are you going to help me lynch Emp?
"And the longer you withhold said "reasoning", you hold the game hostage. Which transitions nicely to my second point.
- "holding the game hostage". as though that is even possible while actively participating.
Have you realized that there hasn’t been that much going on other than me and you? Once you posted your “case” we started getting reactions and stuff. This game was not going to move forward until you posted your case.
2.) We have 6 days left. The longer you withhold said reasoning the less time that the town has to discuss the case on us and possibly/hopefully on someone else. There's also the fact that early game no lynchs are a bad idea so with holding reasoning and not allowing town to discuss...the closer to dl town will say "fuck it" and lynch willy nilly."
We do not have six days left. At the time this post was made, we had 10 days. This creates a false sense of urgency, in the hopes of getting other players to dismiss our concerns. And, hilariously, this section comes off as though he knows he is talking to a town player and making a plea for reasonableness.
I’m going to concede this since, as this head pointed out, we had 10 hours when I wrote this. I didn’t understand it was one of those countdown timers, I thought we had 10 hours starting May 11th. Still this game was not going to move forward until NEC pulled out her “case”
NEC, why were you so adamant that you did not want to release your reasons for suspecting our slot but you broke down and released your reasoning?
