In post 55, Amrun wrote:In post 53, bubbajack8 wrote:I don't like Amrun trying to get who he thinks the noob is lynched. I think he's saying I'm a noob as an excuse to lynch me for voting him. Which is an epic OMGUS. And pretty damn scummy.
Look, you're legitimately terrible at this game and also inexperienced.
a) I didn't even know you were voting me for me and I will never, ever care.
b) OMGUS is not even remotely a scum tell.
c) being noob isn't a reason to lynch someone. It's actually a reason not to vote for you if you just have no fucking clue what you are doing. You're insisting that you're competent, but your actions don't even approach competent. So why is that? Is it because you are just mistaken, and are incompetent? Or is it because you are still too new to know how to fake town competence as scum? In other words, are you just always terrible, or are you terrible because you're scum? So it's really quite important to ascertain your level of experience and other's opinions of your general play -- because I actually care about determining your alignment and reading other people's posts, which you either can't or don't.
A. I don't believe one word of that bullshit.
B. (I didn't even know you were voting me, but OMGUS isn't a scumtell anyway.)
C. If being a noob isn't a reason to vote me, why the fuck are you still on me? You say I'm incompatent at this game, yet you keep voting me. Now you say people who are incompatant shouldn't be voted. So which one is it?
I read other people's post, I derped up once. Whoopdy fucking doo.
Read my games. I hate using it, but read my fucking games.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=27373 I was scum. And won. Tell me I don't know how to be competant.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=27795 Played with Rob and fuzzy as town. (As well as GIF) Knew Rob was scum (for all the wrong reasons)
I'm not incompetent, I think you are the incompatant one, What real reason have you given for voting me? Absolutely none.
In post 57, HookerPunch wrote:Oh, the joys of day one lynches. Apparently, we're out of the fun stage--so I should VOTE: Unvote. In any case, while using the first two pages as evidence is usually a bad idea, I believe the most 'scummy' as of now are fuzzybutternuts and the bickering lovers here. That said, I am curious as to our sole non-voter pitula. Has he even posted? I don't believe so.
I hate to defend fuzzy, but he behaved like this in http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=27795 and was town. Lynched D1. I'm not going to lynch him quite yet.
Yo bro, you should read.
He gave reason for not voting. "using the first two pages of evidence is a bad idea"In post 57, HookerPunch wrote:In any case, while using the first two pages as evidence is usually a bad idea
Ah,
who called me whydoieventry? That was Yeong right? (Or Guyinfreezer)
Answered in 65.
I said in the game of mafia I'm pretty damn experienced. On MS I have 3-4 games. Don't twist my words.In post 67, JuanJuan wrote:Well I sort of said it just now, I think he's genuinely shocked that people have wagoned on him, but I don't think if he was scum he'd get so publically angry, especially so early. I find it funny that 3-4 games make him 'pretty damn experienced'.
My bad about the L-1 comment earlier, my mind was in another game.
Also I could see the thinking I'm at L-1 post pretty scummy. I've seen it in a game, but considering there's no point in quickhammering me, I'll leave it be. I've also seen town mistake the counts. So I guess it's null.
