Mini 1454 - GAME OVER

[fuzzybutternut]

Yep yep.
problems?

[Rob14]

Vote Count #1.4:

bubbajack8:

Aj The Epic, fuzzybutternut, JKMatthews (3)

notscience:

jon_h61, Nobody Special, JuanJuan (3)

pitoli:

notscience, HookerPunch (2)

Amrun:

bubbajack8 (1)

HookerPunch:

Amrun (1)

Aj The Epic:

marcmann2 (1)

Not Voting:

pitoli, AngelInFreezer

With 13 alive, it takes 7 players to reach a lynch.

V/LA:

None

Deadline:

(expired on 2013-06-10 22:45:00)

[notscience]

Because I think he's scum?

After just 4 pages?

EBWOP- It just seems weird that you mark him as scum over leaning scum or even null and we're on page 4 with barely anything of actual sustenance.

P-edit- You going to keep saying that all game or are you going to explain yourself some, because if it's the former then this will become a LONG game.

[fuzzybutternut]

No one would take me seriously if I explained my reason for keeping my vote on him and saying he is scum.

Pretty sure he's scum though.

[notscience]

No one would take me seriously if I explained my reason for keeping my vote on him and saying he is scum.

Pretty sure he's scum though.

I can hardly take you seriously when you don't.

[HookerPunch]

Hooker, what was your previous account?

A new account would imply I am trying to have a fresh start. That said, a quick google search probably would solve your problems, I dunno.

[fuzzybutternut]

No one would take me seriously if I explained my reason for keeping my vote on him and saying he is scum.

Pretty sure he's scum though.

I can hardly take you seriously when you don't.

Bubba was my RVS vote. More times than not, my RVS vote has been scum. Therefore, imo, bubba is scum.

[JuanJuan]

No one would take me seriously if I explained my reason for keeping my vote on him and saying he is scum.

Pretty sure he's scum though.

In the event you weren't trolling before this post just now (#106), It kinda defeats the objects of having secret suspicions if you then post telling people you have suspicions you're keeping private, especially given that we're so early on. If you really do have suspicions, and this isn't just an attempt to revive the wagon, for whatever reason, surely it would've been more productive to let them keep going, so you can actually come up with some logic we can believe rather than posting what you just did.

[fuzzybutternut]

Juan, I know what I'm doing. Trust me.

[notscience]

Im not liking that last post fuzzy. It feels off to me.

VOTE: fuzzybutternut

[jon_h61]

fuzzy's playing toward other Town games I've read, he can be tenacious when he decides someone's scum. I'll have to check out a few of his scum games to be see how he plays scum. I remember once he pulled a gambit that didn't work out so well though for his scum team.

[notscience]

fuzzy's playing toward other Town games I've read, he can be tenacious when he decides someone's scum. I'll have to check out a few of his scum games to be see how he plays scum. I remember once he pulled a gambit that didn't work out so well though for his scum team.

Tenacity isn't really the reason for my vote. His comment right before felt off to me. Like he was trying to force Juan to back off and follow anything he says.

[JuanJuan]

Perhaps, but then you have vested interests in me pursuing fuzzy over this. If I back off then I'd be looking back at you, right?

[notscience]

Perhaps, but then you have vested interests in me pursuing fuzzy over this. If I back off then I'd be looking back at you, right?

wut? Can you rephrase that, I'm not understanding what you're trying to say.

[marcmann2]

Unvote

I don't like how HP is being very quick to please and would rather vote for someone who hasn't posted yet.

Vote HookerPunch

[JuanJuan]

Perhaps, but then you have vested interests in me pursuing fuzzy over this. If I back off then I'd be looking back at you, right?

wut? Can you rephrase that, I'm not understanding what you're trying to say.

Well, you inferred that fuzzy might be telling me to back off, and that it seemed scummy to you, and what I'm saying in return is that you have a vested interest in me pursuing it further as I have my vote on you.

[notscience]

Perhaps, but then you have vested interests in me pursuing fuzzy over this. If I back off then I'd be looking back at you, right?

wut? Can you rephrase that, I'm not understanding what you're trying to say.

Well, you inferred that fuzzy might be telling me to back off, and that it seemed scummy to you, and what I'm saying in return is that you have a vested interest in me pursuing it further as I have my vote on you.

My issue is, I don't like people telling others to "trust them" without providing a decent reason to. It wasn't that I had an interest in you pursuing it, nor do I pay attention to who votes me until it gets to L-2 or L-1 region. I find it scummy to TELL people to trust you. You want trust, earn it. Don't try and tell people to.

[fuzzybutternut]

fuzzy's playing toward other Town games I've read, he can be tenacious when he decides someone's scum. I'll have to check out a few of his scum games to be see how he plays scum. I remember once he pulled a gambit that didn't work out so well though for his scum team.

Let's not talk about that.

[fuzzybutternut]

fuzzy's playing toward other Town games I've read, he can be tenacious when he decides someone's scum. I'll have to check out a few of his scum games to be see how he plays scum. I remember once he pulled a gambit that didn't work out so well though for his scum team.

Tenacity isn't really the reason for my vote. His comment right before felt off to me. Like he was trying to force Juan to back off and follow anything he says.

lol. No.

[notscience]

fuzzy's playing toward other Town games I've read, he can be tenacious when he decides someone's scum. I'll have to check out a few of his scum games to be see how he plays scum. I remember once he pulled a gambit that didn't work out so well though for his scum team.

Tenacity isn't really the reason for my vote. His comment right before felt off to me. Like he was trying to force Juan to back off and follow anything he says.

lol. No.

Jeez, you love short and sweet don't you. I said how it appeared to me. Not sure how you can say "No" to how it came off to me, but do tell me.

[fuzzybutternut]

I do, actually. I'm a surface kind of guy.

It's "No" because you're wrong. I wasn't trying to force anyone to do anything. I

do

know what i'm doing.

[JuanJuan]

I do, actually. I'm a surface kind of guy.

It's "No" because you're wrong. I wasn't trying to force anyone to do anything. I

do

know what i'm doing.

---> hides reasons for pressure on bubba, 'I know what I'm doing'
---> 'I'm a surface kind of guy'

?

[fuzzybutternut]

Where the fuck did I hide my reasons?

"I think Bubba is scum." I told you, my RVS vote is usually scum. Happens all the time.

[JuanJuan]

Forgive me for thinking that a troll/joke post, along with your 'totes serious' earlier.

[fuzzybutternut]

I don't troll, and that wasn't a joke post.