[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 4978304 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 181: Everyone's being watched (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #58 (isolation #5) » Sun May 26, 2013 12:55 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
Lol "bully you." Your vote obviously isn't contributing to town, like, at all. So the fact that you insist on keeping it there means you don't want to help town.
Post
Post #64 (isolation #8) » Sun May 26, 2013 4:52 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 57, Zionite wrote:I don't condone lynching someone simply because they're lurking. I'm the only one voting Grimgroove, so to act as if I'm trying to get an easy lynch is ridiculous.
I haven't pushed a case for Grimgroove or tried to convince anyone, so how can you say I'm seeking a lynch
? But I will use my vote for pressure whenever I choose; that's why it's there. I don't like Grimgroove's response to it so I'm leaving it there. I won't let you bully me out of it.
Post
Post #76 (isolation #13) » Sun May 26, 2013 10:18 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 29, Horus wrote:fuzzybutternut: You had been posting during RVS without random-voting, then I voted for you for not voting and then yiu random-voted. Do you see value in RVS participation? If so, then why were you abstaining until I brought it up? If not, then why did you join in at my prompting?
I had one post before my RVS. Therefore, this question is invalid.
Seriously? So if someone would say "Why haven't you washed your hair?", you would not take that as a hint to wash your hair? I guess I'll be communicating very straightforwardly with your from now on.
Your last answer was pretty bad. Something along these lines would have been better:
"Indeed, I had one post before my RVS. Therefore, this question is valid. Here is my answer to it: ... "
Could you fill in the dots?
There really isn't anything to fill in. I literally had one post before my RVS vote. There is no rule stating that your first post in game HAS to be RVS.
In post 102, fuzzybutternut wrote:Well, I initially put my vote on him to pressure him and, since then, he's shown me no reason to take it off, so, yeah.
You haven't given us reason for the original vote besides pressure despite promising more details.
You haven't shown why my response to your pressure vote is reason to leave it there.
Because you all but freaked out over it. Town doesn't do that.
Post
Post #111 (isolation #19) » Tue May 28, 2013 1:20 am
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 110, Malakittens wrote:I don't really like DBK's L-1 vote. Seemed like he had a case, but never went into details about it. Which is sketchy to me.
I'd probably move my vote there if I didn't already feel as if its in a good spot.
He seems to be freaking out in my opinion.
@Fuzzy:
You seem different this game.. More activity for one and secondly giving out reads.. Is there a reason for this? Did you roll scum?
No, actually. I thought you were in the game that I explained my hatred for scum roles? *shrug*
I'm coming around to the Zionite wagon, I've been trying to work out my thoughts on him and I'm actually finding it a very arduous task to move him out of the null column one way or the other; we basically get one snippet of meaningful activity between him and I immediately outside of RVS, and after that his focus immediately narrows exclusively to trying to negotiate townreads on him.
His early content becomes crucial in reading him because almost everything afterward is focused on defense and claiming towncred, which does less to inform us of his alignment and more his personality/playstyle: It is evident that Zionite is accustomed to being able to snatch early towncred and begin to command the thread in the game's earliest stages. The fact that this strategy has so spectacularly backfired in this instance confounds him and he is now focused almost entirely on figuring out what went wrong and reclaiming the perceived towncred he feels we're denying him.
This singular focus on defense is something I would ordinarily find scummy, but I've been burned enough times by people who did this and flipped Town to be wary - his ego (as I perceive it) suggests he is a seasoned player, however, who wouldn't fall victim to such a vice as Town (his #89 provides a helpful window, informing us he does, in fact, consider one's fixation on their own wagon a scumtell), so I am left to wonder...
why did he stop scumhunting once he became a suspect?
I like this wagon, but I'm wary because I've heard a lot of quiet agreement that fuzzybutternut is suspicious, but there's been no movement on that front - which is rather odd.
You'll come to realize sooner or later that the way I play this game is completely different from anyone else. That being said, you'll get used to this....
or you won't. Doesn't matter to me.
Post
Post #164 (isolation #22) » Tue May 28, 2013 6:00 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 160, Zionite wrote:I'll case Fuzzy when you're done with whatever this is.
Does that make me scum? Your original argument somehow concludes that it does but I don't follow.
Some things can't be defended, and you're really good at pushing those rhetorical arguments. But when you pull it apart and look at the pieces it's easier to tell where it is flawed. This is a good interaction though; I think it's safe to say we're not scum buddies.
If I was one of your top suspects, you'd already have been on my case and you wouldn't have left my case unless you had a reason.
Post
Post #177 (isolation #24) » Tue May 28, 2013 7:45 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 176, Horus wrote:fuzzybutternut: Everyone plays this game differently from everyone else, I don't see how this observation was especially relevant to the statement you were responding to.
Yes, that's true; however, most people adopt things from other people as they play. I don't.
Funny. DBK admits he was wrong in a post and he becomes a town read for it. I do the same thing and I'm a mild scum read.. Does it make sense? Nope.
My first vote was RVS.. You didn't have a problem with my second vote, but now apparently you bring that up. My third vote was an accidental misunderstanding which pinged a scum radar enough to warrant a vote.
Funny how you immediately try to defend yourself when I say that you are
Funny. DBK admits he was wrong in a post and he becomes a town read for it. I do the same thing and I'm a mild scum read.. Does it make sense? Nope.
My first vote was RVS.. You didn't have a problem with my second vote, but now apparently you bring that up. My third vote was an accidental misunderstanding which pinged a scum radar enough to warrant a vote.
Funny how you immediately try to defend yourself when I say that you are
probable
scum. Town doesn't do that.
Word of advice. Town
does
do that. I'm calling out for your illogical mindset. You stated you had a town read on one player, but instead of giving a slight town read to another player.. You put them as probable scum. The fact you're not applying the same thing to two different people is rather odd.
Again, if you had a problem with my vote the first time around.. Why didn't you call it out then? Why did you wait until now to do so?
Mild scum read to me is the same as probable scum. Mild you aren't really feeling up to vote for them, but they are pinging a radar.
____
@Mara:
Do we even
have
a completed town game together? I know I was town during HB, but I was also in a hydra so that's not really the correct way to 'research'.
You're placing a 'jumpy' tell with only half a meta read.
No, probable scum means that I find it very likely you could be scum. If I thought you were scum, I'd vote you; however, I don't think you are at this particular moment. The only reason I mentioned that you were probable scum is because you displayed behavior that I found more scummy than anything else.
Post
Post #312 (isolation #36) » Thu May 30, 2013 3:23 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 310, Malakittens wrote:You are missing my whole point. If you thought my vote was oppurnist why didn't you call it out prior? Why did you wait until people are looking in my direction before pointing it out?
I didn't. I was asked about you, and I answered. I didn't even notice your vote until I ISO'd you.
Post
Post #348 (isolation #38) » Thu May 30, 2013 7:16 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 335, RachMarie wrote:umm Fuzzy mine is way out of date too, but got anything else to say? like something relevant to the game at hand?
What do you think of Zio's case on you?
What do you think of how Wis has been defending you?
That is relevant, what with all the meta talk going on.
Zio's case on me is shit. I have no reason to sit here and argue against it, because it's a scum-drawn wagon. Nothing I say is going to make scum change their minds that they want to lynch me. Look elsewhere if you're not scum.
In post 335, RachMarie wrote:umm Fuzzy mine is way out of date too, but got anything else to say? like something relevant to the game at hand?
What do you think of Zio's case on you?
What do you think of how Wis has been defending you?
That is relevant, what with all the meta talk going on.
Zio's case on me is shit. I have no reason to sit here and argue against it, because it's a scum-drawn wagon. Nothing I say is going to make scum change their minds that they want to lynch me. Look elsewhere if you're not scum.
Show me how it's shit; it should be easy for you if that's true. If you're town ignoring a case against you, then you're doing the town a disservice by letting us focus on you instead of scum. It's terrible play or scummy as hell, take your pick.
You don't know my alignment unless you're scum. So if you're town, there's the possibility you're WRONG *gasp* and I could change my mind.
Why aren't you using this as an opportunity to show how I'm scum? My case should be laden with misreps and assumptions if I'm scum.
In post 288, Wisdom wrote:fuzzy, remind me what your case on Zionite is.
Iso me.
I see no case there.
Wanna vote Rach instead?
That's the problem. There is no case from Fuzzy. And there continues to be no case even in the face of a wealth of content.
LOL. It's towns prerogative as to who they want to focus on. I've already stated that my wagon is scum-drawn. If they want to continue to look my way, so be it.
I did make a case against you. It wasn't a big case, but it was enough to put you as scum imo.
Post
Post #365 (isolation #43) » Fri May 31, 2013 10:10 am
Postby fuzzybutternut »
I'm not asking for support on it.
Say I made a good case about him. If he's scum, yeah, that's great and all, but it's day one, and it leaves his partner open to go "oh, hey, I can't save him without outting myself. Oh wells"
If he's town, both scum could go "you know, that's a really good point. I like that case"
No, i'm not doing that. I've stated that I found him scummy. My vote is on him. That's where it's going to stay until I see something scummy somewhere else.
Post
Post #378 (isolation #48) » Fri May 31, 2013 1:08 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
Who's to say I'm not looking on your wagon? I don't openly announce everything I'm going to do. That makes it easy for scum to figure me out. I don't like that, therefore I choose a reclusive playing style. While it might not be hard to do, it is rather suicidal for me to do.
Post
Post #385 (isolation #49) » Fri May 31, 2013 1:20 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
In post 379, Zionite wrote:If you're a PR, this is the wrong way to play it.
So you're planning on looking at my wagon but haven't yet? Why is planning to look at it so threatening to the scum team? And so what if your reads are public? It makes it easier for TOWN to figure you out too, and even better if you get NK'd and we have something to go on in your name.
Look, don't tell me how to play this game. I know what i'm doing and I don't take kindly to being told what to do or how to do it.
Considering I don't know who's town and who isn't, I don't want anyone figuring me out right now. That leads to sheeping, and I don't want that.
Post
Post #393 (isolation #52) » Fri May 31, 2013 1:52 pm
Postby fuzzybutternut »
It's exactly how wisdom said, Zio. Scum will sheep the popular reads. Say I make a case. A brilliant case that cannot be refuted. The rest of town jumps on it. "Yeah! He's right! How could we have overlooked that!." Scum will sheep that read, whether said person is scum or not. Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
In post 449, RachMarie wrote:umm its incorrect because I am Town not scumz, but it is a good case because it shows he is trying to scum hunt not just go for me cause I tend to be an easy lynch.
Maybe you're an easy lynch because you never address anything critical about your play. I don't know if you're town or scum, so simply stating you're town doesn't help anyone. It's more productive and persuasive to break down where my case fails (and it would fail if you were actually town).
In post 451, fuzzybutternut wrote:at the same time, though, wouldn't that be near suicidal to do as scum?