Open 509: Friends and Enemies (Game Over)

[chesskid3]

you're cute when you're mad

[Ellibereth]

http://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist.p ... le&u=13931


lol
he loses

next on line

Unvote, Vote Nicol

P.S.
for the blind
look at date last visited
and date of his last post here

[Ellibereth]

Will you please cut the crap, you know how to make thoughtful posts. I am getting incredibly tired of these types of replies and your "lolu" and use of non-words like "wut". Prime examples of your ability to present thought out information:

wut
he had 2 days
statement totes true

and chesskid IS a mason so lolu

[Nani]

Wow Nani, lynching someone from the bottom half? Seriously?

That's the most shortsighted idea I have ever heard. Quantity over quality.

So if someone from the bottom half now posts 30 meaningless posts, he's off your list then?

I like my vote.

As I said to Whiskers, players I've suspected all the game are players that have not scumhunted at all and spent D1 posting excuses and such. Funny thing is that the majority if not all of them are on the bottom half list. There is nothing new on my "lynch from the bottom half" proposal here. And no, it's not shortsighted. It's better than "upgrading my rvs vote" from Thomas or not even voting from Bolas, or "I agree with Elli" from innocent, or "Vote: Nicol Bolas" with no reason attached from BS2000.

You insult me if you think I would call someone town from posting 30 meaningless posts after being called a lurker.

I agree: quantity over quality. But, I'm curious Gnomeo. Who of the bottom list can be considered a "quantity not quality" poster?

[Nani]

Mod, plz votecount.

With one day to deadline, it's time to get some wagons.

[Ellibereth]

kinda sad

TOWN
Elli
chesskid
Mantis
Confid
ella
BS
nani

PEOPLE LEFT
Gnomeo
innocentvillager
NicCage
NicolBolas
Thomas
Whiskers

this list still stands

Whiskers prolly (a lot?) more town

and that reminds
where the fuck is thomas

[Ellibereth]

r.e. sad given the minimalistic amount of changes in it vs. the time passed

[Ellibereth]

and maybe moving confid off town.
yeah I'd prolly switch whiskers and confid

[Nani]

I think Whiskers is annoying and an arrogant ponyfuck but I agree he is more town than what not.

I'm curious? Why BS and Confidanon on your town list?

[Whiskers]

Could you stop misrepping people? "Why did you not take into account the fact that they could be scum", is

you

putting words in someone else's mouth,

you

"assuming things you could impossibly have no idea". Hypocrite.

It's called asking for a reson, you IDIOT. The rule is simple: Do not answer questions that are not directed to you.

You were asking, "when did you stop beating your wife?"
Unless you're trying to trick another player into saying something scummy, instead of asking for info, I gave you the answer you required. If it

was

a trick, then you're scummy.

I did not "stupidly assume." I asked for a reason, that is the reason you told me. I stupidly believed your answer-- now you're telling me your answers aren't good enough for you. Good to know. It's scummy, why?

Reads are not static. You should go back to junior high if you think that reads do not evolve as more information is offered.

Yes, reads are not static. But I asked you why you were voting Thomas, you gave me an answer, and then threw a bitch-fit when I cited that reason later.

It's scummy because:
Who would you prefer lynching?
A: has scum suspects and has 31 posts.
B: his only scum suspect is his rvs vote and has 11 posts, 6 of them are rvs related.

It's scummy because you copy+pasted a question from earlier?
Who I prefer to lynch is not solely dependent on activity. If A is really scummy and B isn't, I'd want to lynch A.

So... "lynch a lurker" is really your best idea?
I mean, yeah, ok. It's Day 1, so maybe it

is

the best idea. But for someone who has had scumreads and supported other people with scumreads, suddenly turning around to say, "OH WAIT LETS LYNCH A LURKER" is pretty suspic.

How am I suddenly turning around when my scumreads are precisely lurkers who do not have stances, you ponyfuck?: Thomas, innocent, Bolas, BS2000. Do you even think?

Innocent has stances. But for all this talk of how many

reasons

you have, and how I'm such an

idiot

for mentioning your desired policy lynch, you sure seem to be reaching deep-- really, really deep-- to reasons to lynch, er, any lurker.
And you for got an "-er"

[Whiskers]

I don't like this post (and the others that say the same thing); "I have a scumread, guess why" is really really scummy. When asked, explain, or explain that you're not going to. I will not explain your read for you-- it tells me you didn't really have one to begin with, and are looking for me to give you the answer.
ALSO: Her attack on ellabelle was "I like her ISO, it's full of nothing", on page four. Is Nani going to turn out to be a one trick pony?

dude
http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 4&sr=posts
plz tell me how that doesn't scream scum

It does. Good point.

So Elibereth's trick somehow works but mine doesn't? Fucking hypocrite.

Lol, did you forget to respond to the first one? Or did you just have nothing to say?
And, it's not a "trick". Elibereth pointed out something scummy that someone was doing. YOU, on the other hoof, pointed out that "WAH, WAH, SOME PEOPLE AREN'T POSTING ENOUGH!" So don't you "fucking hypocrite" me.

So, this is interesting, because while Nani is here denying that she wanted to lynch him (or at least

suggesting

that she didn't), she now tells me she wanted to lynch him all this time. This also puts me off, because it seemed like she had a reason to lynch him ("seriously just read his ISO,") but then turns around and acts like she didn't want to lynch him at all; it's all for pressure.

It started with pressure. It is now on "player with no reads". Simple. No need to post a lot of shit to make a fake point.

It's illogical you want to lynch me over the pile of useless lurkers in this game. And scummy as fuck. Who is the scumbag lurker you are trying to save here?

If that was your reason, why didn't you say that one of the many many many many many times I pointed out that there was only one reason to lynch Thomas given. When I was hounding you about your "I don't necessarily want to lynch Thomas" vote?
Better, I believe you didn't have a reason to begin with, and were just joining a wagon because that's what's popular. If you're town, I'd say you have confirmation bias, and stayed on the wagon until you could fuck together a weakass excuse, a single reason to keep voting him. If you're scum, I'd say the bit about "not necessarily desiring to lynch the person I'm voting" is your attempt at not taking any responsibility when a mislynch wagon gets pushed through.

"It's illogical" is bullshit that scum say when they think they've covered their tracks and someone is attacking them for something they think is a crappy reason, especially when there are, in their minds, much better lynch candidates available. I know, I've done this.

No need to post a lot of shit to make a fake point.

What is this referring to? Aren't you (

now

) voting Thomas for

NOT

making any points, fake or otherwise? Does this pertain to the conversation we were having at all? How?

[Whiskers]

That's the most shortsighted idea I have ever heard. Quantity over quality.

I agree: quantity over quality. But, I'm curious Gnomeo. Who of the bottom list can be considered a "quantity not quality" poster?

Uuuuhh.... I

think

you just misread this part...
You do know that "Quantity" means "lots and lots" whereas "Quality" means "very good", right?

Gnomeo is calling you shortsighted because you are saying LOTS AND LOTS of posts is better than VERY GOOD posts. I think that's a bit of a misrepresentation, maybe a slight exaggeration, but...

"I agree: quantity over quality!"
You agree that it's better to have lots and lots of posts, than to have very good posts?
Or did you just misread it?

[Whiskers]

I'm not leaning as far scum on Nani anymore, they are coming up with useful dialogue, looking to genuinely figure out what is what.

No, man, she's not. She's been on Thomas since the wagon got popular-- vote sitting nicely in the middle iirc, where scum like to be.

[Whiskers]

I think Whiskers is annoying and an arrogant ponyfuck but I agree he is more town than what not.

Spoiler: ponyfucker

[Mantisdreamz]

prod received

i'll catch up in a bit

[Plessiez]

Vote Count 1.11

It's day 1. Deadline for the day is

18th July, 3:20 EST

. That's

(expired on 2013-07-18 03:20:27)

.

13 players remain: BS2000, chesskid3, ConfidAnon, ellabelle, Ellibereth, Gnomeo, innocentvillager, Mantisdreamz, Nani, NicCage, NicolBolas, Thomas, Whiskers

NicolBolas

[4 votes] (ellabelle, BS2000, NicCage, Ellibereth)

NicCage

[2 votes] (chesskid3, innocentvillager)

Nani

[2 votes] (Gnomeo, Whiskers)

Thomas

[2 votes] (ConfidAnon, Nani)

innocentvillager

[1 vote] (Thomas)

2 players are not voting

: {Mantisdreamz, NicolBolas}

With

13

alive it takes

7

votes to lynch somebody or to go to night.

[NicolBolas]

Welp.

[NicolBolas]

Sorry will catchup and post stuff tomorrow.

[chesskid3]

Unvote

vote: nicol

CHOO

[BS2000]

Can we agree on some wagons? Nicol and who? Let's narrow this down.

[NicolBolas]

Sorry, but i have to replace out of this game. My other head has informed me that he won't be able to post, so I'm in too many games now.

MOD, Replace me

Also, dont lynch my slot plz. I'm town, sorry for not being able to show it......

[Plessiez]

Looking for a replacement for NicolBolas...

[Plessiez]

talah replaces NicolBolas.

Because of the replacement, the deadline will be extended by

48 hours

.

The new deadline for the end of the day is

20th July, 3:20 EST

. That's (expired on 2013-07-20 03:20:27)

.

[talah]

Catching up shortly, hai gaiz!

Will check out the latest bus and jumps etc,

So we have polarisation? If you had to give your top scum and town reads, who would that be?

[talah]

Page 1-4 MLPony seems scum due to overexplanation.. Continuing