Eddie was scumbuddies with Varsoon in a game that ended recently.In post 398, Titus wrote:??? What's this about?
So he should know better.
Eddie was scumbuddies with Varsoon in a game that ended recently.In post 398, Titus wrote:??? What's this about?
So he should know that this isn't Varsoon's usual scum play?In post 400, BROseidon wrote:Eddie was scumbuddies with Varsoon in a game that ended recently.In post 398, Titus wrote:??? What's this about?
So he should know better.
Please answer why for each of these.In post 391, EddieFenix wrote:Titus - Town
Rift Adrift - Town
Zoidberg - Town
Slandaar - Town/Null
Brosiden - Town/Null
Amrun - Town/Null
Ghost - Null
elvis - Null
Oriole - Null
PeregrineV - Null
AA9 - Null
StubbsKVM - Null
Baezu - Null
R. Wolf - Null/Scum
Rofl - Scum
Jabarkas Mayonnaise (hydra) - Scum
TD - town/null/scum? (My brain right now... Fuckin hurts worse from reading... Damn Pg.14...)
If this game moves at 16 pages again in a matter of 12 hrs before I can read it, I will flip/cut bitches.
I just meant that as suspicions were stated and people were voted.
Uh, no, because three scum in this amount of players is almost sure not to be true.In post 410, StubbsKVM wrote:I have played a game where there where 2 scum who knew each other, and a third "traitor" who was unknown. If the traitor was targeted by the other 2 for the nightkill, he was recruited and confirmed as mafia without dying.
Do you think this could be similar?
Traitors are always aligned with scum.In post 413, StubbsKVM wrote:Well, I'm just trying o figure out the shooting and not dying part.
This "traitor" was always mafia aligned though, so not sure Why they called it that.
P-edit: hmm
lolIn post 213, Amrun wrote:Where is your fire and brimstone, Slandaar?
In post 214, Rift Adrift wrote: Why the unvote, Slandaar?
The guy just made a big revelation. What I was thinking was wrong. It was late thus 'will look at this tomorrow'In post 198, Slandaar wrote:UghIn post 184, Titus wrote: My vote on oriole was RVS, thus not reasonless like I defined. Third and forth votes are not random and thus need a reason to be done.
So, you just have literally no clue what RVS is, I will reread this tomorrow I need to relook at stuff; RVS does not mean pure random. 3rd and 4th are (probably) not random by definition of the word random but they don't mean the people making them want a lynch either, however, by making wagons you get more information from pressure and reactions than everyone voting purely at random because that accomplishes exactly nothing.
For example, what did your vote do? exactly; nothing. /lesson.
Show me where one of your random votes achieved something.In post 200, Titus wrote:However, my votes seem to get the game going and scum are likely thinking easy mislynch. Well, not this game. Scum will pay if y'all lynch me. I'm not afraid. Bring it on.
Translation: I want to get on this wagon, but I don't have a case, so can somebody make this easy for me to sheep this wagon.In post 201, Jabarkas Mayonnaise wrote:Can one of you fine gentlemen be a dear and lay out the case on Titus for Jabarkas?
I'm not quite seeing it as compelling that this moment, and I'd hate for you all to have a ball and for me to miss out it.
-V
O RLYIn post 245, Rift Adrift wrote:Slandaar's unvote worries us. Titus is being a scumfuck and Slandaar is like one of MS's top tier tunnellers. What do you think?
I find this appeal to emotion very unconvincing given that jabarkus has been calling everybody shitlords.In post 234, Jabarkas Mayonnaise wrote:Rift and Amrun, you're making this game less fun to play. If you continue to punish creativity, an open atmosphere, and forward-thought, I'm going to make a pretty good case to have you both removed from the game. It's not fun to play with you when half of your posts are cynical, not related to the game, and largely insulting other players.
In post 220, Jabarkas Mayonnaise wrote:@Rift: Jabarkas don't think you understand what you're talking about.
Furthermore, being a shitlord isn't relevant to the game. Please play the game.
-V
In post 224, Jabarkas Mayonnaise wrote:@Amrun: Jabarkas do not know your case intimately. You do. Post it.
Jabarkas is being as transparent as possible.
Post your case. Concise-like.
Otherwise, Jabarkas does not care for Titus lynch.
Wagon full of shitlords.
@Stubbs: Where are you referring?
-V
Post 184.In post 417, StubbsKVM wrote:Titus, you didn't give me your reason to vote for oriole.
That's obviously why I wanted him to show some cogitation on the subject.In post 419, elvis_knits wrote:Around page 9-10...
Jabarkus and Amrun are being pissy.
Jabarkus: what is your case on titus?
Amrun: read my posts
Jabarks: NO U
Amrun: NO U
...X infinity
O RLYIn post 245, Rift Adrift wrote:Slandaar's unvote worries us. Titus is being a scumfuck and Slandaar is like one of MS's top tier tunnellers. What do you think?
RVS is a method of getting the game going. My vote in this game tells me Stubbs isn't reading with any sort of eye for detail.In post 416, Slandaar wrote:Show me where one of your random votes achieved something.In post 200, Titus wrote:However, my votes seem to get the game going and scum are likely thinking easy mislynch. Well, not this game. Scum will pay if y'all lynch me. I'm not afraid. Bring it on.