In post 231, sangres wrote:As of our most recent convo, yes it is. When we were talking about you prior to Nacho posting, I had a slight town read though with the tiny bit of experiential meta I have with you (the short time you were in the Vengeball game)
Bullshit. There's no way you could infer anything at all from my play in Vengeball or from my early play here, much less that I'm town somehow.
Then you started jumping from post to post, essentially calling each post "scummy because Sangres is scum" even though the data in the thread already in some cases directly contradicted your statements
How come I've never heard about these "contradictions" yet? Shouldn't you be telling us about them?
, and perhaps even more hilarious, you constructed a scum motivation for us, "focus on one player", which is anti-scum behavior. Scum need to control and misdirect on the large canvas. I, fferyllt, might have such piss-poor scum strategy on my own. Nacho? Nah.
lolno. Surely it depends on the player playing scum, but it's a very common scum strategy to tunnel on a specific player, usually someone no1 else suspects, and ignore the rest of the game. That's exactly what you're doing, and it's not like Nacho to do that as town. As scum however he did exactly that in the one game I've seen him playing scum.
