Micro 213 - Scumhunter's Speed [GAME OVER]

[Lucky2u]

Well I'm already voting Maki, but I will say Xegarus makes me feel more comfortable with it.

[Fifty Ways]

I'm afraid your case just reminded me why I'm not voting maki.

Being overly self-conscious is just a tic of his.

[Xegarus]

I'm afraid your case just reminded me why I'm not voting maki.

Being overly self-conscious is just a tic of his.

It wasnt in the last game i played with him.
But fine, fuck the self conciousness.
What about the mass amounts of no scum hunting mixed together with his opportunistic reasoning for his vote?
He didnt mention Samuel once.
NOT EVEN ONCE.
Yet his vote has been on him for practically the whole game. Heck, he hasnt even said anything about him still. Just EXACTLY what i said, but less.

[Bertkerberos]

I'm afraid your case just reminded me why I'm not voting maki.

Being overly self-conscious is just a tic of his.

Nacho says Maki's paranoia makes him town as fuck

[Xegarus]

I'm afraid your case just reminded me why I'm not voting maki.

Being overly self-conscious is just a tic of his.

Nacho says Maki's paranoia makes him town as fuck

Bullshit, hes already played the WIFOMy as fuck "but why would i give my advantage away as scum" card. Along with the equally shit "if im scum, lynch me". That is not paranoia, that looks alot more like certainty.

[Lucky2u]

I'm afraid your case just reminded me why I'm not voting maki.

Being overly self-conscious is just a tic of his.

Just to be clear. You are saying that as a tic of his, the self conscious is a null factor and not a town point in his favor right?

[Makiavel]

Even if my vote wasn't valid at post 54, it doesn't mean I HAVE TO RETRACT IT AT ALL costs, if I feel it's right later on, I let it there, that's as easy as that.

[Makiavel]

+ i didn't know that agreeing with someone is being scum, i fail to see the reasoning there. Also it's essentially what made you lose the other game, you overanalyse things, then sometimes you neglect some important details. You're especially easy to deal with simply by buddying you a little bit. If I wanted to exploit you, I'd have done it, I find no reason to however, since I've basically nothing to hide.

[Fifty Ways]

oh maki,
ur so idiosyncratic

[Makiavel]

oh maki,
ur so idiosyncratic

the fuck does that mean

[Xegarus]

Even if my vote wasn't valid at post 54

Then why did you make its?

it doesn't mean I HAVE TO RETRACT IT AT ALL costs

No one said you did.

if I feel it's right later on, I let it there, that's as easy as that.

You didnt give us any reason as to why it was right later on. Probably because you didnt have one. Like i have said so many times now, you didnt even mention Samuel at all.

i didn't know that agreeing with someone is being scum

Did i say that?
I'm pretty sure i said theres a differences between agreeing with someone and just conveniently using their reasons.

i fail to see the reasoning there

Oh yes, you indeed do.

Also it's essentially what made you lose the other game, you overanalyse things, then sometimes you neglect some important details. You're especially easy to deal with simply by buddying you a little bit. If I wanted to exploit you, I'd have done it, I find no reason to however, since I've basically nothing to hide.

Blablablabla.
I like how everything you just said was relevant to this game.....oh wait, it wasnt.
Deflect much?


Like i said before.
Reads, now.

[Makiavel]

It is related to the game because you're failing the same way as you were in the other game.

My vote @54 was based on the context back then of the 2 day mafia talk, where Bert asked me to follow him and as there were no lead before, I decided to go along.

IF I AGREE with your reasons, I don't think I have to mention them again just so everybody can see them again, and just in case, I told them to look at his iso. But hey, welcome to the paranoia group, I'm the group leader.

Yep, I indeed do fail to see what logic there is in the bad reasoning you now provide, sorry. While I can relate to your reasons as to why to vote Samuel, I can't relate to how stupid you're being when it comes to analyzing me.

Peace'.

[Xegarus]

It is related to the game because you're failing the same way as you were in the other game.

Was that a scum slip? How do you know if i'm failing? If i'm failing that means i'm town to you. Since you have ignored my request at reads i'm assuming you dont have any. Thus you know who's what.

My vote @54 was based on the context back then of the 2 day mafia talk, where Bert asked me to follow him and as there were no lead before, I decided to go along.

I concede. You did just sheep Bert.
But there are two problems i have with this.
1. You have kept your vote on him throughout the entire game.
2. You have not done anything at all to help us find scum. So you must have been as clueless as you were when you sheeped.

IF I AGREE with your reasons, I don't think I have to mention them again just so everybody can see them again, and just in case, I told them to look at his iso.

You simply told them to iso him. Didnt point any part of it out, didnt mention anything at all about him. Just a simple "check his iso" which is so extraordinarily broad statement.

Yep, I indeed do fail to see what logic there is in the bad reasoning you now provide, sorry. While I can relate to your reasons as to why to vote Samuel, I can't relate to how stupid you're being when it comes to analyzing me.

How can you not understand that
1. You have done nothing.
2. You WIFOM'd
3. Made a shitty "if im scum, lynch me" which has no town motive at all.
4. Have been extremely opportunistic on your vote and its reasoning.
5. Deflected by attacking my play on a previous game rather than say anything about the points against you.

[Xegarus]

and
6. Haven't given me the read i asked you for.

[Makiavel]

Want reads ? ok

Nacho has swag, that's my first read.
Bert is a very legit straightforward person, He's a gut feeling person he says, same as me. WE'RE BRO HOES.
Xeg is a noob.

anyway, seriously, I'm bad at reads but w/e

Nacho seems town, however Bert is null, he bases himself too much on gut and gets overexcited very quickly, it doesn't make him look very good, so far he's town though.

JK is scummish, the whole arguing with Fifty while keeping a vote on Bert for reasons he has yet to explain sure doesn't look good. He said he'd explain why his vote was there, but he failed to do so in my opinion.

Lucky's scum , "I'm usually the most scummiest player in a game" looks like he's trying to give himself a reason for looking scummy and making mistakes, votes on me at #67 with as a reason "that wouldn't be a bad place to start" which is no valid reason. Also the only thing I had done before was sheeping Bert & delay the game, which was THE SAME THING he did. Therefore no valid reason to vote if you were in his mind. He has yet to give reasons and relies on others to justify his choice, kind of following people & taking opportunities I'd say.

Fifty's the most active person and most likely to be town in my opinion also he's keeping the game alive, which is good. A bit too much of defending me for something that happened in another game so it might make him look scum if you believe I am. I can assure you that I'm not and unless he wants to buddy me (which wouldn't really make much sense, it puts him in the spotlight), then he's town.

Xeg, you're not looking scum, you're mostly null, however your reasoning lacks and while I believe you're most likely looking town, you cause the village to fail, that's about all I've got to say 'bout you.

Kcdas : Null, leaning scum. Only reason I don't call him scum is the fact he gave no reason as to why he votes people. Calls his vote on me a RVS, then says he's up to lynch me 130%, never mentionned ONE reason about it.

Samuel : same as Kcdas.

Anyway, my case's stronger for Lucky, and since I don't want villagers to lose me, I'll VOTE: Lucky, thnk u

[Kcdaspot]

Anyway, my case's stronger for Lucky, and

since I don't want villagers to lose me

, I'll VOTE: Lucky, thnk u

everyone

get the fuck

on this wagon.

right the hell now.

[Makiavel]

isn't it fucking normal for a townie to not want to die ? or well I guess even scum doesn't want to die.

[Makiavel]

and IF you fucking look at the game (which you've never done & have been lurking all game), you'd see that u, JK & lucky aswell are the luckliest to be scum

[Kcdaspot]

isn't it fucking normal for a townie to not want to die ? or well I guess even scum doesn't want to die.

Scum DOESNT want to die..

a VT does in a certain situation.

in this case its okay if a townie dies cuz of the setup. either way a scum is going to die.

the scum DOESNT WANT to die because of WHITE FLAG

there is not that big of repercussion for town to die but scum? its a matter of life or death.

one thing im not clear on in this setup:

MOD

Will the scum faction have a nk on night 2 either way?

[Bertkerberos]

Will the scum faction have a nk on night 2 either way?

I'm pretty sure the game becomes nightless after N1, so no more scum faction NK's??

[Bertkerberos]

Now, last I counted, Lucky is at lynch -1.

Someone HAMMER the scumbag please!

[Kcdaspot]

y?

tempt me

tease me

please me

[Bertkerberos]

DO IT CUZ IT'S GOOD FOR YA

- Bert

Nacho hasn't been here today but I have been here and lay down the hamma brotha

THE BALL IS IN YOUR HANDS

[Kcdaspot]

that attempt makes me sad...

nope.

[Kcdaspot]

yah this iso of his p. bad

but why him over maka

thats what i wanna know