NSin (1) - goodmorning
goodmorning (1) - TwinFlames
SafetyDance (1) - zMuffinMan
Not Voting: SafetyDance, Gollum alienBRO, DeathNote, ToastyToast
Five to lynch
(expired on 2013-09-01 11:50:44)
I think its very possible that Toast could be scum. Our problem is that we don't particularly like any of the reaming slots. We had thought that Mattel was active lurking and GoodMorning is dumb to get rid of the ring. Both TwinFlames and AlienBro are hardcore lurking. The Bro head thinking that we have 5 scum in a 15 player game seems stupid and his earlier "yea why is there a second killer?" when that shit was obvious seems like scum playing dumb. We hate the sateydance slot. MA was active lurking as well. The question is would Moz really try and save his buddy the way he did? Its not something we are willing to risk.In post 2352, zMuffinMan wrote:@gollum,
Do you actually think Toast is scum? If so, why aren't you voting him?
And what are your thoughts on goodmorning and safetydance's slot
Except that's the same questions I've been trying to find answers to and have been met with negative reactions from everyone else.In post 2344, goodmorning wrote:I, too, am a tad confused. Why haven't you been reading my posts, or indeed the game in general? Most of the start of today was literally discussion about what you have just asked.In post 2343, Twin Flames wrote:I am a tad confused here on something, If Who had the ring, and Nsin hammered, then how would gm get the ring to destroy it? Could someone explain that?
And then you vote me without having read my posts, or indeed the game in general. Which is not the behaviour one would normally see from someone claiming to be Town.
Congrats on an utter failure of an ability to read.
Not a Massclaim but a flavor claim. There is a
We hate you too.In post 2356, Gollum wrote:I think its very possible that Toast could be scum. Our problem is that we don't particularly like any of the reaming slots. We had thought that Mattel was active lurking and GoodMorning is dumb to get rid of the ring. Both TwinFlames and AlienBro are hardcore lurking. The Bro head thinking that we have 5 scum in a 15 player game seems stupid and his earlier "yea why is there a second killer?" when that shit was obvious seems like scum playing dumb. We hate the sateydance slot. MA was active lurking as well. The question is would Moz really try and save his buddy the way he did? Its not something we are willing to risk.In post 2352, zMuffinMan wrote:@gollum,
Do you actually think Toast is scum? If so, why aren't you voting him?
And what are your thoughts on goodmorning and safetydance's slot
vote:safetydance
Well the simple answer is he received the ring some time D2, unaware of how he got it (perhaps it was from a town player still alive) he pretended to have investigated subliminal, thinking he could destroy the ring after this and coast to endgame with the whole, "i investigated subliminal i can't be scum!" thing...bro wrote:I don't see mafia motivation in what he did yesterday
Why Gollum? He looks pretty town, given the interactions with the rest of the flipped wraith-scum. Not to mention he's one of the only players who seems to give a shit about scum hunting at this point.bro wrote:the last mafioso is in {Gollum, Toasty, TF}
This part seemed rather odd to me too, but I can't rationalise him doing it as town, either. I'm looking at it from the perspective that he didn't fully understand the ring mechanic and that goodmorning was claiming a cop guilty. From this perspective, he makes sense as scum.gollum wrote:The question is would Moz really try and save his buddy the way he did?
In post 2342, zMuffinMan wrote:Well, yeah, seeing as you replaced in this day phase, I can't exactly make much of a case on your posts alone. I will say you've been doing a lot of talking about the setup and stuff and not much work into actually finding scum, so that's not exactly a positive for you, either.safetydance wrote:So that's it? I can't really defend any of that, which is convenient.
You both address similar points so there's no point having two replies. What do you guys have against me having all the information about the setup and what has happened that you guys currently have now? Because that is all that I am trying to attain.In post 2345, ToastyToast wrote:@SafetyDance: I dislike that you want a massclaim on D4.There was also your 4 posts in a row that just seemed kind of unecessary and like you were talking just so you could say something.
Two people not three.In post 2357, ToastyToast wrote:yeah the three people who have been in safetydance have all been ridiculously lurky. I seriously had to go back to figure out if they had even posted once.
I don't see any negative reactions from this.safetydance wrote:Except that's the same questions I've been trying to find answers to and have been met with negative reactions from everyone else.
No, not really. They are basically the same thing in this game, minus the fact that you can't guess the exact PRs from flavour.safetydance wrote:Not a Massclaim but a flavor claim. There is a subtle difference.
Nothing. But that's all you seem to be doing and I'd prefer seeing your thoughts on different players than have you speculate about the ring / ask about claims 20 posts in a row.safetydance wrote:What do you guys have against me having all the information about the setup and what has happened that you guys currently have now?
If that's what we were doing then we'd agree.In post 2360, SafetyDance wrote: As for you're alignment, bandwagoning cheaply with no actual reason is definitely scummy.
So if you think GM is scum for her actions then why are you not wanting to lynch her? That seems counter-intuitive.In post 2361, zMuffinMan wrote:Well the simple answer is he received the ring some time D2, unaware of how he got it (perhaps it was from a town player still alive) he pretended to have investigated subliminal, thinking he could destroy the ring after this and coast to endgame with the whole, "i investigated subliminal i can't be scum!" thing...bro wrote:I don't see mafia motivation in what he did yesterday
I am assuming he didn't think this through properly (he obviously didn't, regardless of alignment) and didn't expect to be criticised for this.
Why Gollum? He looks pretty town, given the interactions with the rest of the flipped wraith-scum. Not to mention he's one of the only players who seems to give a shit about scum hunting at this point.[/quote]bro wrote:the last mafioso is in {Gollum, Toasty, TF}
It was a hypothetical. BRO said he couldn't see the wraith-scum motivation, I explained the possibility I was considering where gm was actually wraith-scum.safetydance wrote:So if you think GM is scum for her actions then why are you not wanting to lynch her? That seems counter-intuitive.
It's more to do with the fact that he did it after third party died. I'm going to assume third party needs to be alive to win.safetydance wrote:The act of destroying the ring is very town. You realise that we can't win without it being destroyed?
Well, that's not actually what he was doing. I understood that he had his own reasons for wanting a massclaim and didn't want to disclose those reasons, and gm prying about this was just dumb.safetydance wrote:No he hasn't, he's just been reacting negatively to everyone and insulting them. You call that scumhunting?
I don't know how being voted for and being accused as scum can be any more negative in this game.In post 2364, zMuffinMan wrote:I don't see any negative reactions from this.safetydance wrote:Except that's the same questions I've been trying to find answers to and have been met with negative reactions from everyone else.
Most of the negative feelings towards your slot come from the fact that your predecessors looked scummy (or less town than others), and you haven't exactly done much to change this.
No, they're not.In post 2364, zMuffinMan wrote:No, not really. They are basically the same thing in this game, minus the fact that you can't guess the exact PRs from flavour.safetydance wrote:Not a Massclaim but a flavor claim. There is a subtle difference.
Nothing. But that's all you seem to be doing and I'd prefer seeing your thoughts on different players than have you speculate about the ring / ask about claims 20 posts in a row.safetydance wrote:What do you guys have against me having all the information about the setup and what has happened that you guys currently have now?
It's the other way around. You're being accused for not doing a lot.safetydance wrote:I can't really do a lot when I'm being accused.
Not really, you have 20 posts, it's happened 20 posts in a row.safetydance wrote:Well if I am asking 20 posts in a row (that was a terrible exaggeration on your part btw)
*shrug* I don't see how you hope to form reads without having at least looked through the ISOs of living players, if you're unwilling to read the game. You can argue that we aren't helping you today, but you're not exactly helping yourself if you're not even going to read the game that we're talking about.safetydance wrote:Although it's pretty hard to distinguish anything here when people aren't helpful, aren't clear, vote for completely asinine reason and don't do anything to distinguish themselves as town
Honestly, it doesn't bother me if you ask about the setup for the next 100 posts, as long as the next 100 posts also include your thoughts on different players, who you think is scum and why, etc.safetydance wrote:I don't get you. You want me to be ignorant of the setup, in the dark as to what has happened and a supplicant to anything you say.
So you she is definitely town? Also, she can't be any other scum unless you agree with Bro's scenario that it's a 3+1+1 setup. Then I can't wait for Nero to call you stupid.In post 2369, zMuffinMan wrote:It was a hypothetical. BRO said he couldn't see the wraith-scum motivation, I explained the possibility I was considering where gm was actually wraith-scum.safetydance wrote:So if you think GM is scum for her actions then why are you not wanting to lynch her? That seems counter-intuitive.
It doesn't reflect my current thoughts on gm.
No, she did it after finding mafia-scum. If she did it after Who died then she could not have gotten the result on MS.In post 2369, zMuffinMan wrote:It's more to do with the fact that he did it after third party died. I'm going to assume third party needs to be alive to win.safetydance wrote:The act of destroying the ring is very town. You realise that we can't win without it being destroyed?
Note really. Insulting GM, calling Bro stupid, hating me. That's not scumhunting. That's just trying to browbeat anyone that doesn't agree with themIn post 2369, zMuffinMan wrote:Well, that's not actually what he was doing. I understood that he had his own reasons for wanting a massclaim and didn't want to disclose those reasons, and gm prying about this was just dumb.safetydance wrote:No he hasn't, he's just been reacting negatively to everyone and insulting them. You call that scumhunting?
Other than that, gollum has been one of the only people actually trying to figure out who's scum. He's been asking good questions, and his thoughts are also mostly in line with my own (although I don't think I'm as suspicious of Toast as he currently is, and I'm not particularly suspicious of BRO at all atm)
In post 2368, Gollum wrote:SD claiming that we aren't scumhunting is mildly amusing. He's obviously never bothered to read.
No one has asked.In post 2371, Gollum wrote:Why has SD not claimed yet?