The only thing that worries me is that Calcifer made herself look town, offered to marry and then hasn't been anywhere in thread lately, though nacho has been posting on siteIn post 1746, Natirasha wrote:I still have intent to propose to the other femhydra today(Calc).
Don't you even fucking dare.Are we going to make d2 irl another 1k post day?
ugh
lol. Keep trying to discredit. I also don't buy the fact that you weren't serious 'cause your attack on Shadi was serious. No, you're scum and didn't want to attack me until you were under pressure. Good day sum.In post 1723, Saki wrote:So you're guilty of not pushing your scumread until 300 posts later?In post 1719, Nero Cain wrote:Of course you are NOW. But back when I was attacking you in the 700's you didn't get a lot of attention. You didn't attack me UNTIL I brought attention to you. I think the reason that you did not attack me originally is to attempt that I'd leave you alone.In post 1708, Saki wrote:Except that I'm bathing in attention right nowIn post 1698, Nero Cain wrote:It makes no sense 'cause you are claiming that you weren't OMGUS attacking me yet this shows that you obviously were.In post 1690, Saki wrote:Accurate.In post 1687, Nero Cain wrote:The timeline makes no sense.
Nero: Saki is scum for X.
Nero-Saki back and forth.
it drops for a few hundred posts.
Nero:Saki is still scum.
some scummers: oh yea, he's scum
Saki: NERO IZ SCUM FOR R EARLIER BACK N FORTH!!!
Nero:So why weren't you scumreading me back then?
Saki: I wasn't being serious back then...but now I'm being serious.
Calling your attack on me OMGUS, is not discrediting you. ITS WHAT YOU DID.
Which part of it makes no sense?
Also, if I wanted to OMGUS, I could've done it earlier or to many other people.
There was never any PRESSURE on you until my attacks on you in the 1000's. An OMGUS attack on me would ONLY serve to bring attention to yourself. So there's plenty of reason not bring attention to yourself as scum.
No, I attacked you because I was getting serious.
This is weird as fuck 'cause town are getting things done and you seem upset about it?
^She does this as both alignments, fyi.
Highly doubt it too. I still think we should be making proposals/rejections/acceptance public but whatever.In post 1761, T S O wrote:I already had a proposal, and I'm wondering whether to accept.
Do fathers matter eg. the more compatible the father, the better the role? I doubt it, it's too complex.
Role is fixed based on parent who has that kid in their role pm. I asked.In post 1761, T S O wrote:I already had a proposal, and I'm wondering whether to accept.
Do fathers matter eg. the more compatible the father, the better the role? I doubt it, it's too complex.
What's the point of saying this?
Beast told us it was him, and he liked one of your posts and your follow up after he sent the proposal.In post 1761, T S O wrote:I already had a proposal, and I'm wondering whether to accept.
Do fathers matter eg. the more compatible the father, the better the role? I doubt it, it's too complex.
In post 1764, chesskid3 wrote:Role is fixed based on parent who has that kid in their role pm. I asked.In post 1761, T S O wrote:I already had a proposal, and I'm wondering whether to accept.
Do fathers matter eg. the more compatible the father, the better the role? I doubt it, it's too complex.
Alignment is not.
This is not something to wonder about
She does this so much
Until you stop doing this, I will lynch you for it every game.