Fucking dolts.
You are legitimately a fucking moron, aren't you?In post 94, waynegg wrote:no lynch is like the worst idea ever. i'd prefer a possibility of killing scum. so lets try hard to find them. but even if someone dies who isn't scum as long as its not a PR It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum as long as its not a PR It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum It helps town up the odds.
but even if someone dies who isn't scum It helps
if someone dies who isn't scum It helps
It helps
Dumb doesn't mean scum. Besides, Levi actually looks kinda scummy.In post 110, Belisarius wrote:This is the shittest reason for voting someone I've ever read.
VOTE: waynegg
It should be noted that when I made this post, you still hadn't gotten out of aforementioned stage.In post 130, Majiffy wrote:woteva, woteva, i do wot i want!In post 105, pieguyn wrote:Majiffy, Yrealz, Kise, dopog get in here and post plz
Have we left RVS yet? And by that, I mean are we done squabbling about bullshit regarding the essentially-useless-until-near-LYLO RVS votes and wagons?
SMD.In post 132, kanyeknowsbest wrote:whats with the insistence by bad players to not read the thread, ask if were out of rvs yet and refuse to participate until satisfied that we in fact are?
You're a better player than this, Nacho.
Also why do you feel like you're playing ScumLurkCho rather than TownAsFuckCho?
1) No, my having free time is why I'm posting.In post 272, leviathan93 wrote:1) its making you post, even if its not the cause and you were going to post anyway, at least you are which works for me.
2) it doesn't stop you from being scum even if its a shitty reason.
3) why would I check ALL your posts? just because you decrease in every game doesn't necessarily mean much. =P oh you are busy? good for you, so am I. I was unaware, so all I see is not posting. =P i still try to stay updated and post as much as I can. Claim V/LA or whatnot. first i am aware you were busy.
4) i know why i'm voting you, or was voting you UNVOTE: I'm kind of satisfied now as long as more posts comes out of you. =)
5) lack of content IS and most DEFINITELY can be a scum read or interpreted as one. =P
2) It also doesn't make me scum, and potentially makes others scum for said shitty reasons.
3) All you have to do is click my name and see pretty easily that I've made all of about 10 posts in the past week or so. Also the rest of your snarky response reads an awful lot like scum trying to play off their shitty deflection as a not so shitty deflection.
4) Lol. Just lol.
5) ... No. No it can't. If you think it can, you should go back to EM. That's about the only place that is a relevant tell.
I would have probably replaced out if this game was approaching 20 pages by now. This is the first I've been able to make a post not on my phone in this thread.In post 273, talah wrote:When will you be caught up then? Because first you express pleasure that the game isn't moving at breakneck speed, and then you say you haven't made enough posts (and in fact that the game's not far enough in) to be called scummy yet. Are we going to crucify those who *have* posted content? Or are we going to wagon up on those who haven't?
Well hey, I don't know if you're scummy or not but this is a decent way to find out.
I don't think I'll ever utter the phrase "I haven't made enough posts". What I
I think you should be lynching based on scummy behavior, not based on amount or frequency of content. Doing otherwise is just bad play.
What have you found out?