In post 417, pieguyn wrote:
In post 412, AGar wrote:Clearly I didn't give a shit about that post, I even specifically said his first post
at all
bothered me, the tone and all that accompanied by it. I also have since said I've been satisfied with what he has brought to the table. Jesus christ you're dense.
okay no
my point is you accused him with a false reason and are trying to push scum vs. town on what's probably a town vs. town. I never once said you found the post I quoted to be suspicious. By quoting the post I was directly pointing out where Maji said something that shows what you said is wrong, not saying you found it suspicious. from what you've posted, IMO you're either you're seeing and defending against something that's not there or you're just trying to cover up my true point. also, the last sentence is scummy as fuck, cause it seems like you want people to just disregard what I say entirely instead of looking at my arguments.
Let me make this clear:
IT APPEARS TO ME YOU HAVE NO FUCKING POINT.
A lesson in chronology:
Post 130 - Majiffy posts "have we left RVS yet? and by that I mean [...] votes and wagons" The content is not important beyond the initial scope of "have we left RVS yet?"
Post 199 - I replace in.
Post 213 - I am caught up at this point, I vote for Majiffy.
Post 251 - This is Majiffy's next post. He simply tells us he's going to watch Breaking Bad first.
Post 275 - Majiffy's post where he says what you keep bringing up.
Post 294 - My next post in the game. A reply to a question in 270 and
a fucking unvote
.
THIS IS WHY I AM CALLING YOU DENSE. I don't give two flying fucks about what he posted in 275 because my next post after he made that (read: THE NEXT TIME I READ THE THREAD) I had already changed my read on him. Clearly he had reasons not to post a lot, and clearly he responded in a manner which I found as acceptable.
Why in the name of christ is this so important to you? I DID NOT BASE MY CASE ON ANYTHING IN 275. I BASED MY VOTE ON WHAT I SAW IN 130. THERE HAD BEEN NOTHING POSTED FROM MAJIFFY BETWEEN 130 AND MY VOTE. HE ASKED IN ANOTHER POST WHY WE VOTED FOR HIM, AND I EXPLAINED. THIS IS NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND.
Q E FUCKING D.
pieguyn wrote:
not only that but you still haven't explained the false logic on DV
Read this post. If you don't get it, you're not going to.
pieguyn wrote:
In post 412, AGar wrote:[1] No, the use of active lurking is because that's what he's doing. He's not posting content, he's not doing anything. He's just posting fluff. That is the definition of active lurking. I couldn't give two fucks whether you mentioned it previously or before, or whether your attention is on me or on the moon.
[2] He said in each post "I don't think you're scum, but this could definitely be scummy." That's not a read. That's a big ol' stack of Belgian waffles that he could flip back to and say "Look! I knew something was scummy about him all along!" if wagons form.
if he made a big thing about "hey I knew he'd flip scum/town" in the future, I agree it'd be suspicious. but srsly do you think this way about every single person who posts a weak read and says it might be incorrect?
Not every person, but when someone's ENTIRE POSTING HISTORY is "Well this person could be scum but I might be wrong" and not a single read is committed to ("I think this person is scum. Let's lynch them."), yes, I do think that way. Show me one post where Leviathan has actually given a concrete read and COMMITTED to it. ONE. Please, enlighten me. [PEdit: He has apparently voted Belisarius by the time I post this. Why? I have no clue, and I doubt there's a reason, but that's the first time in the entire game he's committed to anything.]
It's called scumhunting, bud, and you might want to learn how to do it.
over. But you on the other hand expect that the prerequisite for flawless scum play is to be a newb with your first ever scum role. On D1. Where if there's no day talk, he's left flapping in the wind by himself. Dat must be sum o dem college smarts right there.
